Literature DB >> 30268531

Effect of Clot Stiffness on Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Lytic Susceptibility in Vitro.

Karla P Mercado-Shekhar1, Robert T Kleven2, Hermes Aponte Rivera3, Ryden Lewis3, Kunal B Karani3, Hendrik J Vos4, Todd A Abruzzo5, Kevin J Haworth6, Christy K Holland6.   

Abstract

The lytic recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is the only drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating ischemic stroke. Less than 40% of patients with large vessel occlusions who are treated with rt-PA have improved blood flow. However, up to 6% of all patients receiving rt-PA develop intracerebral hemorrhage. Predicting the efficacy of rt-PA treatment a priori could help guide therapeutic decision making, such that rt-PA is administered only to those individuals who would benefit from this treatment. Clot composition and structure affect the lytic efficacy of rt-PA and have an impact on elasticity. However, the relationship between clot elasticity and rt-PA lytic susceptibility has not been adequately investigated. The goal of this study was to quantify the relationship between clot elasticity and rt-PA susceptibility in vitro. Human and porcine highly retracted and mildly retracted clots were fabricated in glass pipettes. The rt-PA lytic susceptibility was evaluated in vitro using the percent clot mass loss. The Young's moduli of the clots were estimated using ultrasound-based single-track-location shear wave elasticity imaging. The percent mass loss in mildly retracted porcine and human clots (28.9 ± 6.1% and 45.2 ± 7.1%, respectively) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in highly retracted porcine and human clots (10.9 ± 2.1% and 25.5 ± 10.0%, respectively). Furthermore, the Young's moduli of highly retracted porcine and human clots (5.33 ± 0.92 and 3.21 ± 1.97 kPa, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of mildly retracted porcine and human clots (2.66 ± 0.55 and 0.79 ± 0.21 kPa, respectively). The results revealed an inverse relationship between the percent clot mass loss and Young's modulus. These findings motivate continued investigation of ultrasound-based methods to assess clot stiffness in order to predict rt-PA thrombolytic efficacy.
Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine 8 Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clot composition; Clot stiffness; Lytic efficacy; Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; Shear wave imaging; Ultrasound elastography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30268531      PMCID: PMC6551517          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  11 in total

1.  Effect of Stiffness of Large Extravascular Hematomas on Their Susceptibility to Boiling Histotripsy Liquefaction in Vitro.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; John C Kucewicz; Ekaterina M Ponomarchuk; Christopher Hunter; Matthew Bruce; Vera A Khokhlova; Thomas J Matula; Wayne Monsky
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Design and Characterization of an Ultrasound Transducer for Combined Histotripsy-Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Kevin J Haworth; Christy K Holland; Samuel A Hendley; Wayne Kreider; Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  In Vivo Porcine Aged Deep Vein Thrombosis Model for Testing Ultrasound-based Thrombolysis Techniques.

Authors:  Greyson E Stocker; Jiaqi Shi; Kimberly Ives; Adam D Maxwell; Paul A Dayton; Xiaoning Jiang; Zhen Xu; Gabe E Owens
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Effect of Thrombin and Incubation Time on Porcine Whole Blood Clot Elasticity and Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Susceptibility.

Authors:  Chadi Zemzemi; Matthew Phillips; Deborah C Vela; Nicole A Hilvert; John M Racadio; Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  In Vitro Thrombolytic Efficacy of Single- and Five-Cycle Histotripsy Pulses and rt-PA.

Authors:  Viktor Bollen; Samuel A Hendley; Jonathan D Paul; Adam D Maxwell; Kevin J Haworth; Christy K Holland; Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  In vitro assessment of stiffness-dependent histotripsy bubble cloud activity in gel phantoms and blood clots.

Authors:  Samuel A Hendley; Viktor Bollen; Gregory J Anthony; Jonathan D Paul; Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  In vitro characterization of sonothrombolysis and echocontrast agents to treat ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Robert T Kleven; Tao Peng; Arunkumar Palaniappan; Kunal B Karani; Shaoling Huang; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Accelerated sonothrombolysis with Definity in a xenographic porcine cerebral thromboembolism model.

Authors:  Robert T Kleven; Kunal B Karani; Nicole Hilvert; Samantha M Ford; Karla P Mercado-Shekhar; John M Racadio; Marepalli B Rao; Todd A Abruzzo; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  (More than) doubling down: Effective fibrinolysis at a reduced rt-PA dose for catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with histotripsy.

Authors:  Samuel A Hendley; Aarushi Bhargava; Christy K Holland; Geoffrey D Wool; Osman Ahmed; Jonathan D Paul; Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterizing blood clots using acoustic radiation force optical coherence elastography and ultrasound shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Hsiao-Chuan Liu; Mehdi Abbasi; Yong Hong Ding; Tuhin Roy; Margherita Capriotti; Yang Liu; Seán Fitzgerald; Karen M Doyle; Murthy Guddati; Matthew W Urban; Waleed Brinjikji
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.