| Literature DB >> 30271535 |
Kevin Donnelly1,2, Stephen Cavers2, Joan E Cottrell3, Richard A Ennos1.
Abstract
Local adaptation occurs as the result of differential selection among populations. Observations made under common environmental conditions may reveal phenotypic differences between populations with an underlying genetic basis; however, exposure to a contrasting novel environment can trigger release of otherwise unobservable (cryptic) genetic variation. We conducted a waterlogging experiment on a common garden trial of Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris (L.), saplings originating from across a steep rainfall gradient in Scotland. A flood treatment was maintained for approximately 1 year; physiological responses were gauged periodically in terms of photochemical capacity as measured via chlorophyll fluorescence. During the treatment, flooded individuals experienced a reduction in photochemical capacity, F v /F m, this reduction being greater for material originating from drier, eastern sites. Phenotypic variance was increased under flooding, and this increase was notably smaller in saplings originating from western sites where precipitation is substantially greater and waterlogging is more common. We conclude that local adaptation has occurred with respect to waterlogging tolerance and that, under the flooding treatment, the greater increase in variability observed in populations originating from drier sites is likely to reflect a relative absence of past selection. In view of a changing climate, we note that comparatively maladapted populations may possess considerable adaptive potential, due to cryptic genetic variation, that should not be overlooked.Entities:
Keywords: Scots pine; chlorophyll fluorescence; common garden; cryptic genetic variation; local adaptation; waterlogging
Year: 2018 PMID: 30271535 PMCID: PMC6157661 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Sites of origin for the populations in the study and the location of the common garden. Map of bioclimatic zones adapted from Brown (2017), based upon data from 1991 to 2010 [Colour figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Coordinates of trial populations, the range of altitudes at which the mother trees were sampled, alongside mean monthly temperature and rainfall taken from Met Office estimates
| Provenance | Latitude | Longitude | Altitudinal range (m.a.s.l.) | Mean monthly temp (°C) | Mean monthly rainfall (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abernethy (AB) | 57.21 | −3.61 | 365–363 | 6.82 | 67.66 |
| Allt Cul (AC) | 57.04 | −3.35 | 435–512 | 6.44 | 79.85 |
| Cona Glen (CG) | 56.79 | −5.33 | 89–180 | 8.45 | 181.73 |
| Crannach (CR) | 56.58 | −4.68 | 258–338 | 6.10 | 211.07 |
| Glen Einig (GE) | 57.95 | −4.76 | 45–69 | 7.04 | 111.18 |
| Glen Tanar (GT) | 57.05 | −2.86 | 293–422 | 7.40 | 70.91 |
| Loch Clair (LC) | 57.56 | −5.36 | 102–166 | 8.07 | 234.94 |
| Rhiddoroch (RD) | 57.89 | −4.98 | 138–220 | 8.45 | 139.39 |
| Shieldaig | 57.51 | −5.64 | 44–132 | 7.60 | 198.71 |
|
| 55.86 | −3.21 |
| 7.08 | 77.73 |
Top models in terms of AICc for differing combinations of fixed effects. For brevity, only models with a ΔAICc < 2 are shown (comprehensive results are provided in Table S1)
| Intercept | Tre | Long | Rain | Day | Tre:Long | Tre:Rain | Tre:Day | Long:Day | Rain:Day |
| ΔAICc |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Odds‐transformed | ||||||||||||
| 3.470 | + | − | − | −0.132 | − | − | + | − | − | 10 | 0.00 | 0.391 |
| (b) Odds‐transformed | ||||||||||||
| 3.721 | + | −0.026 | − | 0.041 | + | − | + | 0.047 | − | 13 | 0.00 | 0.326 |
| 3.995 | + | 0.035 | − | −0.170 | + | − | + | − | − | 12 | 1.26 | 0.174 |
| (c) CVP for previous‐year needles | ||||||||||||
| 35.49 | + | − | − | 6.346 | − | − | + | − | − | 7 | 0.00 | 0.346 |
| 37.35 | + | − | −0.013 | 6.346 | − | + | + | − | − | 9 | 1.97 | 0.129 |
| (d) CVP for current‐year needles | ||||||||||||
| 24.68 | + | − | 6.676e−4 | 1.764 | − | + | + | − | − | 9 | 0.00 | 0.493 |
| 24.68 | + | − | 6.676e−4 | 0.156 | − | + | + | − | 0.011 | 10 | 1.80 | 0.200 |
For any given model, the terms present are represented by either “+” (for factors) or the value of the coefficient (for covariates); the absence of a parameter is denoted “−.” Note that “days since treatment start” was standardized (divided by two standard deviations) prior to analyses. Longitude and rainfall terms were not permitted to occur within the same model. Tables a and b describe fixed effects for the odds‐transformed F v /F m; c and d for CVP derived from the same data (estimated at the population level).
Key: Tre, treatment; Long, longitude (°); Rain, mean monthly rainfall at site of origin (mm); Day, days since treatment start; df, degrees of freedom; ΔAICc, difference in AICc between current and best model; w, Akaike weight.
Figure 2F v /F m (odds‐transformed) for control and treatment groups throughout duration of study, for (a) mean values and (b) CV P. The transition between previous‐ and current‐year needles is represented by a line break. Photochemical capacity was reduced on average by exposure to waterlogging, whereas the reverse was true for CV P [Colour figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3Interaction plots displaying (a) F v /F m (odds‐transformed) × longitude of at site of origin, showing a modest reduction in photochemical capacity under waterlogging with increasing longitude, and (b) CVP × mean monthly rainfall of at site of origin, whereby phenotypic variation under waterlogging increases toward sites with lower rainfall. Data in both plots correspond to current‐year needles [Colour figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]