| Literature DB >> 30270907 |
Janet Douglass1, Patricia Graves2, Daniel Lindsay3, Luke Becker4, Maureen Roineau5, Jesse Masson6, Ni Ni Aye7, San San Win8, Tint Wai9, Yi Yi Win10, Susan Gordon11,12.
Abstract
When normal lymphatic function is hampered, imperceptible subcutaneous edema can develop and progress to overt lymphedema. Low-cost reliable devices for objective assessment of lymphedema are well accepted in clinical practice and research on breast-cancer related lymphedema but are untested in populations with lymphatic filariasis (LF). This is a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data in a longitudinal study on asymptomatic, LF antigen-positive and -negative young people in Myanmar. Rapid field screening was used to identify antigen-positive cases and a group of antigen-negative controls of similar age and gender were invited to continue in the study. Tissue compressibility was assessed with three tissue tonometers, and free fluids were assessed using bio-impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Infection status was confirmed by Og4C3 antigen assay. At baseline (n = 98), antigen-positive cases had clinically relevant increases in tissue compressibility at the calf using a digital Indurometer (11.1%, p = 0.021), and in whole-leg free fluid using BIS (9.2%, p = 0.053). Regression analysis for moderating factors (age, gender, hydration) reinforced the between-infection group differences. Results demonstrate that sub-clinical changes associated with infection can be detected in asymptomatic cases. Further exploration of these low-cost devices in clinical and research settings on filariasis-related lymphedema are warranted.Entities:
Keywords: bio-impedance spectroscopy; lower extremity; lymphatic filariasis; lymphedema; neglected tropical disease; tissue tonometry
Year: 2017 PMID: 30270907 PMCID: PMC6082065 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed2040050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Infect Dis ISSN: 2414-6366
Figure 1Participant inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Figure 2Flow of participants through recruitment, screening, and baseline data collection.
Group characteristics of antigen-positive and antigen-negative participants (positive by either immunochromatographic test (ICT) or Og4C3) at baseline.
| LF Antigen-Positive Cases | LF Antigen-Negative Controls | Mean Diff (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years—mean (SD) | 15.20 (3.38) | 15.48 (3.46) | 0.28 (−1.09, 1.07) | 0.691 a |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 27 (54%) | 28 (58%) | 0.410 b | |
| Male | 23 (46%) | 20 (42%) | 0.410 b | |
| Height in cm—mean (SD) | 151.80 (12.56) | 152.20 (11.52) | 0.399 (−4.44, 5.24) | 0.870 a |
| Weight in kg—mean (SD) | 42.27 (12.81) | 42.30 (10.12) | 0.028 (−4.617, 4.670) | 0.990 a |
| BMI in kg/m2—mean (SD) | 18.05 (3.46) | 18.03 (2.65) | −0.012 (−1.239, 1.216) | 0.985 a |
| Body composition | 0.976 c | |||
| Median weight | 41 (82%) | 40 (83%) | ||
| Underweight > −2SD | 7 (14%) | 6 (13%) | ||
| Overweight > +1SD | 2 (4%) | 2 (4%) | ||
| Dominant leg right/left | 47/3 | 47/1 | 0.324 b | |
| Occupation | 0.395 c | |||
| Student | 14 (28%) | 13 (27%) | ||
| Working/other | 32/4 (72%) | 34/1 (73%) | ||
| Drank liquid | 0.590 c | |||
| <60 min | 13 (26%) | 12 (26%) | ||
| >60 min | 37 (74%) | 35 (74%) (1 NA) | ||
| Consumed 2013 MDA | 17 (34%) | 22 (46%) | 0.383 c |
LF = lymphatic filariasis; BMI = body mass index; SD = standard deviation; a independent samples t-test; b Fishers exact test; c Pearson chi-square; NA = participant was not asked.
Between-infection group differences for Indurometer and BIS measures, size, and direction of variation.
| Measurement Point Indurometer | Positive | Negative | Mean Difference (%) | Direction in Positive Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||||
| Dominant anterior thigh | 4.80 (0.76) | 4.72 (0.69) | 0.05 (1.1%) | Softer | 0.731 |
| Non-dominant anterior thigh | 5.10 (0.88) | 5.00 (0.69) | 0.10 (1.9%) | Softer | 0.546 |
| Dominant posterior thigh | 4.13 (0.93) | 4.06 (0.87) | 0.07 (1.7%) | Softer | 0.701 |
| Non-dominant posterior thigh | 3.88 (0.83) | 3.86 (0.95) | 0.02 (0.4%) | Softer | 0.933 |
| Dominant calf | 2.91 (0.57) | 2.70 (0.68) | 0.21 (7.8%) | Softer | 0.096 |
| Non-dominant calf | 2.73 (0.65) | 2.46 (0.65) | 0.27 (11.1%) *,# | Softer | 0.021 |
| BIS | |||||
| Dominant leg | 2.44 (0.46) | 2.56 (0.45) | 0.12 (4.9%) # | More fluid | 0.220 |
| Non-dominant leg | 2.62 (0.56) | 2.86 (0.59) | 0.24 (9.2%) # | More fluid | 0.053 |
SD = standard deviation; * Significant between-group difference p ≤ 0.05; # clinically relevant between-group difference.
Stepwise regression for moderating factors associated with variation in Indurometer and bio-impedance spectroscopy (BIS) measures.
| Indurometer | BIS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Values = Increased Tissue Compressibility | Lower Values = Increased ECF | ||||||
| Posterior Thigh B (SE) | Calf B (SE) | Whole Leg B (SE) | |||||
| Factor | Dominant | Non−dominant | Dominant | Non−dominant | Dominant | Non−dominant | |
| Antigen Positive | 0.070 (0.182) | 0.015 (0.180) | 0.212 (0.126) | 0.272 (0.116) * | −0.117 (0.095) | −0.238 (0.122) | |
| Antigen Positive | 0.093 (0.168) | 0.049 (0.166) | 0.234 (0.111) * | 0.286 (0.104) ** | −0.108 (0.083) | −0.210 (0.099) * | |
| Gender = Female | 0.751 (0.178) ** | 0.679 (0.175) ** | 0.639 (0.117) ** | 0.492 (0.110) ** | 0.230 (0.087) ** | 0.485 (0.103) ** | |
| Older age | 0.022 (0.025) | 0.041 (0.025) | 0.010 (0.017) | 0.024 (0.016) | −0.051 (0.012) ** | −0.061 (0.015) ** | |
| Underweight | 0.136 (0.250) | 0.277 (0.247) | −0.052 (0.165) | −0.094 (0.155) | −0.237 (0.120) | −0.302 (0.142) * | |
| Less Recent Hydration | −0.338 (0.177) | −0.223 (0.174) | −0.139 (0.117) | −0.239 (0.110) * | 0.107 (0.085) | 0.124 (0.101) | |
ECF = extracellular fluid; SE = standard error; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Mean values and between-leg differences using the Indurometer and BIS.
| Indurometer ( | BIS ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior Thigh | Posterior Thigh | Calf | Whole Leg | |
| Dominant leg mean (SD) | 4.74 (0.72) | 4.10 (0.90) | 2.81 (0.63) | 2.50 (0.46) |
| Non−dominant leg mean (SD) | 5.05 (0.79) | 3.87 (0.89) | 2.60 (0.59) | 2.74 (0.59) |
| Mean difference (SD) | −0.31 (0.31) | 0.23 (0.23) | 0.21 (0.21) | −0.24 (0.32) |
| 95% CI of the difference | −0.41, −0.21 | 0.11, 0.35 | 0.13, 0.28 | −0.31, −0.17 |
| % difference | 6.5% ** | 5.6% ** | 7.5% ** | 9.6% **,# |
| Direction (dominant leg) | Harder | Softer | Softer | More fluid |
SD = standard deviation; ** Significant between-leg difference p ≤ 0.01; # Clinically relevant between-leg difference (tonometry > 10%, BIS > 3%).
Figure 3Percentage between-leg differences using the Indurometer and BIS in the LF antigen-negative cases, LF antigen-positive cases, and whole cohort. Data points which are closer to the outer ring indicate greater between-leg differences.