| Literature DB >> 30268053 |
Jaroslav Semerád1, Monika Čvančarová2, Jan Filip3, Josef Kašlík3, Jana Zlotá2, Jana Soukupová3, Tomáš Cajthaml4.
Abstract
Nano-scale zero-valent iron (nZVI) began attracting research attention in remediation practice in recent decades as a prospective nanomaterial applicable to various contaminated matrices. Despite concerns about the negative effects of nanomaterials on ecosystems, the number of reliable toxicity tests is limited. We have developed a test based on the evaluation of oxidative stress (OS). The test employed the analysis of a typical OS marker (malondialdehyde, MDA), after exposure of six bacterial strains to the tested nanomaterial. We also attempted to use other OS and cell membrane damage assays, including the determination of glutathione and lactate dehydrogenase, respectively. However, we found that the components of these assays interfered with nZVI; therefore, these tests were not applicable. The MDA assay was tested using nZVI and three newly engineered oxide shell nZVI materials with different oxide thicknesses. Six different bacterial species were employed, and the results showed that the test was fully applicable for the concentrations of nanomaterials used in remediation practice (0.1-10 g/L). MDA was produced in a dose-response manner, and the bacteria showed a similar response toward pure pyrophoric nZVI, reaching EC50 values of 0.3-1.1 g/L. We observed different responses in the absolute production of MDA; however, the MDA concentrations were correlated with the cell membrane surfaces of the individual strains (R > 0.75; P < 0.09). Additionally, the EC50 values correlated with the thickness of the oxide shells (except for Escherichia coli: R > 0.95; P < 0.05), documenting the reliability of the assay, where reactivity was confirmed to be an important factor for reactive oxygen species production.Entities:
Keywords: Malondialdehyde; Oxidative stress; Reactive oxygen species; Remediation; Toxicity assay; nZVI
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30268053 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemosphere ISSN: 0045-6535 Impact factor: 7.086