Literature DB >> 30267730

The fixation-related lambda response: Effects of saccade magnitude, spatial frequency, and ocular artifact removal.

Anthony J Ries1, David Slayback2, Jon Touryan2.   

Abstract

Fixation-related potentials (FRPs) enable examination of electrophysiological signatures of visual perception under naturalistic conditions, providing a neural snapshot of the fixated scene. The most prominent FRP component, commonly referred to as the lambda response, is a large deflection over occipital electrodes (O1, Oz, O2) peaking 80-100 ms post fixation, reflecting afferent input to visual cortex. The lambda response is affected by bottom-up stimulus features and the size of the preceding saccade; however, prior research has not adequately controlled for these influences in free viewing paradigms. The current experiment (N = 16, 1 female) addresses these concerns by systematically manipulating spatial frequency in a free-viewing task requiring a range of saccade sizes. Given the close temporal proximity between saccade related activity and the onset of the lambda response, we evaluate how removing independent components (IC) associated with ocular motion artifacts affects lambda response amplitude. Our results indicate that removing ocular artifact ICs based on the covariance with gaze position did not significantly affect the amplitude of this occipital potential. Moreover, the results showed that spatial frequency and saccade magnitude each produce significant effects on lambda amplitude, where amplitude decreased with increasing spatial frequency and increased as a function of saccade size for small and medium-sized saccades. The amplitude differences between spatial frequencies were maintained across all saccade magnitudes suggesting these effects are produced from distinctly different and uncorrelated mechanisms. The current results will inform future analyses of the lambda potential in natural scenes where saccade magnitudes and spatial frequencies ultimately vary.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267730     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  5 in total

1.  Fixation-related saccadic inhibition in free viewing in response to stimulus saliency.

Authors:  Oren Kadosh; Yoram S Bonneh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications.

Authors:  Olaf Dimigen; Benedikt V Ehinger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  A Case for Studying Naturalistic Eye and Head Movements in Virtual Environments.

Authors:  Chloe Callahan-Flintoft; Christian Barentine; Jonathan Touryan; Anthony J Ries
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Neural correlates of intra-saccadic motion perception.

Authors:  Gaëlle Nicolas; Eric Castet; Adrien Rabier; Emmanuelle Kristensen; Michel Dojat; Anne Guérin-Dugué
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Psychophysical dual-task setups do not measure pre-saccadic attention but saccade-related strengthening of sensory representations.

Authors:  Christoph Huber-Huber; Julia Steininger; Markus Grüner; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.016

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.