Literature DB >> 30266085

The advantage of parallel selection of domestication genes to accelerate crop improvement.

Martha Rendón-Anaya1, Alfredo Herrera-Estrella2.   

Abstract

A recent study identifies a locus controlling seed dormancy - a key trait of the 'domestication syndrome' - that has been selected for in parallel across multiple crop families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30266085      PMCID: PMC6161459          DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1537-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Biol        ISSN: 1474-7596            Impact factor:   13.583


Introduction

Ten to twelve thousand years ago, in different regions around the world, humans launched an intriguing ‘co-evolutionary experiment’ – the domestication of crop plants and farm animals. In the case of crops, domestication was expected to generate more-productive plants, better adapted to different agro-ecosystems and easier to harvest and/or producing edible products that were safer to consume. Although the species and locations vary, domestication events are typically associated with the series of morphological changes that collectively are known as the ‘domestication syndrome’. This encompasses cultivars with large non-dispersing seeds, uniform germination, photoperiod insensitivity, reduced branching and several nutrition-related phenotypes. The emergence of such phenotypic traits of morpho-agronomic relevance shared by different crops prompts a question regarding whether similarities in human demands regarding cultivation, harvest and consumption led to widespread convergent artificial selection of genes (Fig. 1). A recent study by Wang and colleagues [1] shed lights on this interesting issue.
Fig. 1

Examples of parallel selection of protein-coding genes across plant families. Depicted are: maize, Z. mays; rice, O. sativa; sorghum, S. bicolor; soybean, G. max; and tomato, S. lycopersicum

Examples of parallel selection of protein-coding genes across plant families. Depicted are: maize, Z. mays; rice, O. sativa; sorghum, S. bicolor; soybean, G. max; and tomato, S. lycopersicum Traditional genetic screenings and large-scale genomic studies have allowed the identification of a number of domestication-related genes that, in many cases, are particular to each domestication history, even within the same plant genus [2-4]. More recently, the combination of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and metabolome-based genome-wide association studies (mGWAS) has shown that domestication has rewired several metabolic and transcriptional networks [5]. In addition, the fact that genetic backgrounds can have pervasive effects on gene interactions, such as dominance, pleiotropy and epistasis [2], and considering the dynamism of genomic introgression between cultivars and their wild relatives, it becomes challenging to conclude with any confidence how many paths are necessary to achieve similar domestication phenotypes.

Convergence of domestication traits and their genetic background

Domestication has occurred across varied cultures and geography. Even though there has been a strong convergence in terms of the evolution of domestication-related traits in different crop families, there are few examples where one single gene has been equally affected by artificial selection in distantly related species (Shattering1 in cereals [6]). More often, parallel selection has occurred within a single plant species or genus. Broadly, domestication could be considered as an experiment replicated multiple times, given that domesticated crops tend to experience selective pressures that drive them towards shared phenotypic shifts [7]. This scenario implies that, if genes were selected in parallel, the number of genetic solutions to the challenge of domestication would be under constraint. However, a recent analysis of domestication – considering it an experimental evolution assay – [3] found no evidence for parallel selection events either between species (maize vs rice) or within species (two domestication events within beans).

From seed coat pigmentation to dormancy – Two traits, one gene in common

Seed dormancy delays and desynchronizes germination under unsuitable environmental conditions for plant growth. In the wild, this is a useful strategy that promotes seed dispersal and warrants that at least some seeds will germinate and survive when conditions are favourable. In domesticated cultivars, however, it is desirable to have uniform germination to ensure maturity and crop management by farmers. Thus, the loss of seed dormancy has been a crucial trait selected for during crop domestication. Different studies have associated dozens of QTLs to seed dormancy in cereals and legumes, which explain a rather discrete amount of phenotypic variation. In a recent report by Wang and collaborators [1], a stay-green locus, the G gene (GmG) encoding a CAAX amino-terminal protease and controlling the pigmentation of the seed coat, was found to be strongly associated with the loss of seed dormancy in soybean. Not only does this gene display signatures of strong selection in soybean, but its orthologs in rice (OsG) and tomato (SolyG) are also encoded within genomic regions with signatures of selective sweeps, as seen by tests of FST, cross-population composite likelihood ratio (XP-CLR) and extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH). Based on genome resequencing of 176 rice accessions and a large available collection of wild and domesticated cultivars, it was observed that two groups of haplotypes in the population differentiate wild (group I) from domesticated Indica and Japonica accessions (group II). Similarly, in a large collection of 360 resequenced accessions, it was demonstrated that cherry (CER) and big-fruited (BIG) tomato cultivars displayed a non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; C allele) that differentiated them from the G allele present in the wild Solanum pimpinellifolium. Experimental validation of the role of the G locus in seed dormancy was achieved using transgenic soybean and rice lines – that is, GmG introduced into a g allele soybean cultivar (DN50), OsG introduced into a g allele cultivated rice line (ZH11), a CRISPR knockout of Osg in ZH11, overexpression of two OsG alleles from Oryza rufipogon and Osg in ZH11. In all these combinations, the G allele was confirmed to cause a strong dormancy phenotype compared with the g form of the locus. Furthermore, GmG introduced in Arabidopsis atg mutants complemented the fast-germinating phenotype, showing that this gene is also involved in seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. The function and possible interactors of the G protein were evaluated by means of yeast two-hybrid assays. Arabidopsis AtG was found to interact with two key enzymes of the abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthetic pathway – AtNCED3 and AtPSY. Both ABA and several carotenoids were observed to be more abundant in AtG than atg lines, as well as in transgenic soybean lines overexpressing GmG compared with Gmg cultivars. The results of this study confirm the role of ABA in seed dormancy as previously reported, but, more importantly, they show for the first time that the same protein-coding gene has been targeted by artificial selection in three distant crop families, Leguminosae, Poaceae and Solanaceae (Fig. 1), and possibly even in Brassicaceae, given its contribution to seed dormancy in Arabidopsis.

Future directions

As plant breeding has traditionally been based on phenotype-targeted selection, it becomes crucial to dissect the genetic elements behind relevant morpho-agronomic traits to improve crops with great precision and efficiency. Furthermore, crop breeding does not rely uniquely on direct selection, but also on the effects of linked loci that hitchhike during introgression events, such as metabolic genes hitchhiking with fruit weight genes as large tomato fruits were selected, or metabolic genes from inedible green-fruited species dragged by resistance genes from wild relatives [5]. In the past few years, our understanding of crop domestication has evolved from the view of a few large-effect loci to polygenic interactions that alter complex networks. In this context, the results reported by Wang and colleagues provide an excellent candidate for targeted breeding, as the introduction of a limited number of G/g alleles identified in distant plant families could potentially decrease the seed dormancy phenotype in other crops. Thus, high-throughput molecular breeding combined with precise genome editing should accelerate crop improvement and even, perhaps, domestication of plant species capable of growing under unforeseen environmental conditions, which could be crucial in the near future when facing changeable climatic conditions.
  7 in total

1.  Evolution Is an Experiment: Assessing Parallelism in Crop Domestication and Experimental Evolution: (Nei Lecture, SMBE 2014, Puerto Rico).

Authors:  Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Parallel selection on a dormancy gene during domestication of crops from multiple families.

Authors:  Min Wang; Wenzhen Li; Chao Fang; Fan Xu; Yucheng Liu; Zheng Wang; Rui Yang; Min Zhang; Shulin Liu; Sijia Lu; Tao Lin; Jiuyou Tang; Yiqin Wang; Hongru Wang; Hao Lin; Baoge Zhu; Mingsheng Chen; Fanjiang Kong; Baohui Liu; Dali Zeng; Scott A Jackson; Chengcai Chu; Zhixi Tian
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record.

Authors:  Dorian Q Fuller; Tim Denham; Manuel Arroyo-Kalin; Leilani Lucas; Chris J Stevens; Ling Qin; Robin G Allaby; Michael D Purugganan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Soybean domestication: the origin, genetic architecture and molecular bases.

Authors:  Eric J Sedivy; Faqiang Wu; Yoshie Hanzawa
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Rewiring of the Fruit Metabolome in Tomato Breeding.

Authors:  Guangtao Zhu; Shouchuang Wang; Zejun Huang; Shuaibin Zhang; Qinggang Liao; Chunzhi Zhang; Tao Lin; Mao Qin; Meng Peng; Chenkun Yang; Xue Cao; Xu Han; Xiaoxuan Wang; Esther van der Knaap; Zhonghua Zhang; Xia Cui; Harry Klee; Alisdair R Fernie; Jie Luo; Sanwen Huang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Maize domestication and gene interaction.

Authors:  Michelle C Stitzer; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Parallel domestication of the Shattering1 genes in cereals.

Authors:  Zhongwei Lin; Xianran Li; Laura M Shannon; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Ming L Wang; Guihua Bai; Zhao Peng; Jiarui Li; Harold N Trick; Thomas E Clemente; John Doebley; Patrick S Schnable; Mitchell R Tuinstra; Tesfaye T Tesso; Frank White; Jianming Yu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 38.330

  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetic insights in pearl millet breeding in the genomic era: challenges and prospects.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Usha Nara
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol Rep       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.496

2.  New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled.

Authors:  David L Van Tassel; Omar Tesdell; Brandon Schlautman; Matthew J Rubin; Lee R DeHaan; Timothy E Crews; Aubrey Streit Krug
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 3.  Sorghum breeding in the genomic era: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Huaiqing Hao; Zhigang Li; Chuanyuan Leng; Cheng Lu; Hong Luo; Yuanming Liu; Xiaoyuan Wu; Zhiquan Liu; Li Shang; Hai-Chun Jing
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 5.574

Review 4.  The Orthodox Dry Seeds Are Alive: A Clear Example of Desiccation Tolerance.

Authors:  Angel J Matilla
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22

Review 5.  Progress in soybean functional genomics over the past decade.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Shulin Liu; Zhao Wang; Yaqin Yuan; Zhifang Zhang; Qianjin Liang; Xia Yang; Zongbiao Duan; Yucheng Liu; Fanjiang Kong; Baohui Liu; Bo Ren; Zhixi Tian
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 9.803

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.