Literature DB >> 30268846

How to control for confounds in decoding analyses of neuroimaging data.

Lukas Snoek1, Steven Miletić2, H Steven Scholte3.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, multivariate "decoding analyses" have become a popular alternative to traditional mass-univariate analyses in neuroimaging research. However, a fundamental limitation of using decoding analyses is that it remains ambiguous which source of information drives decoding performance, which becomes problematic when the to-be-decoded variable is confounded by variables that are not of primary interest. In this study, we use a comprehensive set of simulations as well as analyses of empirical data to evaluate two methods that were previously proposed and used to control for confounding variables in decoding analyses: post hoc counterbalancing and confound regression. In our empirical analyses, we attempt to decode gender from structural MRI data while controlling for the confound "brain size". We show that both methods introduce strong biases in decoding performance: post hoc counterbalancing leads to better performance than expected (i.e., positive bias), which we show in our simulations is due to the subsampling process that tends to remove samples that are hard to classify or would be wrongly classified; confound regression, on the other hand, leads to worse performance than expected (i.e., negative bias), even resulting in significant below chance performance in some realistic scenarios. In our simulations, we show that below chance accuracy can be predicted by the variance of the distribution of correlations between the features and the target. Importantly, we show that this negative bias disappears in both the empirical analyses and simulations when the confound regression procedure is performed in every fold of the cross-validation routine, yielding plausible (above chance) model performance. We conclude that, from the various methods tested, cross-validated confound regression is the only method that appears to appropriately control for confounds which thus can be used to gain more insight into the exact source(s) of information driving one's decoding analysis.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Confounds; Counterbalancing; Decoding; MVPA; Neuroimaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30268846     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  26 in total

1.  Intrinsic Connectivity Patterns of Task-Defined Brain Networks Allow Individual Prediction of Cognitive Symptom Dimension of Schizophrenia and Are Linked to Molecular Architecture.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Veronika I Müller; Juergen Dukart; Felix Hoffstaedter; Justin T Baker; Avram J Holmes; Deniz Vatansever; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat; Xiaojin Liu; Birgit Derntl; Lydia Kogler; Renaud Jardri; Oliver Gruber; André Aleman; Iris E Sommer; Simon B Eickhoff; Kaustubh R Patil
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Structural differences in adolescent brains can predict alcohol misuse.

Authors:  Roshan Prakash Rane; Evert Ferdinand de Man; JiHoon Kim; Kai Görgen; Mira Tschorn; Michael A Rapp; Tobias Banaschewski; Arun L W Bokde; Sylvane Desrivieres; Herta Flor; Antoine Grigis; Hugh Garavan; Penny A Gowland; Rüdiger Brühl; Jean-Luc Martinot; Marie-Laure Paillere Martinot; Eric Artiges; Frauke Nees; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Herve Lemaitre; Tomas Paus; Luise Poustka; Juliane Fröhner; Lauren Robinson; Michael N Smolka; Jeanne Winterer; Robert Whelan; Gunter Schumann; Henrik Walter; Andreas Heinz; Kerstin Ritter
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Learning in Visual Regions as Support for the Bias in Future Value-Driven Choice.

Authors:  Sara Jahfari; Jan Theeuwes; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Distinct neural representations of content and ordinal structure in auditory sequence memory.

Authors:  Ying Fan; Qiming Han; Simeng Guo; Huan Luo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Functional and diffusion MRI reveal the neurophysiological basis of neonates' noxious-stimulus evoked brain activity.

Authors:  Eugene Duff; Rebeccah Slater; Luke Baxter; Fiona Moultrie; Sean Fitzgibbon; Marianne Aspbury; Roshni Mansfield; Matteo Bastiani; Richard Rogers; Saad Jbabdi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  How to remove or control confounds in predictive models, with applications to brain biomarkers.

Authors:  Darya Chyzhyk; Gaël Varoquaux; Michael Milham; Bertrand Thirion
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Neurobiological Divergence of the Positive and Negative Schizophrenia Subtypes Identified on a New Factor Structure of Psychopathology Using Non-negative Factorization: An International Machine Learning Study.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Kaustubh R Patil; Susanne Weis; Kang Sim; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat; Juan Zhou; André Aleman; Iris E Sommer; Edith J Liemburg; Felix Hoffstaedter; Ute Habel; Birgit Derntl; Xiaojin Liu; Jona M Fischer; Lydia Kogler; Christina Regenbogen; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Jeffrey A Stanley; Valentin Riedl; Renaud Jardri; Oliver Gruber; Aristeidis Sotiras; Christos Davatzikos; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 12.810

8.  Cross-Scanner Harmonization of Neuromelanin-Sensitive MRI for Multisite Studies.

Authors:  Kenneth Wengler; Clifford Cassidy; Marieke van der Pluijm; Jodi J Weinstein; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Elsmarieke van de Giessen; Guillermo Horga
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.119

9.  Neurobiological substrates of the positive formal thought disorder in schizophrenia revealed by seed connectome-based predictive modeling.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Tobias Wensing; Felix Hoffstaedter; Edna C Cieslik; Veronika I Müller; Kaustubh R Patil; André Aleman; Birgit Derntl; Oliver Gruber; Renaud Jardri; Lydia Kogler; Iris E Sommer; Simon B Eickhoff; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 10.  TAPAS: An Open-Source Software Package for Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Eduardo A Aponte; Saskia Bollmann; Kay H Brodersen; Cao T Do; Olivia K Harrison; Samuel J Harrison; Jakob Heinzle; Sandra Iglesias; Lars Kasper; Ekaterina I Lomakina; Christoph Mathys; Matthias Müller-Schrader; Inês Pereira; Frederike H Petzschner; Sudhir Raman; Dario Schöbi; Birte Toussaint; Lilian A Weber; Yu Yao; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.