Literature DB >> 30267993

Preparation and in vivo biocompatibility studies of different mesoporous bioactive glasses.

Akrity Anand1, V Lalzawmliana2, Vinod Kumar2, Piyali Das2, K Bavya Devi3, Asit Kumar Maji2, Biswanath Kundu4, Mangal Roy3, Samit Kumar Nandi5.   

Abstract

A new generation of nanostructured glasses called mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs) exhibit superior surface texture, porosity and bioactive characteristics. The present study is carried out to develop and detailed characterize of ternary SiO2-CaO-P2O5 MBG structure, fabricated by three different variations using different surfactants, e.g., hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), poly-ethylene glycol,(PEG) and Pluronic P123. After thorough physico-chemical characterization, MBG granules were investigated for in vivo bone regeneration in animal bone defect model (rabbit) where standard S53P4 bioactive glass was used as control. All the synthesized MBG powders showed nano-range median particle size of 80-120 nm (MBG-CTAB), 50-70 nm (MBG-PEG and MBG-P123) while their specific surface area as 473.2, 52.2 and 169.3 m2/g respectively. All MBGs showed mesoporous nature corroborating transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation as well. Bone regeneration property was measured after 45 and 90 days post-implantation at distal epiphysis of rabbit femur by radiography, histology, fluorochrome labeling, micro computed tomography (micro-CT) and vital organ histology. Results from in vivo studies indicated that the MBG materials produce minimal toxicity to the body. Furthermore, the biocompatibility and biodegradability of the implant makes them more suitable for application in bone tissue engineering. Among various implants, MBG fabricated using suitable surfactant (CTAB) shown the best result compared to other implants. Nonetheless, all the materials are suitable for application in bone tissue engineering and have potential for bone regeneration and healing.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histology; In vivo; Material characterization; Mesoporous bioactive glass; Micro-CT; Radiography; Surfactants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267993     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  4 in total

1.  Multifunctional antibiotic- and zinc-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds to fight bone infection.

Authors:  C Heras; J Jiménez-Holguín; A L Doadrio; M Vallet-Regí; S Sánchez-Salcedo; A J Salinas
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 10.633

Review 2.  Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Margaux Salètes; Marta Vartin; Caroline Mocquot; Charlène Chevalier; Brigitte Grosgogeat; Pierre Colon; Nina Attik
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-23

Review 3.  Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy: Stimuli-Responsive, Toxicity, Immunogenicity, and Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Esmaeel Sharifi; Ashkan Bigham; Satar Yousefiasl; Maria Trovato; Matineh Ghomi; Yasaman Esmaeili; Pouria Samadi; Ali Zarrabi; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Shokrollah Sharifi; Rossella Sartorius; Farnaz Dabbagh Moghaddam; Aziz Maleki; Hao Song; Tarun Agarwal; Tapas Kumar Maiti; Nasser Nikfarjam; Colin Burvill; Virgilio Mattoli; Maria Grazia Raucci; Kai Zheng; Aldo R Boccaccini; Luigi Ambrosio; Pooyan Makvandi
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 16.806

4.  Study of Sr-Ca-Si-based scaffolds for bone regeneration in osteoporotic models.

Authors:  Qianju Wu; Xiao Wang; Fei Jiang; Ziyuan Zhu; Jin Wen; Xinquan Jiang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.