Literature DB >> 30264873

Solidarity and care as relational practices.

Bruce Jennings1.   

Abstract

Many working in bioethics today are engaging in forms of normative interpretation concerning the meaningful contexts of relational agency and institutional structures of power. Using the framework of relational bioethics, this article focuses on two significant social practices that are significant for health policy and public health: the practices of solidarity and the practices of care. The main argument is that the affirming recognition of, and caring attention paid to, persons as moral subjects can politically motivate a society in three respects. The recognition of solidarity and the attention of care can prompt progressive change toward a democratic willingness: (a) to provide for equal respect for rights and dignity; (b) to provide the social resources and services needed for just health and well-being; and (c) to focus its creativity and wealth on the actualization of potential flourishing of each and all. Solidarity is discussed as a morally developmental stance that moves from standing up for another, standing up with another, and standing up as another. Care is discussed as a morally developmental stance that moves from the attentive rehabilitation of another, attentive companionship with and for another, and attentive commitment to another.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioethics; care; community; flourishing; justice; recognition; social practices; solidarity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30264873     DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  9 in total

1.  Relational Ethics for Public Health: Interpreting Solidarity and Care.

Authors:  Bruce Jennings
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2019-03

2.  Using community engagement to implement evidence-based practices for opioid use disorder: A data-driven paradigm & systems science approach.

Authors:  Nabila El-Bassel; Louisa Gilbert; Tim Hunt; Elwin Wu; Emmanuel A Oga; Trena I Mukherjee; Aimee N C Campbell; Nasim Sabounchi; Damara Gutnick; Robin Kerner; Kamilla L Venner; David Lounsbury; Terry T K Huang; Bruce Rapkin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Authoritative Parents and Dominant Children as the Center of Communication for Sustainable Healthy Aging.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wianto; Elty Sarvia; Chien-Hsu Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Lay persons' perception of the requirements for research in emergency obstetric and newborn care.

Authors:  Dan Kabonge Kaye
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Social Innovation Toward a Meaningful Everyday Life for Nursing Home Residents: An Ethnographic Study.

Authors:  Åshild Slettebø; Ragnhild Skaar; Kari Brodtkorb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-25

6.  Solidaristic behavior and its limits: A qualitative study about German and Swiss residents' behaviors towards public health measures during COVID-19 lockdown in April 2020.

Authors:  Nora Hangel; Franziska Schönweitz; Stuart McLennan; Amelia Fiske; Bettina M Zimmermann; Alena Buyx
Journal:  SSM Qual Res Health       Date:  2022-02-04

7.  Fostering and sustaining transnational solidarities for transformative social change: Advancing community psychology research and action.

Authors:  Christopher C Sonn; Rachael Fox; Samuel Keast; Mohi Rua
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2022-06

8.  Epistemic solidarity in medicine and healthcare.

Authors:  Mirjam Pot
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2022-08-31

9.  Solidarity and Community Engagement in Global Health Research.

Authors:  Bridget Pratt; Phaik Yeong Cheah; Vicki Marsh
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 14.676

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.