Literature DB >> 30265613

American Joint Committee on Cancer's Staging System for Breast Cancer, Eighth Edition: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.

Sirishma Kalli1, Alan Semine1, Sara Cohen1, Stephen P Naber1, Shital S Makim1, Manisha Bahl1.   

Abstract

The TNM staging system for cancer was developed by Pierre Denoix in France in the 1940s and 1950s. The North American effort to standardize the TNM system for cancer staging was first organized in 1959 as the American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and End-Results Reporting, which is now the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). The most recent edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, the eighth edition, was globally adopted on January 1, 2018. Previous editions of the manual have relied on anatomic methods of staging alone, which used population-based survival data to predict clinical outcomes. In the era of precision medicine, the major change in the eighth edition is the incorporation of prognostic biomarkers to more accurately predict clinical outcomes and treatment response on an individual basis, without relying solely on the anatomic extent of disease. Factors such as tumor grade, hormone receptor and oncogene expression, and multigene panel recurrence scores are now integrated with anatomic information to yield a final prognostic stage group, which will provide better stratification of patient prognosis. The purpose of this article is to review the major changes in the AJCC eighth edition for breast cancer staging, review anatomic TNM staging, familiarize the radiologist with prognostic biomarkers and prognostic staging, and identify key sites of disease that may alter clinical management. ©RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265613     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018180056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  17 in total

1.  A Picture of Breast Reconstruction in a Public Oncology Hospital in Latin America: A Ten-Year Experience.

Authors:  Anne Karoline Groth; Maria Cecilia Closs Ono; Viktoria Weihermann; Luísa Zanatelli Brasil Bastos; Thamyle Moda de Santana Rezende; Deisy Brigid de Zorzi Dalke; Catharina Iagla Borssuk Ferreira
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-10-01

Review 2.  Staging of primary and secondary solid musculoskeletal tumors.

Authors:  Diogo Guilherme Leão Edelmuth; Paulo Victor Partezani Helito; Renée Zon Filippi; André Mathias Baptista; Marcelo Bordalo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  A Model Combining Skeletal Muscle Mass and a Hematological Biomarker to Predict Survival in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Han-Ying Huang; Fei Lin; Xiao-Yu Chen; Wen Wen; Shuang-Yan Xie; Zhi-Qing Long; Ling Guo; Huan-Xin Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Cysteine Cathepsins and Matrix Metalloproteases Among Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Solomon Tsegaye; Mohammed Mehdi; Wajana L Labisso; Daniel Seifu Melka
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2021-05-07

5.  Best MRI sequences for identifying axillary lymph node markers in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an inter-reader observational study.

Authors:  Naziya Samreen; Asha A Bhatt; Kalie Adler; Shannon Zingula; Katrina N Glazebrook
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-06-12

Review 6.  Applications of 3D printing in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Arpine Galstyan; Michael J Bunker; Fluvio Lobo; Robert Sims; James Inziello; Jack Stubbs; Rita Mukhtar; Tatiana Kelil
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2021-02-09

7.  MRI-Based Radiomics Nomogram: Prediction of Axillary Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ya Qiu; Xiang Zhang; Zhiyuan Wu; Shiji Wu; Zehong Yang; Dongye Wang; Hongbo Le; Jiaji Mao; Guochao Dai; Xuwei Tian; Renbing Zhou; Jiayi Huang; Lanxin Hu; Jun Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade.

Authors:  Andrew Lagree; Audrey Shiner; Marie Angeli Alera; Lauren Fleshner; Ethan Law; Brianna Law; Fang-I Lu; David Dodington; Sonal Gandhi; Elzbieta A Slodkowska; Alex Shenfield; Katarzyna J Jerzak; Ali Sadeghi-Naini; William T Tran
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Role of MRI in Breast Cancer Staging: A Case-Based Review.

Authors:  Swati Sharma; Fiorella G Vicenty-Latorre; Sherif Elsherif; Smita Sharma
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-27

10.  Comparison of nodal staging between CT, MRI, and [18F]-FDG PET/MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Janna Morawitz; Nils-Martin Bruckmann; Frederic Dietzel; Tim Ullrich; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Oliver Hoffmann; Eugen Ruckhäberle; Svjetlana Mohrmann; Lena Häberle; Marc Ingenwerth; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Lino Morris Sawicki; Katharina Breuckmann; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Ken Herrmann; Christian Buchbender; Gerald Antoch; Lale Umutlu; Julian Kirchner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.