Literature DB >> 30268469

Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Mina Georgieva1, Joao P da Silveira Nogueira Lima2, Pedro Aguiar3, Gilberto de Lima Lopes4, Benjamin Haaland5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy has dramatically shifted therapeutic perspectives for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed cost-effectiveness of anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab compared to platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC.
METHODS: We retrieved survival, progression, and safety data comparing first-line pembrolizumab to platinum-doublets for advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, non-mutated EGFR, and non-translocated ALK, from KEYNOTE-024. Published United Kingdom (UK) and United States (US) costs informed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Our analysis was based on a Bayesian Markov model of disease with full lifetime horizon. We estimated costs in USD and summarized effectiveness as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
RESULTS: Patients treated with pembrolizumab accumulated 1.80 QALYs (95% CrI 1.56-1.89), for moderate dependency between outcomes, compared to 1.06 QALYs (0.94-1.13) with chemotherapy. From a British National Health System (NHS) perspective, the ICER was $52k ($43k-$69k) per end-of-life (EoL) adjusted QALY gained, above the 42k USD threshold, while from a US cost perspective, the ICER was $49k ($40k-67k) per EoL adjusted QALY, below the hypothetical 100k USD threshold.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests first-line pembrolizumab for NSCLC may be cost-effective in the US but not the UK, in spite of very similar ICER values in both countries.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian Markov model; Cost-effectiveness; First-line therapy; Immunotherapy; NSCLC; Pembrolizumab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30268469     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  18 in total

1.  Pembrolizumab vs the EXTREME Regimen in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Yitian Lang; Deshi Dong; Bin Wu
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Economic Evaluations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Na Li; Huanrui Zheng; Bin Zheng; Chaoxin Chen; Hongfu Cai; Maobai Liu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: First-Line Avelumab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Peiyao Lu; Weiting Liang; Jiahao Li; Yanming Hong; Zhuojia Chen; Tao Liu; Pei Dong; Hongbing Huang; Tiantian Zhang; Jie Jiang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with varying comorbidity burden.

Authors:  Steven D Criss; Lauren Palazzo; Tina R Watson; Adelle M Paquette; Keith Sigel; Juan Wisnivesky; Chung Yin Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels.

Authors:  Xiuhua Weng; Shaohong Luo; Shen Lin; Lixian Zhong; Meiyue Li; Rao Xin; Pinfang Huang; Xiongwei Xu
Journal:  Oncol Res       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 5.574

6.  Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in China: an economic analysis based on a randomised, open-label, phase III trial.

Authors:  Wenxiu Xin; Haiying Ding; Qilu Fang; Xiaowei Zheng; Yinghui Tong; Gaoqi Xu; Guonong Yang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  First-Line Durvalumab Plus Platinum-Etoposide Versus Platinum-Etoposide for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Longfeng Zhang; Yongfu Hang; Maobai Liu; Na Li; Hongfu Cai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  A Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Pembrolizumab Regimens for the Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nan Qiao; Ralph Insinga; Gilberto de Lima Lopes Junior; John Cook; Martin Sénécal
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2021-01-19

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the USA.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zeng; Xiaomin Wan; Liubao Peng; Ye Peng; Fang Ma; Qiao Liu; Chongqing Tan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with PD-L1 test for the first-line treatment of NSCLC.

Authors:  Ning Wan; Tian-Tian Zhang; Si-Hua Hua; Zi-Luo Lu; Bo Ji; Li-Xia Li; Li-Qing Lu; Wen-Jie Huang; Jie Jiang; Jian Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.