Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy in Cryptogenic Strokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Cryptogenic strokes account for about 25% to 40% of total ischemic strokes, and 1 of the 3 of these have a patent foramen ovale (PFO). A meta-analysis concerning the effectiveness and safety of PFO closure in cryptogenic strokes or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) was performed. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through April 2018. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials. Primary and secondary end points were, respectively, stroke or TIA and stroke recurrences. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all end points using fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses. Data were included from 6 trials involving 3560 patients. In the pooled analysis, PFO closure was superior to medical treatment for both primary (RR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.18-0.82; P < .02) and secondary end points (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.44-0.76; P < .001). Transcatheter closure significantly increased the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF; RR: 5.74; P < .001). Percutaneous closure is superior to medical treatment in reducing stroke and TIA recurrence, even if with a significant risk increasing for new-onset AF. These findings suggest that transcatheter closure is indicated in patients with cryptogenic strokes and large PFO.