Literature DB >> 30266484

Inequalities in childhood vaccination timing and completion in London.

Karen S Tiley1, Joanne M White2, Nick Andrews3, Mary Ramsay4, Michael Edelstein5.   

Abstract

The UK primary vaccination course includes vaccination against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP/IPV/Hib) and is scheduled at ages four, 8 and 12 weeks, followed by a 'preschool booster' at age three years four months. Vaccine coverage is generally measured at age one, two and five years. In addition to high coverage, vaccination should be timely to maximise population protection. Vaccination histories for 315,381 children born March 2001 to April 2010 were extracted from Child Health Information Systems in nine London health service areas and grouped into first and fifth birthday cohorts. We assessed timeliness of receipt of DTaP/IPV/Hib and drop-out rates by ethnicity, deprivation and area. Most children received their first, second and third doses on time at two, three, and four months. Among children completing by one year and after adjusting for deprivation and health area, compared with White-British children, Somali and Bangladeshi children were less likely to have received three doses of DTaP/IPV/Hib by six months of age (-11% and -5% respectively). Differences in timeliness by deprivation and health area existed, but were smaller. Compared with White-British children, children of Polish, Somali and Caribbean ethnicities were less likely to return for preschool booster, with a drop-out rate at least 7% higher in these groups. Within the fifth birthday cohort, only 2.3% of children who were completely unvaccinated (575/25,095) at age one year were fully vaccinated by age five. Higher proportions of partially vaccinated (one or two doses) children at age one year went on to be fully vaccinated by age five ((836/3213) 26.0% and (3565/6076) 58.7% respectively). These inequalities suggest that tailored approaches may be required to target specific groups with regards to improving vaccine uptake. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deprivation; Ethnicity; Inequalities; Late; Timing; Vaccine coverage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30266484     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  3 in total

1.  What school-level and area-level factors influenced HPV and MenACWY vaccine coverage in England in 2016/2017? An ecological study.

Authors:  Karen Tiley; Joanne White; Nick Andrews; Elise Tessier; Mary Ramsay; Michael Edelstein
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  What is the cost of delivering routine vaccinations at GP practices in England? A comparative time-driven activity-based costing analysis.

Authors:  Tim Crocker-Buque; Kitty Mohan; Mary Ramsay; Michael Edelstein; Sandra Mounier-Jack
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Parents' and guardians' views on the acceptability of a future COVID-19 vaccine: A multi-methods study in England.

Authors:  Sadie Bell; Richard Clarke; Sandra Mounier-Jack; Jemma L Walker; Pauline Paterson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.641

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.