Literature DB >> 30268454

Targeted lung cancer screening selects individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease.

H Balata1, S Blandin Knight1, P Barber1, D Colligan2, E J Crosbie3, R Duerden4, P Elton5, M Evison1, M Greaves4, J Howells6, K Irion7, D Karunaratne7, M Kirwan8, A Macnab9, S Mellor10, C Miller9, T Newton10, J Novasio11, R Sawyer4, A Sharman4, K Slevin8, E Smith4, B Taylor11, S Taylor2, J Tonge2, A Walsham12, S Waplington2, J Whittaker13, R Booton1, P A J Crosbie14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in populations eligible for lung cancer screening. The aim of this study was to determine whether a brief CV risk assessment, delivered as part of a targeted community-based lung cancer screening programme, was effective in identifying individuals at high risk who might benefit from primary prevention.
METHODS: The Manchester Lung Screening Pilot consisted of annual low dose CT (LDCT) over 2 screening rounds, targeted at individuals in deprived areas at high risk of lung cancer (age 55-74 and 6-year risk ≥1.51%, using PLCOM2012 risk model). All participants of the second screening round were eligible to take part in the study. Ten-year CV risk was estimated using QRISK2 in participants without CVD and compared to age (±5 years) and sex matched Health Survey for England (HSE) controls; high risk was defined as QRISK2 score ≥10%. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) was assessed on LDCT scans and compared to QRISK2 score.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent (n=920/1,194) of screening attendees were included in the analysis; mean age 65.6 ± 5.4 and 50.4% female. QRISK2 and lung cancer risk (PLCOM2012) scores were correlated (r = 0.26, p < 0.001). Median QRISK2 score was 21.1% (IQR 14.9-29.6) in those without established CVD (77.6%, n = 714/920), double that of HSE controls (10.3%, IQR 6.6-16.2; n = 714) (p < 0.001). QRISK2 score was significantly higher in those with CAC (p < 0.001). Screening attendees were 10-fold more likely to be classified high risk (OR 10.2 [95% CI 7.3-14.0]). One third (33.7%, n = 310/920) of all study participants were high risk but not receiving statin therapy for primary CVD prevention. DISCUSSION: Opportunistic CVD risk assessment within a targeted lung cancer screening programme is feasible and is likely to identify a very large number of individuals suitable for primary prevention.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular risk; Community based; Lung cancer screening; QRISK

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30268454     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in a lung cancer screening cohort.

Authors:  Mamta Ruparel; Samantha L Quaife; Jennifer L Dickson; Carolyn Horst; Stephen Burke; Magali Taylor; Asia Ahmed; Penny Shaw; May-Jan Soo; Arjun Nair; Anand Devaraj; Emma Louise O'Dowd; Angshu Bhowmik; Neal Navani; Karen Sennett; Stephen W Duffy; David R Baldwin; Reecha Sofat; Riyaz S Patel; Aroon Hingorani; Sam M Janes
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 9.102

Review 2.  Cardiac Toxicity of Thoracic Radiotherapy: Existing Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kathryn Banfill; Meredith Giuliani; Marianne Aznar; Kevin Franks; Alan McWilliam; Matthias Schmitt; Fei Sun; Marie Catherine Vozenin; Corinne Faivre Finn
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Current role of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer treatment.

Authors:  Luciano Bulgarelli Maqueda; Ricardo A J Luengo Falcón; Chiao-Yun Tsai; Alejandro García-Pérez; Anna Minasyan; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2020-09-02

4.  Low-dose CT for lung cancer screening: position paper from the Italian college of thoracic radiology.

Authors:  Mario Silva; Giulia Picozzi; Nicola Sverzellati; Sandra Anglesio; Maurizio Bartolucci; Edoardo Cavigli; Annalisa Deliperi; Massimo Falchini; Fabio Falaschi; Domenico Ghio; Paola Gollini; Anna Rita Larici; Alfonso V Marchianò; Stefano Palmucci; Lorenzo Preda; Chiara Romei; Carlo Tessa; Cristiano Rampinelli; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 6.313

5.  Analysis of lung cancer risk model (PLCOM2012 and LLPv2) performance in a community-based lung cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Mikey B Lebrett; Haval Balata; Matthew Evison; Denis Colligan; Rebecca Duerden; Peter Elton; Melanie Greaves; John Howells; Klaus Irion; Devinda Karunaratne; Judith Lyons; Stuart Mellor; Amanda Myerscough; Tom Newton; Anna Sharman; Elaine Smith; Ben Taylor; Sarah Taylor; Anna Walsham; James Whittaker; Phil V Barber; Janet Tonge; Hilary A Robbins; Richard Booton; Philip A J Crosbie
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 9.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.