Literature DB >> 30267670

Advancing Rehabilitation Practice Through Improved Specification of Interventions.

Jeanne M Zanca1, Lyn S Turkstra2, Christine Chen3, Andrew Packel4, Mary Ferraro4, Tessa Hart4, Jarrad H Van Stan5, John Whyte4, Marcel P Dijkers6.   

Abstract

Rehabilitation clinicians strive to provide cost-effective, patient-centered care that optimizes outcomes. A barrier to this ideal is the lack of a universal system for describing, or specifying, rehabilitation interventions. Current methods of description vary across disciplines and settings, creating barriers to collaboration, and tend to focus mostly on functional deficits and anticipated outcomes, obscuring connections between clinician behaviors and changes in functioning. The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is the result of more than a decade of effort by a multidisciplinary group of rehabilitation clinicians and researchers to develop a theory-based framework to specify rehabilitation interventions. The RTSS describes interventions for treatment components, which consist of a target (functional change brought about as a direct result of treatment), ingredients (actions taken by clinicians to change the target), and a hypothesized mechanism of action, as stated in a treatment theory. The RTSS makes explicit the connections between functional change and clinician behavior, and recognizes the role of patient effort in treatment implementation. In so doing, the RTSS supports clinicians' efforts to work with their patients to set achievable goals, select appropriate treatments, adjust treatment plans as needed, encourage patient participation in the treatment process, communicate with team members, and translate research findings to clinical care. The RTSS may help both expert and novice clinicians articulate their clinical reasoning processes in ways that benefit treatment planning and clinical education, and may improve the design of clinical documentation systems, leading to more effective justification and reimbursement for services. Interested clinicians are invited to apply the RTSS in their local settings.
Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Patient outcome assessment; Patient participation; Rehabilitation; Therapeutics; Volition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267670     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  3 in total

1.  A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.

Authors:  Victoria A Diedrichs; Jennifer P Lundine; Deena Schwen Blackett; Alexandra Zezinka Durfee; Xueliang Jeff Pan; Stacy M Harnish
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Mapping Meta-Therapy in Voice Interventions onto the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.

Authors:  Leah B Helou; Jackie L Gartner-Schmidt; Edie R Hapner; Sarah L Schneider; Jarrad H Van Stan
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.761

3.  The Template for Intervention Description and Replication as a Measure of Intervention Reporting Quality: Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Marcel P Dijkers; Scott R Millis
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-04-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.