Literature DB >> 30267987

UCBG 2-08: 5-year efficacy results from the UNICANCER-PACS08 randomised phase III trial of adjuvant treatment with FEC100 and then either docetaxel or ixabepilone in patients with early-stage, poor prognosis breast cancer.

Mario Campone1, Magali Lacroix-Triki2, Lise Roca3, Marc Spielmann2, Hans Wildiers4, Paul Cottu5, Pierre Kerbrat6, Christelle Levy7, Isabelle Desmoulins8, Thomas Bachelot9, Tan Winston10, Jean-Christophe Eymard11, Lionel Uwer12, Francois P Duhoux13, Didier Verhoeven14, Dominique Jaubert15, David Coeffic16, Hubert Orfeuvre17, Jean Luc Canon18, Bernard Asselain5, Anne-Laure Martin19, Jerome Lemonnier19, Henri Roché20.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: UNICANCER-PACS08 compared adjuvant FEC (5-FU; epirubicin; cyclophosphamide) then docetaxel to FEC then ixabepilone in poor prognosis early breast cancer (BC). We evaluated whether replacing docetaxel with ixabepilone would increase 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or oestrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)-/HER2- BC patients were randomised to receive standard FEC (3 cycles) followed by 3 cycles of either docetaxel (100 mg/m2) or ixabepilone (40 mg/m2). Radiotherapy was mandatory after conservative surgery; ER+ patients received endocrine therapy.
RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-two patients were enrolled between October 2007 and September 2010. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. Median follow-up was 66.7 months. Median DFS was not reached; 5-year DFS rate was 76% with docetaxel and 79% with ixabepilone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.10; p = 0.175). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 5-year OS rate was 86% versus 84% (HR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.66-1.42; p = 0.897). TNBC patients treated with ixabepilone had a 23% lower risk of relapse compared to docetaxel (HR for DFS = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.53-1.11; p = 0.168). DFS was longer with ixabepilone than docetaxel in patients with grade II-III lymphocytic infiltration (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.29-1.05; p = 0.063). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse events (AEs): 75% reported grade III-IV AEs and two (<1%) had grade V AEs (both with neutropenia and infection receiving ixabepilone).
CONCLUSION: After adjuvant FEC, ixabepilone was comparable to docetaxel for treating poor prognosis early BC patients. The benefit of ixabepilone in subgroups (patients with TNBC and grade II-III lymphocytic infiltration) requires further evaluation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant chemotherapy; Docetaxel; Early breast cancer; Ixabepilone; Poor prognosis breast cancer; Triple-negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267987     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  2 in total

1.  Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies.

Authors:  Ellen Cusano; Chelsea Wong; Eddy Taguedong; Marcus Vaska; Tasnima Abedin; Nancy Nixon; Safiya Karim; Patricia Tang; Daniel Y C Heng; Doreen Ezeife
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Ixabepilone: Overview of Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nuhad K Ibrahim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.