| Literature DB >> 30266677 |
Tomasz Czerw1, Maria Sadus-Wojciechowska2, Katarzyna Michalak2, Jacek Najda2, Wlodzimierz Mendrek2, Malgorzata Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka2, Magdalena Glowala-Kosinska2, Agata Chwieduk2, Iwona Mitrus2, Andrzej Smagur2, Jerzy Holowiecki2, Sebastian Giebel2.
Abstract
Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) may be done using either steady-state granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or a combination of chemotherapy with G-CSF. The goal of this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial was to compare the efficacy of chemomobilization using intermediate-dose cytarabine (ID-AraC) plus G-CSF with G-CSF alone in patients with MM referred for tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). The percentage of patients with stem cell yield of at least 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg was the primary endpoint. Ninety patients were enrolled, including 44 assigned to the ID-AraC arm and 46 in the G-CSF arm. The threshold number of CD34+ cells was reached in 43 patients (98%) in the ID-AraC arm and in 32 patients (70%) in the G-CSF arm (P = .0003). The median number of collected CD34+ cells was 20.2 × 106 cells/kg in the ID-AraC arm versus 5.9 × 106 cells/kg in the G-CSF arm (P < .000001). A single apheresis was sufficient to achieve the required number of harvested CD34+ cells in 37 patients (86%) in the ID-AraC arm and in 13 patients (41%) in the G-CSF arm (P = .00008). The times to both neutrophil and platelet recovery after autoSCT were significantly shorter in the patients mobilized with ID-AraC. This study provides the first evidence of the advantage of chemomobilization over G-CSF monotherapy in terms of efficacy. ID-AraC with G-CSF should be the preferred chemomobilization protocol for patients with MM scheduled to undergo tandem autoSCT.Entities:
Keywords: Hematopoietic cell processing; Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization; Intermediate-dose cytarabine; Multiple myeloma; Stem cell transplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30266677 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742