Laurence Leysen1,2, Nele Adriaenssens2,3, Jo Nijs1,2,4, Roselien Pas1,2, Thomas Bilterys2, Sofie Vermeir2, Astrid Lahousse2, David Beckwée2,5,6. 1. Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium. 2. Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Department of Oncology, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. 4. Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. 5. Frailty in Ageing Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. 6. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The differentiation between acute and chronic pain can be insufficient for appropriate pain management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of the predominant pain type (nociceptive, neuropathic, or central sensitization [CS] pain) in breast cancer survivors (BCS) with chronic pain. The secondary aims were to examine (1) differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between the different pain groups; and (2) the associations between patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors and the different pain types. METHODS: To determine the prevalence of the predominant type of pain, a recently proposed classification system was used. BCS were asked to complete the VAS for pain, Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire, Margolis Pain Diagram, Central Sensitization Inventory, and Short Form 36 (SF-36). RESULTS: Ninety-one BCS participated, among whom 25.3% presented neuropathic pain, 18.7% nociceptive pain, and 15.4% CS pain. Mixed pain was found in 40.6%. A significant intergroup difference in HRQoL was found for SF-36 "general health" (P = 0.04). The odds for the presence of CS rather than nociceptive pain are 26 times higher in patients exposed to hormone therapy in comparison to the nonexposed (odds ratio 25.95, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 504.37, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Neuropathic pain is most frequent in BCS. Strong associations were found between CS pain and hormone therapy.
INTRODUCTION: The differentiation between acute and chronic pain can be insufficient for appropriate pain management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of the predominant pain type (nociceptive, neuropathic, or central sensitization [CS] pain) in breast cancer survivors (BCS) with chronic pain. The secondary aims were to examine (1) differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between the different pain groups; and (2) the associations between patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors and the different pain types. METHODS: To determine the prevalence of the predominant type of pain, a recently proposed classification system was used. BCS were asked to complete the VAS for pain, Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire, Margolis Pain Diagram, Central Sensitization Inventory, and Short Form 36 (SF-36). RESULTS: Ninety-one BCS participated, among whom 25.3% presented neuropathic pain, 18.7% nociceptive pain, and 15.4% CS pain. Mixed pain was found in 40.6%. A significant intergroup difference in HRQoL was found for SF-36 "general health" (P = 0.04). The odds for the presence of CS rather than nociceptive pain are 26 times higher in patients exposed to hormone therapy in comparison to the nonexposed (odds ratio 25.95, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 504.37, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION:Neuropathic pain is most frequent in BCS. Strong associations were found between CS pain and hormone therapy.
Authors: Morten Thronæs; Trude Rakel Balstad; Cinzia Brunelli; Erik Torbjørn Løhre; Pål Klepstad; Ola Magne Vagnildhaug; Stein Kaasa; Anne Kari Knudsen; Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sevilay Tümkaya Yılmaz; Anneleen Malfliet; Ömer Elma; Tom Deliens; Jo Nijs; Peter Clarys; An De Groef; Iris Coppieters Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Laura Lorenzo-Gallego; Beatriz Arranz-Martín; Helena Romay-Barrero; Virginia Prieto-Gómez; Enrique Lluch; María Torres-Lacomba Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390