Literature DB >> 30265225

Endoscopic posterior decompression under local anesthesia for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Myung Soo Youn1, Jong Ki Shin2, Tae Sik Goh2, Seung Min Son3, Jung Sub Lee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVEVarious minimally invasive techniques have been described for the decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, few reports have described the results of endoscopic posterior decompression (EPD) with laminectomy performed under local anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of EPD performed under local anesthesia in patients with LSS and to compare the procedural outcomes in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis.METHODSFifty patients (28 female and 22 male) who underwent EPD under local anesthesia were included in this study. Patients were assessed before surgery and were followed up with regular outpatient visits (at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) outcome questionnaire. Radiological outcomes were assessed by measuring lumbar lordosis, disc-wedging angle, percentage of vertebral slippage, and disc height index on plain standing radiographs.RESULTSThe VAS, ODI, and SF-36 scores were significantly improved at 1 month after surgery compared to the baseline mean values, and the improved scores were maintained over the 2-year follow-up period. Radiological progression was found in 2 patients during the follow-up period. Patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis had no significant differences in their clinical and radiological outcomes.CONCLUSIONSEPD performed under local anesthesia is effective for LSS treatment. Similar favorable outcomes can be obtained in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis using this approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DHI = disc height index; EPD = endoscopic posterior decompression; LL = lumbar lordosis; LSS = lumbar spinal stenosis; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; VAS = visual analog scale; degenerative; endoscopic posterior decompression; local anesthesia; lumbar spinal stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265225     DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.SPINE171337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  13 in total

Review 1.  Effect of lumbar laminectomy on spinal sagittal alignment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juho Hatakka; Katri Pernaa; Juho Rantakokko; Inari Laaksonen; Mikhail Saltychev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Current state of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Yahya A Othman; Sohrab S Virk; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

3.  Full-endoscopic versus microscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis at L4-L5: comparative study.

Authors:  Kuo-Tai Chen; Kyung-Chul Choi; Hyeong-Ki Shim; Dong-Chan Lee; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

Authors:  Shuheng Zhai; Wenkui Zhao; Bin Zhu; Xin Huang; Chen Liang; Bao Hai; Lixiang Ding; Hongwei Zhu; Xianhai Wang; Feng Wei; Hongling Chu; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Is Asia truly a hotspot of contemporary minimally invasive and endoscopic spinal surgery?

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Anthony Yeung; Yadhu K Lokanath; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

6.  Regional variations in acceptance, and utilization of minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques among spine surgeons: results of a global survey.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; José-Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Xifeng Zhang; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sergio Soriano Solis; José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz; Carolina Ramírez Martínez; Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar; Kaixuan Liu; Qiang Fu; Marlon Sudário de Lima E Silva; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira de Carvalho; Stefan Hellinger; Álvaro Dowling; Nicholas Prada; Gun Choi; Girish Datar; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

7.  Does a high BMI affect the outcome of minimally invasive TLIF? A retrospective study of 207 patients.

Authors:  Ayush Sharma; Akash Shakya; Vijay Singh; Nilesh Mangale; Ghanshyam Kakadiya; Ajay Jaiswal; Nandan Marathe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Surgeon training and clinical implementation of spinal endoscopy in routine practice: results of a global survey.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; José-Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Xifeng Zhang; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sergio Soriano Solis; José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz; Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar; Marlon Sudário de Lima E Silva; Stefan Hellinger; Álvaro Dowling; Nicholas Prada; Gun Choi; Girish Datar; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

9.  Outcome of lumbar lateral recess stenosis with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression in patients 65 years of age or older and in younger patients.

Authors:  Xiaoxiang Li; Tao Liu; Junjun Fan; Hongtao Zhang; Chunbao Yang; Xin Yin; Haoran Gao; Jixian Qian; Siguo Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS® Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study.

Authors:  Boyu Wu; Chengjie Xiong; Linying Tan; Dongdong Zhao; Feng Xu; Hui Kang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.