Paul A Scuffham1, Joshua M Byrnes2, Christine Pollicino3, David Cross4, Stan Goldstein3, Shu-Kay Ng2. 1. Centre for Applied Health Economics, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. p.scuffham@griffith.edu.au. 2. Centre for Applied Health Economics, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. 3. Bupa Australia, Sydney, Australia. 4. Bupa Health Dialog, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disease management programmes may improve quality of care, improve health outcomes and potentially reduce total healthcare costs. To date, only one very large population-based study has been undertaken and indicated reductions in hospital admissions > 10%. OBJECTIVE: We sought to confirm the effectiveness of population-based disease management programmes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative impact on healthcare utilisation and cost of participants the Costs to Australian Private Insurance - Coaching Health (CAPICHe) trial. DESIGN: Parallel-group randomised controlled trial, intention-to-treat analysis SETTING:Australian population PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four thousandfour hundred eighteen individuals (18-90 years of age) with private health insurance and diagnosis of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes, or low back pain, with predicted high cost claims for the following 12 months. INTERVENTION: Health coaching for disease management from Bupa Health Dialog, vs Usual Care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total cost of claims per member to the private health insurer 1 year post-randomisation for hospital admissions, including same-day, medical and prostheses hospital claims, excluding any maternity costs. Analysis was based on the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Estimated total cost 1 year post-randomisation was not significantly different (means: intervention group A$4934; 95% CI A$4823-A$5045 vs control group A$4868; 95% CI A$4680-A$5058; p = 0.524). However, the intervention group had significantly lower same-day admission costs (A$468; 95% CI A$454-A$482 vs A$508; 95% CI A$484-A$533; p = 0.002) and fewer same-day admissions per 1000 person-years (intervention group, 530; 95% CI 508-552 vs control group, 614; 95% CI 571-657; p = 0.002). Subgroup analyses indicated that the intervention group had significantly fewer admissions for patients with COPD and fewer same-day admissions for patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic disease health coaching was not effective to reduce the total cost after 12 months of follow-up for higher risk individuals with a chronic condition. Statistically significant changes were found with fewer same-day admissions; however, these did not translate into cost savings from a private health insurance perspective.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Disease management programmes may improve quality of care, improve health outcomes and potentially reduce total healthcare costs. To date, only one very large population-based study has been undertaken and indicated reductions in hospital admissions > 10%. OBJECTIVE: We sought to confirm the effectiveness of population-based disease management programmes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative impact on healthcare utilisation and cost of participants the Costs to Australian Private Insurance - Coaching Health (CAPICHe) trial. DESIGN: Parallel-group randomised controlled trial, intention-to-treat analysis SETTING: Australian population PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four thousand four hundred eighteen individuals (18-90 years of age) with private health insurance and diagnosis of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes, or low back pain, with predicted high cost claims for the following 12 months. INTERVENTION: Health coaching for disease management from Bupa Health Dialog, vs Usual Care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total cost of claims per member to the private health insurer 1 year post-randomisation for hospital admissions, including same-day, medical and prostheses hospital claims, excluding any maternity costs. Analysis was based on the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Estimated total cost 1 year post-randomisation was not significantly different (means: intervention group A$4934; 95% CI A$4823-A$5045 vs control group A$4868; 95% CI A$4680-A$5058; p = 0.524). However, the intervention group had significantly lower same-day admission costs (A$468; 95% CI A$454-A$482 vs A$508; 95% CI A$484-A$533; p = 0.002) and fewer same-day admissions per 1000 person-years (intervention group, 530; 95% CI 508-552 vs control group, 614; 95% CI 571-657; p = 0.002). Subgroup analyses indicated that the intervention group had significantly fewer admissions for patients with COPD and fewer same-day admissions for patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS:Chronic disease health coaching was not effective to reduce the total cost after 12 months of follow-up for higher risk individuals with a chronic condition. Statistically significant changes were found with fewer same-day admissions; however, these did not translate into cost savings from a private health insurance perspective.
Authors: R Q Wolever; M Dreusicke; J Fikkan; T V Hawkins; S Yeung; J Wakefield; L Duda; P Flowers; C Cook; E Skinner Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Laurie Ruggiero; Barth B Riley; Rosalba Hernandez; Lauretta T Quinn; Ben S Gerber; Amparo Castillo; Joseph Day; Diana Ingram; Yamin Wang; Paula Butler Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Irene D Blackberry; John S Furler; James D Best; Patty Chondros; Margarite Vale; Christine Walker; Trisha Dunning; Leonie Segal; James Dunbar; Ralph Audehm; Danny Liew; Doris Young Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-09-18
Authors: Charlotte C Poot; Eline Meijer; Annemarije L Kruis; Nynke Smidt; Niels H Chavannes; Persijn J Honkoop Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-08
Authors: Jade Schrijver; Anke Lenferink; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Marlies Zwerink; Paul Dlpm van der Valk; Job van der Palen; Tanja W Effing Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-01-10