Literature DB >> 30269102

Association between dimensions of the psychosocial and physical work environment and latent smoking trajectories: a 16-year cohort study of the Canadian workforce.

Kathleen G Dobson1,2, Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet1,3, Cameron A Mustard1,2, Peter M Smith1,2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the number of latent smoking trajectories among Canadians employed in the workforce over a 16-year period, and if latent trajectories in dimensions of the physical and psychosocial work environment were associated with specific smoking trajectories.
METHODS: We studied 5461 employed adults from the longitudinal Canadian National Population Health Survey. Daily cigarette consumption was measured biannually from 1994 to 2010. Work environment factors (skill discretion, decision authority, psychological demands, job insecurity, physical exertion and workplace social support) were measured in 1994 and then from 2000 to 2010 using an abbreviated form of the Job Content Questionnaire. Smoking and work environment trajectories were derived using group-based trajectory modelling. Associations between work environment trajectory classes and smoking trajectory classes were estimated using multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: Four latent smoking trajectories were seen: non-smokers; ceasing smokers (consuming ~14 cigarettes/day in 1994 and 0 in 2008-2010); smokers (consuming ~7 cigarettes/day between 1994 and 2010); and heavy smokers (consuming ~22 cigarettes/day in 1994 and ~14 in 2010). Lower skill discretion, high psychological demands, high physical exertion and low social support trajectories were associated with membership in the heavy smoking trajectory compared with the non-smoking trajectory. Low decision authority, high psychological demands and high physical exertion trajectories were associated with membership in the ceasing compared with the non-smoking trajectory.
CONCLUSIONS: Certain physical and psychosocial work environment trajectories were associated with heavy and ceasing smoking behaviours over a 16-year period. The role of the work environment should be further considered in smoking cessation programmes. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; psychology; public health; smoking; stress

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30269102     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  5 in total

1.  Investigating the Relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Cigarette Smoking in University Students in Isfahan, Iran.

Authors:  Zohreh Halvaiepour; Mehdi Nosratabadi
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2021-07-26

2.  Does persistent precarious employment affect health outcomes among working age adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Pulford; Alekh Thapa; Rachel M Thomson; Annette Guilding; Michael James Green; Alastair Leyland; Frank Popham; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 6.286

3.  Why do apprentices smoke much more than high school students? Understanding educational disparities in smoking with a Oaxaca-blinder decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Sandra Chyderiotis; Tarik Benmarhnia; Stanislas Spilka; François Beck; Raphaël Andler; Stéphane Legleye; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Using Mendelian randomization analysis to better understand the relationship between mental health and substance use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jorien L Treur; Marcus R Munafò; Emma Logtenberg; Reinout W Wiers; Karin J H Verweij
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  The Mediating Effect of Unhealthy Behaviors and Body Mass Index in the Relation Between High Physical Workload and Self-Rated Poor Health in Male Construction Workers.

Authors:  Karin I Proper; Bart Cillekens; Jos W R Twisk; Pieter Coenen; Suzan J W Robroek; Sandra H van Oostrom
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.306

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.