N S Kane1,2, C J Hoogendoorn1, M L Tanenbaum3, J S Gonzalez1,4,5. 1. Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA. 2. War Related Injury & Illness Study Center, VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 5. New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Diabetes-related distress is common among adults with Type 2 diabetes and is consistently associated with poorer self-management and treatment outcomes. However, little is known about the psychological factors that may contribute to or protect against diabetes distress. This study examined illness burden, and positive and negative ways of thinking and relating to oneself in times of stress, as independent correlates of diabetes distress, cross sectionally and longitudinally. METHOD: A total of 120 adults treated for Type 2 diabetes reported their physical symptom complaints, cognitive emotion regulation, self-compassion and diabetes distress at baseline; 110 completed a 3-month follow-up assessment of diabetes distress. Pearson correlations and multivariable linear regression tested baseline and longitudinal relationships. RESULTS: Baseline diabetes distress was associated with greater use of negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies (r = 0.43, P < 0.01), greater tendency towards self-criticism, self-judgement and over-identification (r = 0.37, P < 0.01), and greater physical symptom burden (r = 0.50, P < 0.01). Baseline physical symptoms and negative cognitive emotion regulation were independently associated with baseline diabetes distress. Baseline physical symptoms and negative aspects of self-compassion significantly predicted diabetes distress over 3 months. Positive aspects of cognitive emotion regulation and self-compassion were not independently associated with diabetes distress cross sectionally or longitudinally. CONCLUSION: Greater symptom burden along with the use of negative cognitive emotion regulation and negative aspects of self-compassion were independently associated with diabetes distress. If these relations are explained by causal influence, these modifiable factors could be fruitful targets for intervention research.
AIMS: Diabetes-related distress is common among adults with Type 2 diabetes and is consistently associated with poorer self-management and treatment outcomes. However, little is known about the psychological factors that may contribute to or protect against diabetes distress. This study examined illness burden, and positive and negative ways of thinking and relating to oneself in times of stress, as independent correlates of diabetes distress, cross sectionally and longitudinally. METHOD: A total of 120 adults treated for Type 2 diabetes reported their physical symptom complaints, cognitive emotion regulation, self-compassion and diabetes distress at baseline; 110 completed a 3-month follow-up assessment of diabetes distress. Pearson correlations and multivariable linear regression tested baseline and longitudinal relationships. RESULTS: Baseline diabetes distress was associated with greater use of negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies (r = 0.43, P < 0.01), greater tendency towards self-criticism, self-judgement and over-identification (r = 0.37, P < 0.01), and greater physical symptom burden (r = 0.50, P < 0.01). Baseline physical symptoms and negative cognitive emotion regulation were independently associated with baseline diabetes distress. Baseline physical symptoms and negative aspects of self-compassion significantly predicted diabetes distress over 3 months. Positive aspects of cognitive emotion regulation and self-compassion were not independently associated with diabetes distress cross sectionally or longitudinally. CONCLUSION: Greater symptom burden along with the use of negative cognitive emotion regulation and negative aspects of self-compassion were independently associated with diabetes distress. If these relations are explained by causal influence, these modifiable factors could be fruitful targets for intervention research.
Authors: Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Naomi S Kane; Deborah H Binko; Amit Shapira; Claire J Hoogendoorn Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Lawrence Fisher; Danielle Hessler; William H Polonsky; Umesh Masharani; Susan Guzman; Vicky Bowyer; Lisa Strycker; Andrew Ahmann; Marina Basina; Ian Blumer; Charles Chloe; Sarah Kim; Anne L Peters; Martha Shumway; Karen Weihs; Patricia Wu Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jeff C Huffman; Christina M DuBois; Rachel A Millstein; Christopher M Celano; Deborah Wexler Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: Julie Wagner; Stephen Armeli; Howard Tennen; Angela Bermudez-Millan; Howard Wolpert; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2020-06-03
Authors: Sarah Gunn; Joseph Henson; Noelle Robertson; John Maltby; Emer M Brady; Sarah Henderson; Michelle Hadjiconstantinou; Andrew P Hall; Alex V Rowlands; Thomas Yates; Melanie J Davies Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2022-09