| Literature DB >> 30271664 |
Changhong Ren1,2,3,4, Ning Li1,5, Sijie Li1,4, Rongrong Han1,4, Qingjian Huang1,2,4, Jiangnan Hu2, Kunlin Jin2, Xunming Ji1,3,4.
Abstract
Intracranial and extracranial arterial stenosis, the primary cause of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (CCH), is a critical reason for the pathogenesis of vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease characterized by cognitive impairments. Our previous study demonstrated that limb remote ischemic conditioning (LRIC) improved cerebral perfusion in intracranial arterial stenosis patients. The current study aimed to test whether LRIC promotes angiogenesis and increases phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (p-eNOS) activity in CCH rat model. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to three different groups: sham group, bilateral carotid artery occlusion (2VO) group and 2VO+LRIC group. Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) was measured with laser speckle contrast imager at 4 weeks. Cognitive testing was performed at four and six weeks after 2VO surgery. We demonstrated that LRIC treatment increased cerebral perfusion and improved the CCH induced spatial learning and memory impairment. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that LRIC prevented cell death in the CA1 region, and increased the number of vessels and angiogenesis in the hippocampus after 2VO. Western blot analysis shows that LRIC therapy significantly increased p-eNOS expression in the hippocampus when compared with 2VO rats. Moreover, eNOS inhibitor reduced the effect of LRIC on angiogenesis in the hippocampus and spatial learning and memory function. Our data suggested that LRIC promoted angiogenesis, which is mediated, in part, by eNOS/NO.Entities:
Keywords: NO; angiogenesis; chronic cerebral hypoperfusion; eNOS; limb ischemic conditioning
Year: 2018 PMID: 30271664 PMCID: PMC6147592 DOI: 10.14336/AD.2017.1106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Dis ISSN: 2152-5250 Impact factor: 6.745
Figure 1.Detection of cerebral blood flow changes by laser specle contrast imager
A) Laser speckle images taken from representative rats in sham, 2VO, and 2VO+LRIC groups. B) Absolute value of cerebral perfusion in three groups.
Figure 2.Detection of spatial learning and memory by Morris water maze
A) Escape latency time by Morris water maze tested from 3 weeks after 2VO surgery. B) Percentage of time spent in the target (memory retention ability) at 4 weeks after 2VO surgery. C) Escape latency time by Morris water maze tested from 5 weeks after 2VO surgery. D) Percentage of time spent (memory retention ability) in the target at 6 weeks. * P<0.05. ** P<0.01. N=13/group.
Figure 3.LRIC decreased neuronal cells death after 2VO
A) Representative images of whole hippocampus stained by Nissl stain. B) Images show higher magnifications of CA1 regions as mentioned in A. C) Representative images showing expression of NeuN in the CA1 region. D) Bar graph shows a quantification of NeuN+ cells. E) Western blots assay detected neuronal marker MAP-2 and GAP43 in the hippocampus. ** P<0.01,
Figure 4.LRIC enhanced the vessels number in the hippocampus after 2VO
A) Representative images of vessels in the hippocampus detected by lectin. B) Images represent double-immunostaining for Lectin (green) and Ki67 (red) cells. C) Bar graph shows vessel numbers. D) Western blots assay of vessel marker CD31. ** P<0.01. N = 5 per group.
Figure 5.LRIC upregulated the expression of p-eNOS
A) Bar graph shows a quantification of p-eNOS/GAPDH ratio in different stage after 2VO. ** P<0.01. N = 5 per group. B) Representative images showing expression of p-eNOS.
Figure 6.NOS inhibitor suppressed the effect of LRIC on vessels number in hippocampus
A) Representative images of vessels in the hippocampus detected by lectin. B) Bar graph shows a quantification of vessels number. * P<0.05. N = 6 per group. C) Bar graph shows a quantification of Lectin+/Ki67+ cells. N = 6 per group. **P < 0.01.
Figure 7.NOS inhibitor suppressed the effect of LRIC on learning and memory behavior
A) Escape latency time by Morris water maze tested from 5 weeks after 2VO surgery. B) Percentage of time spent in the target (memory retention ability) at 6 weeks after 2VO surgery. * P<0.05. ** P<0.01. N=13/group.