Literature DB >> 30265011

Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review.

Jason C K Chan1, Christian A Meissner1, Sara D Davis1.   

Abstract

A growing body of research has shown that retrieval can enhance future learning of new materials. In the present report, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on this finding, which we term test-potentiated new learning. Our primary objectives were to (a) produce an integrative review of the existing theoretical explanations, (b) summarize the extant empirical data with a meta-analysis, (c) evaluate the existing accounts with the meta-analytic results, and (d) highlight areas that deserve further investigations. Here, we identified four nonexclusive classes of theoretical accounts, including resource accounts, metacognitive accounts, context accounts, and integration accounts. Our quantitative review of the literature showed that testing reliably potentiates the future learning of new materials by increasing correct recall or by reducing erroneous intrusions, and several factors have a powerful impact on whether testing potentiates or impairs new learning. Results of a metaregression analysis provide considerable support for the integration account. Lastly, we discuss areas of under-investigation and possible directions for future research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265011     DOI: 10.1037/bul0000166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  10 in total

1.  Testing enhances motor practice.

Authors:  Tobias Tempel; Christian Frings
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

2.  The role of emotion arousal in the retrieval practice effect.

Authors:  Xi Jia; Chuanji Gao; Lixia Cui; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Soliciting judgments of forgetting reactively enhances memory as well as making judgments of learning: Empirical and meta-analytic tests.

Authors:  Baike Li; Wenbo Zhao; Jun Zheng; Xiao Hu; Ningxin Su; Tian Fan; Yue Yin; Meng Liu; Chunliang Yang; Liang Luo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-12-02

4.  The Effects of Interspersed Retrieval Practice in Multiple-List Learning on Initially Studied Material.

Authors:  Oliver Kliegl; Verena M Kriechbaum; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  A mind-wandering account of the testing effect: Does context variation matter?

Authors:  Sarah Shi Hui Wong; Stephen Wee Hun Lim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-08-13

6.  Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.

Authors:  Jessica A LaPaglia; Jason C K Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Interpolated testing and content pretesting as interventions to reduce task-unrelated thoughts during a video lecture.

Authors:  Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips; Bridget A Smeekens; Akira Miyake; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-03-26

8.  Retrieval Practice Enhances New Learning but does Not Affect Performance in Subsequent Arithmetic Tasks.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Julian Urban; Johannes Lötzer; Christian Frings
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-03-22

9.  Does expressive writing or an instructional intervention reduce the impacts of test anxiety in a college classroom?

Authors:  Sarah J Myers; Sara D Davis; Jason C K Chan
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Does testing enhance new learning because it insulates against proactive interference?

Authors:  Dahwi Ahn; Jason C K Chan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.