| Literature DB >> 30271502 |
Dalong Cao1,2, Yuanyuan Qu1,2, Xuan Zhang3, Fujiang Xu4, Shuxian Zhou4, Guiming Zhang5, Bo Dai1,2, Yao Zhu1,2, Guohai Shi1,2, Yijun Shen1,2, Yiping Zhu1,2, Hailiang Zhang1,2, Dingwei Ye1,2, Jianyuan Zhao3.
Abstract
Background: Specific lifestyle factors including tobacco-exposure are vital etiologic factors for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), F2R Like Thrombin/Trypsin Receptor 3 (F2RL3) is associated with smoking but it is unknown whether its expression translate into poor survival of clear cell RCC (ccRCC). In the current study, the expression profiling and prognostic value of F2RL3 in Chinese patients with ccRCC were investigated.Entities:
Keywords: F2RL3 expression; aggressive features; poor survival; renal cell carcinoma
Year: 2018 PMID: 30271502 PMCID: PMC6160688 DOI: 10.7150/jca.23923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Clinicopathological characteristics in relation to F2RL3 expression status.
| Variable | Entire group (n=367) | F2RL3 mRNA expression | F2RL3 IHC expression | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low expression (n=91) | Middle expression (n=147) | High expression (n=129) | Negative (n=114) | Positive (n=253) | ||||
| Age at surgery (y, mean±SD) | 55.3±11.7 | 55.4±12.7 | 55.1±11.3 | 55.4±11.5 | 0.969 | 55.9±12.3 | 55.0±11.4 | 0.483 |
| Sex (n, %) | 0.980 | 0.464 | ||||||
| Male | 248 (67.6) | 61 (67.0) | 99 (67.3) | 88 (68.2) | 74 (64.9) | 174 (68.8) | ||
| Female | 119 (32.4) | 30 (33.0) | 48 (32.7) | 41 (31.8) | 40 (35.1) | 79 (31.2) | ||
| Smoking (n, %) | 0.033 | |||||||
| No | 163 (44.4) | 35 (38.5) | 79 (53.7) | 49 (38.0) | 60 (52.6) | 103 (40.7) | ||
| Yes | 204 (55.6) | 56 (61.5) | 68 (46.3) | 80 (62.0) | 54 (47.4) | 150 (59.3) | ||
| Clinical manifestation (n, %) | 0.729 | 0.562 | ||||||
| Incidental | 246 (67.0) | 60 (65.9) | 102 (69.4) | 84 (65.1) | 74 (64.9) | 172 (68.0) | ||
| Symptomatic | 121 (33.0) | 31 (34.1) | 45 (30.6) | 45 (34.9) | 40 (35.1) | 81 (32.0) | ||
| Laterality (n, %) | 0.902 | 0.425 | ||||||
| Left | 182 (49.6) | 44 (48.4) | 72 (49.0) | 66 (51.2) | 53 (46.5) | 129 (51.0) | ||
| Right | 185 (50.4) | 47 (51.6) | 75 (51.0) | 63 (48.8) | 61 (53.5) | 124 (49.0) | ||
| Tumor size (cm, mean±SD) | 5.2±2.4 | 4.9±2.6 | 5.1±2.5 | 5.5±2.2 | 0.197 | 4.8±2.6 | 5.3±2.3 | 0.064 |
| T stage at presentation (n, %) | ||||||||
| T1-T2 | 300 (81.7) | 84 (92.3) | 127 (86.4) | 89 (69.0) | 105 (92.1) | 195 (77.1) | ||
| T3-T4 | 67 (18.3) | 7 (7.7) | 20 (13.6) | 40 (31.0) | 9 (7.9) | 58 (22.9) | ||
| N stage at presentation (n, %) | ||||||||
| N0 | 326 (88.8) | 84 (92.3) | 137 (93.2) | 105 (81.4) | 110 (96.5) | 216 ( 85.4) | ||
| N1 | 41 (11.2) | 7 (7.7) | 10 (6.8) | 24 (18.6) | 4 (3.5) | 37 (14.6) | ||
| M stage at presentation (n, %) | ||||||||
| M0 | 330 (89.9) | 85 (93.4) | 137 (93.2) | 108 (83.7) | 111 (97.4) | 219 (86.6) | ||
| M1 | 37 (10.1) | 6 (6.6) | 10 (6.8) | 21 (16.3) | 3 (2.6) | 34 (13.4) | ||
| ISUP grade (n, %) | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 175 (47.7) | 63 (69.2) | 73 (49.7) | 39 (30.2) | 75 (65.8) | 100 (39.5) | ||
| 3-4 | 192 (52.3) | 28 (30.8) | 74 (50.3) | 90 (69.8) | 39 (34.2) | 153 (60.5) | ||
aP velue for F2RL3 mRNA expression
bP velue for F2RL3 IHC expression
Figure 1The percentage of high, middle and low F2RL3 mRNA expression in patients with different TNM stage (A) and ISUP grade (B).
Figure 2The mean value of F2RL3 mRNA expression in enrolled participants with different TNM stage (A) and ISUP grade (B).
Figure 3The percentage of positive and negative F2RL3 protein expression in patients with different TNM stage (A) and ISUP grade (B).
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of PFS in 367 enrolled ccRCC patients
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysisa | Multivariate analysisb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | ||
| Age at surgery | 1.007 (0.994-1.020) | 0.297 | 1.008 (0.995-1.021) | 0.240 | ||||
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.774 (0.567-1.058) | 0.108 | 0.757 (0.514-1.113) | 0.157 | 0.765 (0.522-1.122) | 0.171 | ||
| Smoking (No vs. Yes) | 1.079 (0.813-1.432) | 0.599 | 0.856 (0.602-1.218) | 0.388 | 0.871 (0.616-1.230) | 0.433 | ||
| Clinical manifestation (incidental vs. symptomatic) | 1.010 (0.751-1.359) | 0.945 | 0.965 (0.711-1.311) | 0.822 | 0.956 (0.703-1.299) | 0.772 | ||
| Laterality (left vs. right) | 1.053 (0.795-1.393) | 0.720 | 1.018 (0.765-1.355) | 0.902 | 1.031 (0.773-1.374) | 0.838 | ||
| Tumor size | 1.033 (0.979-1.090) | 0.233 | 1.035 (0.977-1.096) | 0.245 | 1.037 (0.980-1.098) | 0.211 | ||
| T stage (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4) | ||||||||
| N stage (N0 vs. N1) | ||||||||
| M stage (M0 vs. M1) | ||||||||
| ISUP grade (1-2 vs. 3-4) | ||||||||
| F2RL3 mRNA expression (Low vs. middle) | 1.149 (0.777-1.698) | 0.487 | 1.159 (0.784-1.713) | 0.460 | - | |||
| F2RL3 mRNA expression (low vs. high) | ||||||||
| F2RL3 IHC expression (negative vs. positive) | ||||||||
aMultivariate model include F2RL3 mRNA expression and covariates.
bMultivariate model include F2RL3 IHC expression and covariates.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of OS in 367 enrolled ccRCC patients
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysisa | Multivariate analysisb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | ||
| Age at surgery | 1.014 (0.999-1.029) | 0.068 | 1.013 (0.998-1.029) | 0.086 | ||||
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.922 (0.639-1.331) | 0.665 | 1.015 (0.635-1.622) | 0.952 | 1.028 (0.642-1.646) | 0.908 | ||
| Smoking (No vs. Yes) | 1.046 (0.745-1.470) | 0.794 | 0.968 (0.628-1.493) | 0.884 | 0.985 (0.641-1.516) | 0.947 | ||
| Clinical manifestation (incidental vs. symptomatic) | 0.968 (0.674-1.391) | 0.861 | 0.951 (0.654-1.382) | 0.791 | 0.951 (0.653-1.384) | 0.793 | ||
| Laterality (left vs. right) | 1.030 (0.735-1.443) | 0.866 | 0.914 (0.645-1.295) | 0.613 | 0.938 (0.662-1.329) | 0.719 | ||
| Tumor size | 0.995 (0.928-1.067) | 0.890 | 1.004 (0.931-1.082) | 0.923 | 1.010 (0.938-1.088) | 0.792 | ||
| T stage (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4) | ||||||||
| N stage (N0 vs. N1) | ||||||||
| M stage (M0 vs. M1) | ||||||||
| ISUP grade (1-2 vs. 3-4) | 1.658 (0.938-2.930) | 0.082 | ||||||
| F2RL3 mRNA expression (Low vs. middle) | 1.473 (0.875-2.479) | 0.145 | 1.497 (0.889-2.520) | 0.129 | - | |||
| F2RL3 mRNA expression (low vs. high) | ||||||||
| F2RL3 IHC expression (negative vs. positive) | ||||||||
aMultivariate model include F2RL3 mRNA expression and covariates.
bMultivariate model include F2RL3 IHC expression and covariates.
Figure 4Correlated of F2RL3 mRNA expression with PFS (A) and OS (B) in the enrolled 367 ccRCC patients. High F2RL3 mRNA expression is significantly associated with poor PFS and OS, compared with middle and low F2RL3 expression.
Figure 5Correlated of F2RL3 protein expression with PFS (A) and OS (B) in the enrolled 367 ccRCC patients. The PFS and OS in the patents with positive F2RL3 protein expression were significantly shorten than in negative F2RL3 protein expression