Literature DB >> 30265929

PAHs in urban soils of two Florida cities: Background concentrations, distribution, and sources.

Yungen Liu1, Peng Gao2, Jing Su3, Evandro B da Silva4, Letúzia M de Oliveira4, Timothy Townsend3, Ping Xiang5, Lena Q Ma6.   

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous organic contaminants, which are found in soils throughout the U.S. The objective of this study was to determine the background concentrations, distributions, and sources of 16 USEPA priority PAHs in two urban soils. A total of 114 soil samples were collected from two large cities in Florida: Orlando and Tampa. The results showed that soils were dominated by high molecular weight PAHs in both cities. The average ∑16-PAHs in Orlando and Tampa soils were 3227 and 4562 μg kg-1, respectively. The averages of 7 carcinogenic PAHs based on the benzo[a]pyrene-equivalent (BaP-EQ) concentrations in the two cities were 452 and 802 μg kg-1. BaP-EQ concentrations in 60-62% of samples were higher than the Florida Soil Cleanup Target Level (FSCTL) for residential soils at 100 μg kg-1 and 20-25% of samples were higher than FSCTL for industrial soils at 700 μg kg-1. Based on molecular diagnostic ratios and PMF modeling, major sources of soil PAHs in both cities were similar, mainly from pyrogenic sources including vehicle emissions, and biomass and coal combustion. Based on ArcGIS mapping, PAH concentrations in soils near business districts and high traffic roads were higher. Thus, it is important to consider background PAH concentrations in urban soils when considering soil remediation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Molecular diagnostic ratio; PMF modeling; Soil cleanup standards; Urban soils; benzo[a]pyrene-equivalent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265929     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  6 in total

1.  Precision environmental health monitoring by longitudinal exposome and multi-omics profiling.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Xiaotao Shen; Xinyue Zhang; Chao Jiang; Sai Zhang; Xin Zhou; Sophia Miryam Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 9.438

2.  Environmental Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Farmland Soils near Highways: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Xiaorong Zhang; Weiqing Lu; Linyu Xu; Wenhao Wu; Bowen Sun; Wenfeng Fan; Hanzhong Zheng; Jingjing Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Contamination level, sources, and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in suburban vegetable field soils of Changchun, Northeast China.

Authors:  Zhengwu Cui; Yang Wang; Liansheng Du; Yong Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Alkylated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Are the Largest Contributor to Polycyclic Aromatic Compound Concentrations in the Topsoil of Huaibei Coalfield, China.

Authors:  Yahui Qian; Zhenpeng Xu; Xiuping Hong; Zhonggeng Luo; Xiulong Gao; Cai Tie; Handong Liang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Surface horizons of forest soils for the diagnosis of soil environment contamination and toxicity caused by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  Paulina Chaber; Barbara Gworek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Distribution, Origins and Hazardous Effects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Topsoil Surrounding Oil Fields: A Case Study on the Loess Plateau, China.

Authors:  Di Wang; Shilei Zhu; Lijing Wang; Qing Zhen; Fengpeng Han; Xingchang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.