Literature DB >> 30265338

Job stress and post-retirement health in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study.

K Walker-Bone1,2, S D'Angelo1,2, M Stevens1,2, C Linaker1,2, E Dennison2, C Cooper1,2,3,4, H Syddall1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Job demand-control (DC) and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) are two commonly used measures of work stress which are independently associated with health. AIMS: To test the hypothesis that DC and ERI have different and cumulative effects on health.
METHODS: DC and ERI were assessed in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. The characteristics and occupations of men and women reporting either or both work stresses were compared and the interaction of these with health status were explored.
RESULTS: Complete data were available for 1021 men and 753 women, reporting on their most recent or current job. A total of 647 (63%) men and 444 (59%) women reported neither work stress, while 103 (10%) men and 78 (10%) women reported both. Patterns of ERI and DC, alone and in combination, were different by type of occupation and by gender. Men reporting both work stresses (as compared with neither) were more likely to be single. Reported ERI with DC in the most recent or current job was associated with: poorer SF-36 physical function scores (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.5-3.7] for men; OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.2-3.6] for women) and mental health scores (OR 2.8 [95% CI 1.8-4.4] for men; OR 3.1 [95% CI 1.8-5.3] for women). Moreover, average grip strength was 1.7 kg (95% CI 0.2-3.3) lower among men who described both work stresses.
CONCLUSION: DC and ERI are two models of the psychosocial workplace environment which offer different but cumulative insight into the impacts of work on an individual's psychological and physical health, particularly in a population sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265338      PMCID: PMC6314463          DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqy123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  24 in total

1.  Job strain, effort--reward imbalance, and stress at work: competing or complementary models?

Authors:  Michael Calnan; Emma Wadsworth; Margaret May; Andrew Smith; David Wainwright
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Reviewing the effort-reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies.

Authors:  Natasja van Vegchel; Jan de Jonge; Hans Bosma; Wilmar Schaufeli
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Work stress in the etiology of coronary heart disease--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mika Kivimäki; Marianna Virtanen; Marko Elovainio; Anne Kouvonen; Ari Väänänen; Jussi Vahtera
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 4.  Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large-scale cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J de Jonge; H Bosma; R Peter; J Siegrist
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Psychosocial work environment and myocardial infarction: improving risk estimation by combining two complementary job stress models in the SHEEP Study.

Authors:  R Peter; J Siegrist; J Hallqvist; C Reuterwall; T Theorell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Is job strain a major source of cardiovascular disease risk?

Authors:  Karen L Belkic; Paul A Landsbergis; Peter L Schnall; Dean Baker
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Cohort Profile: the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  Michael Marmot; Eric Brunner
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  When reciprocity fails: effort-reward imbalance in relation to coronary heart disease and health functioning within the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  H Kuper; A Singh-Manoux; J Siegrist; M Marmot
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Cohort profile: the Hertfordshire cohort study.

Authors:  H E Syddall; A Aihie Sayer; E M Dennison; H J Martin; D J P Barker; C Cooper
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  A comparison between the effort-reward imbalance and demand control models.

Authors:  Aleck S Ostry; Shona Kelly; Paul A Demers; Cameron Mustard; Clyde Hertzman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  Resilience is strongly associated with health-related quality of life but does not buffer work-related stress in employed persons 1 year after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Inge Kirchberger; Katrin Burkhardt; Margit Heier; Christian Thilo; Christine Meisinger
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Effort-Reward Imbalance and Job Strain: A Composite Indicator Approach.

Authors:  Liza Jachens; Jonathan Houdmont
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.