Literature DB >> 30265884

Value of MR-US fusion in guidance of repeated prostate biopsy in men with PSA < 10 ng/mL.

Sung Il Hwang1, Hak Jong Lee2, Sang Eun Lee3, Sung Kyu Hong3, Seok-Soo Byun3, Sang Chul Lee3, Gheeyoung Choe4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We want to investigate whether MR-US fusion can improve the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with prior negative prostate biopsy with PSA level <10 ng/mL.
METHODS: Thirty nine patients who had previous a history of negative prostate biopsy and PSA levels <10 ng/mL were included in this study. MR was performed before the biopsy and graded using PIRADS V2. We labeled patients with index lesions with PIRADS scores of 3 or above as the MR-positive group, while patients with PIRADS scores of 1 or 2 were the MR-negative group. Two cores of added biopsy (AB) were performed per each index lesion under MR-US fusion. Twelve cores randomized systematic biopsy (SB) were followed. In MR negative group, two cores of AB were obtained in transition zone, followed by SB. Overall cancer and clinically significant cancer detection rates by patients and by cores were analyzed, and compared between MR-positive and negative group.
RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rates were 51.3% by patient based and 13.8% by core based. While all of AB positive cancer patients were clinically significant cancer patients, five out of seven (71.4%) AB negative cancer patients were clinically insignificant cancer patients. AB results turned another four cancer patients from insignificant to significant cancer. The cancer detection rates between MR-positive and negative group were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional biopsy using MR-US fusion showed improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusion biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265884     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  7 in total

1.  Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting prostate cancer in men with prostate-specific antigen grey zone based on retrospective analysis of clinical and multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-derived data.

Authors:  Zhimin Ding; Huaiyu Wu; Di Song; Hongtian Tian; Xiuqin Ye; Weiyu Liang; Yang Jiao; Jintao Hu; Jinfeng Xu; Fajin Dong
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-10

Review 2.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E J Bass; A Pantovic; M J Connor; S Loeb; A R Rastinehad; M Winkler; Rhian Gabe; H U Ahmed
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.455

3.  A Proteomic Platform Unveils the Brain Glycogen Phosphorylase as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Giusy Ferraro; Matteo Mozzicafreddo; Roberta Ettari; Lorenzo Corsi; Maria Chiara Monti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Image-guided Raman spectroscopy navigation system to improve transperineal prostate cancer detection. Part 1: Raman spectroscopy fiber-optics system and in situ tissue characterization.

Authors:  Fabien Picot; Roozbeh Shams; Frédérick Dallaire; Guillaume Sheehy; Tran Trang; David Grajales; Mirela Birlea; Dominique Trudel; Cynthia Ménard; Samuel Kadoury; Frédéric Leblond
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.758

5.  Prognostic value of seminal vesicle invasion on preoperative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in pathological stage T3b prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jung Kwon Kim; Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Gheeyoung Choe; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparing Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Category 1 and 2 Groups: Clinical Implication of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jung Kwon Kim; Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Gheeyoung Choe; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison of pain levels in fusion prostate biopsy and standard TRUS-Guided biopsy.

Authors:  Abdullah Demirtaş; Gökhan Sönmez; Şevket Tolga Tombul; Türev Demirtaş
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.