Joseph Catapano1, Mark Shafarenko2, Emily S Ho3, Ronald M Zuker1, Gregory H Borschel1. 1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The sural nerve is a common donor site for nerve reconstruction. The only study describing outcomes in paediatric patients was following bilateral sural nerve harvest before the age of 1 year. Bilateral nerve harvest at such a young age may limit patients' ability to perceive a sensory difference. The objective of this study was to understand the sensory and functional deficit after unilateral sural nerve harvest in paediatric patients. METHODS: A prospective case series was performed in children (age 6-18 years) following unilateral sural nerve harvest. The contralateral foot was used as a control. Sensory Threshold Evaluation was performed by Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test (WEST) - Foot, and a Functional Sensory and Pain Questionnaire was administered. Sural nerve harvest was performed by a minimally invasive technique using a nerve stripper. RESULTS: Twenty-eight feet of 14 patients that underwent unilateral sural nerve harvest were assessed. As a group, the 14 feet with sural nerve harvest demonstrated significantly higher thresholds in the four areas tested (p <0.05), thus identifying objective sensory loss at each location. The location of sensory loss in each patient was variable, with heavier sensory thresholds detected in 69.6% of areas tested than those in the corresponding location in the contralateral foot. Greater sensory loss was detected at the proximal lateral foot than at the distal lateral foot. Responses to the questionnaire revealed that only one patient perceived a sensory loss that affected their function. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral sural nerve harvest in paediatric patients resulted in measurable sensory loss. Despite loss of innervation, only two patients reported intermittent dysaesthesia or cold sensitivity, and the majority of the patients reported no functional deficit.
BACKGROUND: The sural nerve is a common donor site for nerve reconstruction. The only study describing outcomes in paediatric patients was following bilateral sural nerve harvest before the age of 1 year. Bilateral nerve harvest at such a young age may limit patients' ability to perceive a sensory difference. The objective of this study was to understand the sensory and functional deficit after unilateral sural nerve harvest in paediatric patients. METHODS: A prospective case series was performed in children (age 6-18 years) following unilateral sural nerve harvest. The contralateral foot was used as a control. Sensory Threshold Evaluation was performed by Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test (WEST) - Foot, and a Functional Sensory and Pain Questionnaire was administered. Sural nerve harvest was performed by a minimally invasive technique using a nerve stripper. RESULTS: Twenty-eight feet of 14 patients that underwent unilateral sural nerve harvest were assessed. As a group, the 14 feet with sural nerve harvest demonstrated significantly higher thresholds in the four areas tested (p <0.05), thus identifying objective sensory loss at each location. The location of sensory loss in each patient was variable, with heavier sensory thresholds detected in 69.6% of areas tested than those in the corresponding location in the contralateral foot. Greater sensory loss was detected at the proximal lateral foot than at the distal lateral foot. Responses to the questionnaire revealed that only one patient perceived a sensory loss that affected their function. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral sural nerve harvest in paediatric patients resulted in measurable sensory loss. Despite loss of innervation, only two patients reported intermittent dysaesthesia or cold sensitivity, and the majority of the patients reported no functional deficit.