Literature DB >> 30266255

Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients Who Underwent Implantation of Permanent Pacemaker After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Fahd Nadeem1, Takahiro Tsushima1, Thomas P Ladas1, Rahul B Thomas1, Sandeep M Patel1, Petar Saric1, Toral Patel1, Jerry Lipinski2, Jun Li1, Marco A Costa1, Daniel I Simon1, Ankur Kalra1, Guillherme F Attizzani1, Mauricio S Arruda1, Judith Mackall1, Sergio G Thal3.   

Abstract

Atrioventricular conduction disturbances requiring implantation of permanent pacemaker (PPM) are a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Previous registry data are conflicting but suggestive of an increased risk in heart failure admissions in the post-TAVI PPM cohort. Given the expanding use of TAVI, the present study evaluates the effects of chronic right ventricular pacing (RV pacing) in post-TAVI patients. This is a single-center study of 672 patients who underwent TAVI from 2011 to 2017 of which 146 underwent PPM. Follow-up 1-year post-TAVI outcome data were available for 55 patients and were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who underwent PPM were more likely to have heart failure admissions (17.1% vs 10.1%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 2.64; p 0.019) and a trend toward increased mortality (21.9% vs 15.4%; HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.99 to 2.05; p 0.062). At 1-year follow-up, 30 of 55 (54.5%) patients demonstrated >40% RV pacing. Compared with patients who had <40% RV pacing, those with >40% RV pacing were more likely to have heart failure admissions (8% vs 40%; HR 5.0; 95% CI 1.23 to 20.27; p 0.007) and demonstrated a trend toward increased mortality (12% vs 33.3%; HR 2.78; 95% CI 0.86 to 9.00; p 0.064). This is suggestive that the post-TAVI PPM cohort is particularly sensitive to chronic RV pacing.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30266255     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.07.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shun Xu; Enrui Zhang; Zhiyong Qian; Jinyu Sun; Fengwei Zou; Yao Wang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 2.  Rate and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Current Status.

Authors:  Eleonora Russo; Domenico R Potenza; Michela Casella; Raimondo Massaro; Giulio Russo; Maurizio Braccio; Antonio Dello Russo; Mauro Cassese
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2019

3.  Coronary Angiography After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) to Evaluate the Risk of Coronary Access Impairment After TAVR-in-TAVR.

Authors:  Luca Nai Fovino; Andrea Scotti; Mauro Massussi; Francesco Cardaioli; Giulio Rodinò; Yuji Matsuda; Andrea Pavei; Giulia Masiero; Massimo Napodano; Chiara Fraccaro; Tommaso Fabris; Giuseppe Tarantini
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  One-year pacing dependency after pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Justine M Ravaux; Michele Di Mauro; Kevin Vernooy; Arnoud W Van't Hof; Leo Veenstra; Suzanne Kats; Jos G Maessen; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-02-12

5.  Long-term clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Zito; Giuseppe Princi; Marco Lombardi; Domenico D'Amario; Rocco Vergallo; Cristina Aurigemma; Enrico Romagnoli; Gemma Pelargonio; Piergiorgio Bruno; Carlo Trani; Francesco Burzotta; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.486

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.