Literature DB >> 30266677

Increased Efficacy of Stem Cell Chemomobilization with Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Compared with G-CSF Alone in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Tomasz Czerw1, Maria Sadus-Wojciechowska2, Katarzyna Michalak2, Jacek Najda2, Wlodzimierz Mendrek2, Malgorzata Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka2, Magdalena Glowala-Kosinska2, Agata Chwieduk2, Iwona Mitrus2, Andrzej Smagur2, Jerzy Holowiecki2, Sebastian Giebel2.   

Abstract

Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) may be done using either steady-state granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or a combination of chemotherapy with G-CSF. The goal of this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial was to compare the efficacy of chemomobilization using intermediate-dose cytarabine (ID-AraC) plus G-CSF with G-CSF alone in patients with MM referred for tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). The percentage of patients with stem cell yield of at least 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg was the primary endpoint. Ninety patients were enrolled, including 44 assigned to the ID-AraC arm and 46 in the G-CSF arm. The threshold number of CD34+ cells was reached in 43 patients (98%) in the ID-AraC arm and in 32 patients (70%) in the G-CSF arm (P = .0003). The median number of collected CD34+ cells was 20.2 × 106 cells/kg in the ID-AraC arm versus 5.9 × 106 cells/kg in the G-CSF arm (P < .000001). A single apheresis was sufficient to achieve the required number of harvested CD34+ cells in 37 patients (86%) in the ID-AraC arm and in 13 patients (41%) in the G-CSF arm (P = .00008). The times to both neutrophil and platelet recovery after autoSCT were significantly shorter in the patients mobilized with ID-AraC. This study provides the first evidence of the advantage of chemomobilization over G-CSF monotherapy in terms of efficacy. ID-AraC with G-CSF should be the preferred chemomobilization protocol for patients with MM scheduled to undergo tandem autoSCT.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hematopoietic cell processing; Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization; Intermediate-dose cytarabine; Multiple myeloma; Stem cell transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30266677     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current status of autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rama Al Hamed; Abdul Hamid Bazarbachi; Florent Malard; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.037

2.  High Efficacy of Stem Cell Mobilization With Etoposide+Cytarabine Plus G-CSF in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Zhijuan Zhu; Xiaofan Li; Yiping Liu; Ping Chen; Xianling Chen; Hua Li; Jiafu Huang; Yuanzhong Chen; Nainong Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chengxin Luo; Guixian Wu; Xiangtao Huang; Yali Zhang; Yanni Ma; Yarui Huang; Zhen Huang; Hui Li; Yu Hou; Jieping Chen; Xi Li; Shuangnian Xu
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 4.  Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Hillard M Lazarus; Parastoo B Dahi; Scott Avecilla; Sergio A Giralt
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 10.626

Review 5.  Stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: how far have we come?

Authors:  Cinnie Y Soekojo; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2019-11-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.