Christian P Selinger1,2, Alvin Odouri Ochieng1, Varun George1, Rupert W Leong3,4. 1. Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom. 2. Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. 3. Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 4. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adherence to maintenance medication for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is essential for disease control, albeit often poor. Adherence can be measured by drug metabolites, self-report tools, and prescription data. The aim of this study was to test implementation of self-report tools in IBD clinics by evaluating consistency and to validate them by correlation with drug metabolite levels and medication possession ratios (MPRs). METHODS: Ambulatory IBD patients on thiopurine maintenance therapy for >3 months were recruited. Patients self-reported adherence using a visual analog scale (VAS) and Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS). Thiopurine metabolites levels were assessed using blood, and MPRs were calculated from patient records as the reference standard. Consistency was assessed by McNemar's test (primary outcome), and correlation analysis was performed using Pearson tests. RESULTS: Of 96 patients (58 Crohn's disease, 33 ulcerative colitis, 5 IBD unclassified) 16.6% were classified as nonadherent based on thiopurine metabolites, 14.9% based on VAS, 13.2% based on MARS, and 22.9% based on MPR. VAS and MARS were consistent with thiopurine metabolites (McNemar test P = 0.79, P = 0.45). All 4 methods were consistent with each other when compared directly 1 to 1. Spearman's analysis demonstrated that all 4 methods significantly correlated with each other: (correlation between VAS and thiopurine metabolites: rho = 0.435; P < 0.001; and correlation between MARS and thiopurine metabolites: rho = 0.29; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Self-report tools correlate significantly with thiopurine metabolites and medication possession ratios. The Medication Adherence Report Scale and VAS are validated adherence assessment tools for IBD and can be used as simple screening tools in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Adherence to maintenance medication for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is essential for disease control, albeit often poor. Adherence can be measured by drug metabolites, self-report tools, and prescription data. The aim of this study was to test implementation of self-report tools in IBD clinics by evaluating consistency and to validate them by correlation with drug metabolite levels and medication possession ratios (MPRs). METHODS: Ambulatory IBDpatients on thiopurine maintenance therapy for >3 months were recruited. Patients self-reported adherence using a visual analog scale (VAS) and Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS). Thiopurine metabolites levels were assessed using blood, and MPRs were calculated from patient records as the reference standard. Consistency was assessed by McNemar's test (primary outcome), and correlation analysis was performed using Pearson tests. RESULTS: Of 96 patients (58 Crohn's disease, 33 ulcerative colitis, 5 IBD unclassified) 16.6% were classified as nonadherent based on thiopurine metabolites, 14.9% based on VAS, 13.2% based on MARS, and 22.9% based on MPR. VAS and MARS were consistent with thiopurine metabolites (McNemar test P = 0.79, P = 0.45). All 4 methods were consistent with each other when compared directly 1 to 1. Spearman's analysis demonstrated that all 4 methods significantly correlated with each other: (correlation between VAS and thiopurine metabolites: rho = 0.435; P < 0.001; and correlation between MARS and thiopurine metabolites: rho = 0.29; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Self-report tools correlate significantly with thiopurine metabolites and medication possession ratios. The Medication Adherence Report Scale and VAS are validated adherence assessment tools for IBD and can be used as simple screening tools in clinical practice.
Authors: Rihwa Choi; Mi Ryung Chun; Jisook Park; Ji Won Lee; Hee Young Ju; Hee Won Cho; Ju Kyung Hyun; Hong Hoe Koo; Eun Sang Yi; Soo-Youn Lee Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: James K Stone; Leigh Anne Shafer; Lesley A Graff; Lisa Lix; Kelcie Witges; Laura E Targownik; Clove Haviva; Kathryn Sexton; Charles N Bernstein Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Mervat M Alsous; Ahmed F Hawwa; Cameron Imrie; Andras Szabo; Eman Alefishat; Rana Abu Farha; Mohammad Rwalah; Rob Horne; James C McElnay Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-02-25