Literature DB >> 30265317

Knowledge attitude and practice of Turkish health professionals towards pharmacovigilance in a university hospital.

Yusuf Ergün1, Tansel Bekiroğlu Ergün2, Eylem Toker2, Esengül Ünal3, Mine Akben2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacovigilance and spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have pivotal roles in drug safety. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practice of health professionals towards pharmacovigilance in a university hospital in Turkey.
METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study via a 25-item self-administered questionnaire was conducted among physicians (n=161) and nurses (n=321).
RESULTS: Although 66% (320/482) of the subjects were aware of the 'pharmacovigilance' term, the awareness of the Turkish Pharmacovigilance Center was as low as 30% (161/482). Similarly, 41% (198/482) of the subjects did not know the pharmacovigilance contact point of the hospital. Defining and determining new ADRs and improving patient safety were associated with the importance of spontaneous reporting by the subjects. According to the physicians, unawareness of the national pharmacovigilance system was the first discouraging factor, as was the unawareness of the need for spontaneous reporting of ADRs for the nurses. Although the frequency with which the nurses encountered ADRs was lower than that of the physicians, their claimed reporting ratio (21%; 68/321) was more than the physicians (8%; 12/161).
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant potential under-reporting of ADRs, which seems to be the result of several factors, including the lack of the knowledge of the national pharmacovigilance system.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse drug reaction; attitude; knowledge; nurses; pharmacovigilance; physicians; practice

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30265317     DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihy073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Health        ISSN: 1876-3405            Impact factor:   2.473


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacovigilance and radiologists: How well do they get along?

Authors:  Ozlem Celik Aydin; Sonay Aydin; Hakki Zafer Guney
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Post marketing surveillance of suspected adverse drug reactions through spontaneous reporting: current status, challenges and the future.

Authors:  Muaed Alomar; Ali M Tawfiq; Nageeb Hassan; Subish Palaian
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2020-08-10

3.  Adverse drug reactions reporting in Turkey and barriers: an urgent need for pharmacovigilance education.

Authors:  Zakir Khan; Yusuf Karataş; Hazir Rahman
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2020-05-07

4.  Rapid review of suspected adverse drug events due to remdesivir in the WHO database; findings and implications.

Authors:  Jaykaran Charan; Rimple Jeet Kaur; Pankaj Bhardwaj; Mainul Haque; Praveen Sharma; Sanjeev Misra; Brian Godman
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 5.045

5.  Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice in Relation to Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tahmine Salehi; Naiemeh Seyedfatemi; Mohammad Saeed Mirzaee; Maryam Maleki; Abbas Mardani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reactions in Paediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study in Turkish Hospital.

Authors:  Zakir Khan; Yusuf Karataş; Olcay Kıroğlu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Healthcare professionals' pharmacovigilance knowledge and adverse drug reaction reporting behavior and factors determining the reporting rates.

Authors:  Müberra Devrim Güner; Perihan Elif Ekmekci
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2019-01-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.