Literature DB >> 30267654

Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.

Yunho Jung1, Young-Eun Joo2, Hyun Gun Kim3, Seong Ran Jeon3, Jae Myung Cha4, Hyo-Joon Yang5, Jong Wook Kim6, Jun Lee7, Kyeong Ok Kim8, Hye Kyung Song9, Young Hwangbo10, Jeong Eun Shin11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Appropriate colonoscopy withdrawal times for individual colonic segments are not well known. The relationship between withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate (ADR)/polyp detection rate (PDR) in individual colonic segments was examined in this study.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study involving 724 patients who underwent colonoscopy screening or surveillance colonoscopy from October 2015 to February 2017 at 10 university hospitals.
RESULTS: In the right side of the colon, the ADR (33.2% vs 13.7%, P < .001), PDR, serrated polyp detection rate, and number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) were significantly higher when the colonoscopy withdrawal time was ≥2 minutes compared with <2 minutes. When the withdrawal time was ≥4 minutes in the proximal colon and ≥3 minutes in the left segment of the colon, the ADR, PDR, and APC were significantly higher compared with withdrawal times of <4 minutes and <3 minutes, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that the ADR was significantly associated with withdrawal times of ≥2 minutes in the right side of the colon (odds ratio [OR], 2.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-5.15; P < .001), ≥4 minutes in the proximal colon (OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 3.15-6.36; P < .001), and ≥3 minutes in the left segment of the colon (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.74-4.91; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The PDR and ADR appeared to be significantly increased when the withdrawal time was ≥2 minutes in the right-sided colon segment, ≥4 minutes in the proximal colon, and ≥3 minutes in the left-sided colon segment compared with shorter withdrawal times.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267654     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  10 in total

1.  The right time for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Maria Moris
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05-17

2.  Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Xiaobo Wang; Haiyang Guo; Yong Tang; Lin Chen; Xianfei Wang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 3.  Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality.

Authors:  Su Bee Park; Jae Myung Cha
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.

Authors:  Maryan Cavicchi; Gaëlle Tharsis; Pascal Burtin; Philippe Cattan; Franck Venezia; Gilles Tordjman; Agnès Gillet; Joëlle Samama; Karine Nahon-Uzan; David Karsenti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of the starting position during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Daeho Park; Eiichi Kakehi; Kazuoki Inoue; Shizukiyo Ishikawa; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Martin Buerger; Philipp Kasper; Gabriel Allo; Johannes Gillessen; Christoph Schramm
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Retroflexion, a costless endoscopic maneuver, increases adenoma detection rate in the ascending colon.

Authors:  Spyridon Michopoulos; Georgios Axiaris; Panagiotis Baxevanis; Maria Stoupaki; Vassiliki Gkagkari; Georgios Leonidakis; Evanthia Zampeli; Maria Sotiropoulou; Kalliopi Petraki
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-12

8.  Impact of Moderate versus Deep Sedation and Trainee Participation on Adenoma Detection Rate-Analysis of a Veteran Population.

Authors:  Hemnishil K Marella; Nasir Saleem; Claudio Tombazzi
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2020-12-15

9.  Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of polyp detection.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Xinjue He; Jianbo Zhou; Jie Zhang; Xinli Mao; Guoliang Ye; Qiang Chen; Feng Xu; Jianzhong Sang; Jun Wang; Yong Ding; Youming Li; Chaohui Yu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Multicentre randomised controlled trial on virtual chromoendoscopy in the detection of neoplasia during colitis surveillance high-definition colonoscopy (the VIRTUOSO trial).

Authors:  Kesavan Kandiah; Sharmila Subramaniam; Sreedhari Thayalasekaran; Fergus Jq Chedgy; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Carole Fogg; James F Brown; Samuel Cl Smith; Marietta Iacucci; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 23.059

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.