Mima Simic1, Catherine S Stewart1, Ivan Eisler1, Julian Baudinet1, Katrina Hunt1, Jayne O'Brien1, Beth McDermott1,2. 1. National and Specialist Child and Adolescent Eating Disorder Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 2. Northamptonshire Community Eating Disorder Team, Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Family Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa (FT-AN) is the first line treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa in the UK. However, research suggests between 10 and 40% of young people have a poor outcome. For those for whom FT-AN alone is not effective there is a clear need to develop additional treatments. This paper describes the effectiveness of an additional treatment for adolescents who had not responded to FT-AN, the Intensive Day Treatment Program (ITP) embedded within a comprehensive outpatient service at the Maudsley Hospital. METHOD: Data from a retrospective chart review of patient files were analyzed for 105 young people aged 11-18 with restrictive eating disorders referred to the program in the first four and a half years of its operation. RESULTS: Young people attended ITP for only on average 28.41 days. Over this time they made significant improvements in a range of domains, including weight gain, eating disorder symptomatology, motivation to recover, quality of life and comorbid symptomatology. Young people continued to make improvements post ITP in outpatient treatment provided by the same service and 73.2% had a good or an intermediate outcome at the point of discharge from the service. DISCUSSION: This uncontrolled case series indicates that ITP can contribute to positive outcomes for young people who require intensification of treatment. ITP outcomes are discussed in comparison to the published literature concerning day programs for adolescents with a diagnosis of an eating disorder.
OBJECTIVE: Family Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa (FT-AN) is the first line treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa in the UK. However, research suggests between 10 and 40% of young people have a poor outcome. For those for whom FT-AN alone is not effective there is a clear need to develop additional treatments. This paper describes the effectiveness of an additional treatment for adolescents who had not responded to FT-AN, the Intensive Day Treatment Program (ITP) embedded within a comprehensive outpatient service at the Maudsley Hospital. METHOD: Data from a retrospective chart review of patient files were analyzed for 105 young people aged 11-18 with restrictive eating disorders referred to the program in the first four and a half years of its operation. RESULTS: Young people attended ITP for only on average 28.41 days. Over this time they made significant improvements in a range of domains, including weight gain, eating disorder symptomatology, motivation to recover, quality of life and comorbid symptomatology. Young people continued to make improvements post ITP in outpatient treatment provided by the same service and 73.2% had a good or an intermediate outcome at the point of discharge from the service. DISCUSSION: This uncontrolled case series indicates that ITP can contribute to positive outcomes for young people who require intensification of treatment. ITP outcomes are discussed in comparison to the published literature concerning day programs for adolescents with a diagnosis of an eating disorder.
Authors: Angelique F Ralph; Leah Brennan; Sue Byrne; Belinda Caldwell; Jo Farmer; Laura M Hart; Gabriella A Heruc; Sarah Maguire; Milan K Piya; Julia Quin; Sarah K Trobe; Andrew Wallis; A J Williams-Tchen; Phillipa Hay Journal: J Eat Disord Date: 2022-08-18