Literature DB >> 30267669

A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments.

Tessa Hart1, Marcel P Dijkers2, John Whyte3, Lyn S Turkstra4, Jeanne M Zanca5, Andrew Packel3, Jarrad H Van Stan6, Mary Ferraro3, Christine Chen7.   

Abstract

The field of rehabilitation remains captive to the black-box problem: our inability to characterize treatments in a systematic fashion across diagnoses, settings, and disciplines, so as to identify and disseminate the active ingredients of those treatments. In this article, we describe the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS), by which any treatment employed in rehabilitation may be characterized, and ultimately classified according to shared properties, via the 3 elements of treatment theory: targets, ingredients, and (hypothesized) mechanisms of action. We discuss important concepts in the RTSS such as the distinction between treatments and treatment components, which consist of 1 target and its associated ingredients; and the distinction between targets, which are the direct effects of treatment, and aims, which are downstream or distal effects. The RTSS includes 3 groups of mutually exclusive treatment components: Organ Functions, Skills and Habits, and Representations. The last of these comprises not only thoughts and feelings, but also internal representations underlying volitional action; the RTSS addresses the concept of volition (effort) as a critical element for many rehabilitation treatments. We have developed an algorithm for treatment specification which is illustrated and described in brief. The RTSS stands to benefit the field in numerous ways by supplying a coherent, theory-based framework encompassing all rehabilitation treatments. Using a common framework, researchers will be able to test systematically the effects of specific ingredients on specific targets; and their work will be more readily replicated and translated into clinical practice.
Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Classification; Patient outcome assessment; Patient participation; Rehabilitation; Therapeutics; Volition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267669     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  17 in total

1.  The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Implications for Improvements in Research Design, Reporting, Replication, and Synthesis.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Marcel P Dijkers; John Whyte; Tessa Hart; Lyn S Turkstra; Jeanne M Zanca; Christine Chen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Voice Therapy According to the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Expert Consensus Ingredients and Targets.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; John Whyte; Joseph R Duffy; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Patricia Doyle; Shirley Gherson; Lisa Kelchner; Jason Muise; Brian Petty; Nelson Roy; Joseph Stemple; Susan Thibeault; Carol Jorgensen Tolejano
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Automatic Estimation of Laryngeal Vestibule Closure Duration Using High- Resolution Cervical Auscultation Signals.

Authors:  Aliaa Sabry; Amanda S Mahoney; Shitong Mao; Yassin Khalifa; Ervin Sejdić; James L Coyle
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2020-12-14

Review 4.  Organization of Rehabilitation Services in Randomized Controlled Trials: Which Factors Influence Functional Outcome? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cecilie Røe; Erik Bautz-Holter; Nada Andelic; Helene Lundgaard Søberg; Boya Nugraha; Christoph Gutenbrunner; Andrea Boekel; Marit Kirkevold; Grace Engen; Juan Lu
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2022-04-13

5.  A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.

Authors:  Victoria A Diedrichs; Jennifer P Lundine; Deena Schwen Blackett; Alexandra Zezinka Durfee; Xueliang Jeff Pan; Stacy M Harnish
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Mapping Meta-Therapy in Voice Interventions onto the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.

Authors:  Leah B Helou; Jackie L Gartner-Schmidt; Edie R Hapner; Sarah L Schneider; Jarrad H Van Stan
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.761

7.  Quantitative Assessment of Learning and Retention in Virtual Vocal Function Exercises.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Se-Woong Park; Matthew Jarvis; Joseph Stemple; Robert E Hillman; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The Template for Intervention Description and Replication as a Measure of Intervention Reporting Quality: Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Marcel P Dijkers; Scott R Millis
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-04-23

9.  Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia.

Authors:  Lucy Dipper; Jane Marshall; Mary Boyle; Deborah Hersh; Nicola Botting; Madeline Cruice
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-02

Review 10.  Treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  John DeLuca; Nancy D Chiaravalloti; Brian M Sandroff
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.