Literature DB >> 30270032

Public reporting of hospital quality data: What do referring physicians want to know?

Max Geraedts1, Peter Hermeling2, Annette Ortwein3, Werner de Cruppé3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify ambulatory care physicians' priorities for hospital quality criteria to support them in counselling patients what hospital to choose.
METHODS: Three hundred non-hospital-based stratified randomly sampled physicians, representing the five main referring specialties in Germany participated in a cross-sectional survey. Physicians rated the importance of 80 hospital quality criteria to be used in their counselling of patients in need of hospital care. Criteria selection was based on a literature analysis and the content of Germany's mandatory hospital quality reports. We calculated the most important criteria and performed an ordinal regression analysis to examine whether the physicians' characteristics 'age', 'sex', 'specialty', 'practice type' and 'region' affected physicians' importance ratings.
RESULTS: To counsel patients in need of a hospital referral, physicians preferred hospital quality criteria that reflect their own and their patients' experiences with a hospital. Additionally, hospitals' expertise and results of treatment were rated highly important. In contrast, hospitals' structural characteristics and compliance with external requirements were rated less important. Physicians' characteristics affected importance ratings only negligibly.
CONCLUSIONS: To support referring physicians' counselling of patients regarding what hospital to choose in order to achieve optimal patient outcomes eventually, hospital report cards must be enriched by information on physicians' and their patients' experiences with hospitals. Hospitals' structural characteristics play a minor role in counselling of patients needing hospital care.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer health information; Hospital report cards; Public reporting; Quality of health care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30270032     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  4 in total

1.  Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Jacqueline Haskell; Emily Cooper; Daniel A Harris; Anne Murray; Rebekah L Gardner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Associations of hospital volume and hospital competition with short-term, middle-term and long-term patient outcomes after breast cancer surgery: a retrospective population-based study.

Authors:  Wouter van der Schors; Ron Kemp; Jolanda van Hoeve; Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen; John Maduro; Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters; Sabine Siesling; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Defining minimum volume thresholds to increase quality of care: a new patient-oriented approach using mixed integer programming.

Authors:  Justus F A Vogel; Max Barkhausen; Christoph M Pross; Alexander Geissler
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  The Effects of Healthcare Quality on the Willingness to Pay More Taxes to Improve Public Healthcare: Testing Two Alternative Hypotheses from the Research Literature.

Authors:  Nazim Habibov; Rong Luo; Alena Auchynnikava
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.462

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.