Literature DB >> 30265060

Genetic influences on delayed reward discounting: A genome-wide prioritized subset approach.

James MacKillop1, Joshua C Gray2, Jessica Weafer3, Sandra Sanchez-Roige4, Abraham A Palmer4, Harriet de Wit3.   

Abstract

Delayed reward discounting (DRD) is a behavioral economic measure of impulsivity that has been consistently associated with addiction. It has also been identified as a promising addiction endophenotype, linking specific sources of genetic variation to individual risk. A challenge in the studies to date is that levels of DRD are often confounded with prior drug use, and previous studies have also had limited genomic scope. The current investigation sought to address these issues by studying DRD in healthy young adults with low levels of substance use (N = 986; 62% female, 100% European ancestry) and investigating genetic variation genome-wide. The genome-wide approach used a prioritized subset design, organizing the tests into theoretically and empirically informed categories and apportioning power accordingly. Three subsets were used: (a) a priori loci implicated by previous studies; (b) high-value addiction (HVA) markers from the recently developed SmokeScreen array; and (c) an atheoretical genome-wide scan. Among a priori loci, a nominally significant association was present between DRD and rs521674 in ADRA2A. No significant HVA loci were detected. One statistically significant genome-wide association was detected (rs13395777, p = 2.8 × 10-8), albeit in an intergenic region of unknown function. These findings are generally not supportive of the previous candidate gene studies and suggest that DRD has a complex genetic architecture that will require considerably larger samples to identify genetic associations more definitively. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265060      PMCID: PMC6908809          DOI: 10.1037/pha0000227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  89 in total

1.  Commentary: Delay discounting and smoking: robust correlation, but uncertain causation.

Authors:  James MacKillop; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Intake-dependent effects of cocaine self-administration on impulsive choice in a delay discounting task.

Authors:  Marci R Mitchell; Virginia G Weiss; Dominique J Ouimet; Rita A Fuchs; Drake Morgan; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Clarifying the relationship between impulsive delay discounting and nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Michael Amlung; James MacKillop
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-05-19

4.  The latent structure of impulsivity: impulsive choice, impulsive action, and impulsive personality traits.

Authors:  James MacKillop; Jessica Weafer; Joshua C Gray; Assaf Oshri; Abraham Palmer; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Chronic atomoxetine treatment during adolescence decreases impulsive choice, but not impulsive action, in adult rats and alters markers of synaptic plasticity in the orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Haosheng Sun; Paul J Cocker; Fiona D Zeeb; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The genetics of impulsivity: evidence for the heritability of delay discounting.

Authors:  Andrey P Anokhin; Julia D Grant; Richard C Mulligan; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls.

Authors:  K N Kirby; N M Petry; W K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-03

8.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II.

Authors:  J B Saunders; O G Aasland; T F Babor; J R de la Fuente; M Grant
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Strong genetic influences on measures of behavioral-regulation among inbred rat strains.

Authors:  J B Richards; D R Lloyd; B Kuehlewind; L Militello; M Paredez; L Solberg Woods; A A Palmer
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  Rats bred for high alcohol drinking are more sensitive to delayed and probabilistic outcomes.

Authors:  C J Wilhelm; S H Mitchell
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.449

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genomic basis of delayed reward discounting.

Authors:  Joshua C Gray; Sandra Sanchez-Roige; Harriet de Wit; James MacKillop; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice.

Authors:  Kristof Keidel; Qëndresa Rramani; Bernd Weber; Carsten Murawski; Ulrich Ettinger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-16

3.  Genetic underpinnings of affective temperaments: a pilot GWAS investigation identifies a new genome-wide significant SNP for anxious temperament in ADGRB3 gene.

Authors:  Xenia Gonda; Nora Eszlari; Dora Torok; Zsofia Gal; Janos Bokor; Andras Millinghoffer; Daniel Baksa; Peter Petschner; Peter Antal; Gerome Breen; Gabriella Juhasz; Gyorgy Bagdy
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan J Becker; Jeremy M Haynes; Ann Galizio; Charles C J Frye; Haylee Downey; Jonathan E Friedel; D M Perez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.215

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.