C Verity Bennett1, Sabine Maguire2, Diane Nuttall2, Daniel M Lindberg3, Steven Moulton4, Lalit Bajaj3, Alison M Kemp2, Stephen Mullen5. 1. Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, United Kingdom. Electronic address: bennettcv@cardiff.ac.uk. 2. Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, United States. 4. Division of Paediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, United States; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, United States. 5. Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, United Kingdom; Paediatric Emergency Department, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Falls Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, United Kingdom.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Appropriate first aid can reduce the morbidity of burns, however, there are considerable variations between international first aid recommendations. We aim to identify, and compare first aid practices in children who present to Emergency Departments (ED) with a burn. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of 500 children (0-16 completed years) presenting with a burn to a paediatric ED in the UK (Cardiff) and the USA (Denver, Colorado), during 2015-2017. The proportion of children who had received some form of first aid and the quality of first aid were compared between cities. RESULTS: Children attending hospital with a burn in Cardiff were 1.47 times more likely (RR 1.47; CI 1.36, 1.58), to have had some form of first aid than those in Denver. Denver patients were 4.7 time more likely to use a dressing and twice as likely to apply ointment/gel/aloe vera than the Cardiff cohort. First aid consistent with local recommendations was only administered to 26% (128/500) of children in Cardiff and 6% (31/500) in Denver. Potentially harmful first aid e.g. application of food, oil, toothpaste, shampoo or ice was applied to 5% of children in Cardiff and 10% in Denver. CONCLUSION: A low number of children received optimal burns first aid, with potentially harmful methods applied in a considerable proportion of cases. There is an urgent need for internationally agreed, evidence-based burn first aid recommendations. Crown
INTRODUCTION: Appropriate first aid can reduce the morbidity of burns, however, there are considerable variations between international first aid recommendations. We aim to identify, and compare first aid practices in children who present to Emergency Departments (ED) with a burn. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of 500 children (0-16 completed years) presenting with a burn to a paediatric ED in the UK (Cardiff) and the USA (Denver, Colorado), during 2015-2017. The proportion of children who had received some form of first aid and the quality of first aid were compared between cities. RESULTS:Children attending hospital with a burn in Cardiff were 1.47 times more likely (RR 1.47; CI 1.36, 1.58), to have had some form of first aid than those in Denver. Denver patients were 4.7 time more likely to use a dressing and twice as likely to apply ointment/gel/aloe vera than the Cardiff cohort. First aid consistent with local recommendations was only administered to 26% (128/500) of children in Cardiff and 6% (31/500) in Denver. Potentially harmful first aid e.g. application of food, oil, toothpaste, shampoo or ice was applied to 5% of children in Cardiff and 10% in Denver. CONCLUSION: A low number of children received optimal burns first aid, with potentially harmful methods applied in a considerable proportion of cases. There is an urgent need for internationally agreed, evidence-based burn first aid recommendations. Crown