Benton A Emblom1, Taylor Mathis2, Kyle Aune3. 1. Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 2. Specialty Orthopedic Group, Tupelo, Mississippi, USA. 3. American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A rectus abdominis-adductor longus (RA-AL) aponeurotic plate injury, commonly associated with athletic pubalgia, sports hernia, or a core muscle injury, causes significant dysfunction in athletes. Increased recognition of this specific injury distinct from inguinal hernia abnormalities has led to better management of this debilitating condition. HYPOTHESIS: Surgical repair of RA-AL aponeurotic plate injuries will result in decreased symptoms and high rates of return to play. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Using our billing and clinical database, patients who underwent RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair by a single surgeon at a single institution were contacted for Hip Outcome Score (HOS) and return-to-play data. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis by history, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging who failed 6 to 12 weeks of appropriate conservative treatment were indicated for surgery. Surgical repair involved adductor longus fractional lengthening, limited adductor longus tenotomy, and a turn-up flap of the released adductor tendon and aponeurosis onto the rectus abdominis for imbrication reinforcement. RESULTS: Of 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 85 (85%) were contacted. A total of 82 (96%) patients were able to return to play at a mean of 4.1 months after repair. Hip function was rated as 98% of normal and sports function as 92% of normal. Factors associated with negative outcomes were multiple procedures, prior inguinal hernia repair, and female sex. Negative outcomes were demonstrated by decreased HOS scores and decreased sports function. The overall complication rate was 7%. CONCLUSION: RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair by the method of an adductor-to-rectus abdominis turn-up flap is a safe procedure with high return-to-play success. Patients who had previously undergone inguinal hernia repair or other hip/pelvic-related surgery and female patients had worse outcomes.
BACKGROUND: A rectus abdominis-adductor longus (RA-AL) aponeurotic plate injury, commonly associated with athletic pubalgia, sports hernia, or a core muscle injury, causes significant dysfunction in athletes. Increased recognition of this specific injury distinct from inguinal hernia abnormalities has led to better management of this debilitating condition. HYPOTHESIS: Surgical repair of RA-AL aponeurotic plate injuries will result in decreased symptoms and high rates of return to play. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Using our billing and clinical database, patients who underwent RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair by a single surgeon at a single institution were contacted for Hip Outcome Score (HOS) and return-to-play data. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis by history, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging who failed 6 to 12 weeks of appropriate conservative treatment were indicated for surgery. Surgical repair involved adductor longus fractional lengthening, limited adductor longus tenotomy, and a turn-up flap of the released adductor tendon and aponeurosis onto the rectus abdominis for imbrication reinforcement. RESULTS: Of 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 85 (85%) were contacted. A total of 82 (96%) patients were able to return to play at a mean of 4.1 months after repair. Hip function was rated as 98% of normal and sports function as 92% of normal. Factors associated with negative outcomes were multiple procedures, prior inguinal hernia repair, and female sex. Negative outcomes were demonstrated by decreased HOS scores and decreased sports function. The overall complication rate was 7%. CONCLUSION: RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair by the method of an adductor-to-rectus abdominis turn-up flap is a safe procedure with high return-to-play success. Patients who had previously undergone inguinal hernia repair or other hip/pelvic-related surgery and female patients had worse outcomes.
Athletic pubalgia can be a very debilitating injury in athletes, particularly in
explosive and rotationally demanding sports. This entity commonly includes “sports
hernia” or core muscle injuries, pubic arthropathy/osteitis pubis, entrapment
neuropathies, and rectus abdominis–adductor longus (RA-AL) aponeurotic plate injuries.
Many careers have been affected because of hip or groin injuries.[10] Athletic competition that involves hyperextension of the hip and trunk with
twisting motions such as kicking or a hockey slap shot generates tremendous forces
across the common tendon attachment of the rectus abdominis and adductor longus tendons.[6,22] Repetitive trauma or single episodes can result in strain or avulsion at this
attachment, leading to significant dysfunction in twisting, cutting, or pivoting sports.
Historically, this was felt to be symptomatic inguinal canal insufficiency without true
herniation, and treatment was based on standard hernia repair techniques.[4,7,8,11,23] In addition to other sources of groin pain, this specific injury to the
aponeurotic plate is becoming more recognized as a distinct tendinous injury, thus
requiring more specific structural repair.In several previously published reports using varying techniques, return to play was
good, with rates ranging from 80% to 97%, but some athletes experienced failure of treatment.[13,17,21,26] As more attention was drawn to this condition, advanced imaging and specialized
evaluations uncovered the injury to the common aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis and
adductor longus as a cause of athletic pubalgia (Figure 1). Several authors began to recognize the
involvement of the adductor tendon and began performing adductor tenotomy along with
standard herniorrhaphy.[1,2,7,17,18,26] Both laparoscopic and open techniques have been used, and techniques include
plication of the inguinal canal structures, suturing of the conjoint tendon to the
inguinal ligament, and even the use of mesh for inguinal canal or pelvic floor
reconstruction. A “minimal repair” technique with primary neurolysis and/or neurectomy
of the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve has also been described.[20] There remains a lack of consensus on the definitive lesion and appropriate
treatment.
Figure 1.
The relationship of the common aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis and adductor
longus demonstrated in the coronal and sagittal planes. Image courtesy of OBERD.
Reproduced with permission.
The relationship of the common aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis and adductor
longus demonstrated in the coronal and sagittal planes. Image courtesy of OBERD.
Reproduced with permission.In 2012, the senior author (B.A.E.) began performing a technique for RA-AL aponeurotic
plate injuries with an adductor-to–rectus abdominis turn-up flap. The purpose of this
article is to present our current surgical technique and outcomes with this repair in
the first consecutive 100 patients.
Methods
This study was approved by the institutional review board of St Vincent’s Health
System. Patients were identified in our clinical and billing records based on
Current Procedural Terminology codes 27299 and 27299SH. Operative notes were
reviewed, and patients were selected if they underwent our standard repair of the
RA-AL aponeurotic plate. A minimum 6-month follow-up was required, and there were no
exclusions. Patient sex, age, and unilateral versus bilateral involvement were all
recorded. Patients were then contacted for a telephone interview and inclusion in
the study. Verbal consent for inclusion was obtained before conducting the telephone
interview. The Hip Outcome Score (HOS) was used as a standardized metric. The HOS
was selected as the most commonly used outcome measure with athletic-related hip
injuries, and it includes a sport subscale (HOS-Sport). Subjective scores assessing
overall hip function (normal, nearly normal, abnormal) and sports function (≥90% or
<90%) were also obtained. Additional information gathered included prior surgery,
additional surgeries, previous invasive treatment, time to return to full
competition, sexual or urinary dysfunction, and highest postoperative level of
competition.Subgroup analysis was completed to evaluate the small subset of patients who were
either unable to return to competition or felt a significant loss of function after
surgery. A complication was defined as the need for a second surgical procedure at
the same location, a localized infection, or an anesthetic-related complication.
Patient Evaluation
Our history and examination followed an organized progression. History was taken
in detail and often pointed quickly toward the correct diagnosis. The majority
of patients experienced an acute “sentinel” groin injury that progressed
subacutely to pain in the lower abdomen; however, many experienced an insidious
onset. An inability to perform explosive movements, perform lateral or
rotational changes in direction, or sustain peak performance was most commonly
reported. Injury date, sport, level of play, prior surgery, and a comprehensive
review of systems were recorded. The physical examination began with a general
assessment of the patient's overall condition. A complete evaluation of hip
range of motion along with impingement testing were performed because of the
high incidence of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) associated with athletic pubalgia.[5] Pain or loss of motion with flexion, adduction, and internal rotation or
flexion, abduction, and internal rotation indicated FAI as a potential
concomitant diagnosis.The examination of the pubic symphysis and groin began with visualization.
Bruising or swelling could indicate an acute injury, and prior incisions might
be recognized, which were critical in this patient population because of the
incidence of prior surgeries. Palpation was critical to assessing the location
of the abnormality. Tenderness directly over the midline indicated potential
osteitis pubis. Other entities such as symphyseal arthritis or infection would
also be tender to palpation at the midline. Lateral compression of the pelvis
could also cause pain at the midline. Tenderness immediately lateral to the
symphysis, where the common aponeurosis of the adductor longus and rectus
abdominis attaches to the pubis, indicated a common site for pain with an RA-AL
aponeurotic plate injury. Specific to the RA-AL aponeurotic plate evaluation was
pain at the same location with resisted sit-ups and simultaneous resisted
adduction. These reliably produced pain directly over the pubic tubercle or
slightly distal over the adductor tendon.Imaging results were also critically evaluated. A standard anteroposterior
radiograph was obtained in patients with groin pain toward the midline. If
patients had 1 or both hips involved in their reported symptoms, anteroposterior
and frog-leg lateral radiographs were obtained. Plain radiography assists in the
evaluation of bony abnormalities such as heterotopic ossification, osteophytes,
or FAI. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is our preferred technique for an RA-AL
aponeurotic plate evaluation. Plain pelvic MRI is used unless concomitant
intra-articular hip abnormalities are suspected, in which case a magnetic
resonance arthrogram is obtained. Other intra-abdominal abnormalities can be
identified, and the rectus and adductor tendons are best visualized on MRI.
Tendon avulsions or tendinitis could be seen, as increased signal and frank
detachment might be visible. Our most common finding, shown in Figures 2 and 3, was a partial tendon
avulsion from the inferior edge of the superior pubic ramus. This has been
termed a “superior cleft sign.”[19]
Figure 2.
Coronal STIR (short tau inversion recovery) magnetic resonance imaging of
the pelvis in a 21-year-old male patient with left-sided groin pain.
There is a defect in the common aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis and
adductor longus tendon, as indicated by the larger yellow arrow. Also, a
subtle area of edema along the inferior edge of the superior pubic ramus
is seen along the muscular attachment (smaller green arrow).
Figure 3.
Coronal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in a
19-year-old male patient with left-sided groin pain demonstrates a more
significant defect in the common aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis and
adductor longus tendon (arrow).
Coronal STIR (short tau inversion recovery) magnetic resonance imaging of
the pelvis in a 21-year-old male patient with left-sided groin pain.
There is a defect in the common aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis and
adductor longus tendon, as indicated by the larger yellow arrow. Also, a
subtle area of edema along the inferior edge of the superior pubic ramus
is seen along the muscular attachment (smaller green arrow).Coronal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in a
19-year-old male patient with left-sided groin pain demonstrates a more
significant defect in the common aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis and
adductor longus tendon (arrow).
Surgical Indications
Surgery was considered only after conservative treatment had failed. All patients
underwent an attempt with a combination of active rest, nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs if able, physical therapy, and at times local
corticosteroid injections. Six to 12 weeks was our standard duration of
conservative treatment. If symptoms were tolerable, in-season athletes were
allowed to return to sport if able. When symptoms still persisted, surgery was
indicated.
Surgical Technique
Patients were placed supine on the operating table, and their hair was clipped
before the area was prepped and draped in a typical fashion. Bony landmarks were
palpated and marked. The patient’s legs were placed in the frog-leg position. A
4-cm horizontal incision was made on the injured side along the superior pubic
ramus in the upper one-third of the bone. This was then carried down with
scissor dissection spreading in the cephalad-to-caudad direction to protect
superficial neural structures. In male patients, the spermatic cord was palpated
and retracted medially for protection. The common aponeurosis of the adductor
longus and rectus abdominis was identified (Figure 4). Needle-tip electrocautery was
used to perform fractional lengthening and incomplete adductor longus tenotomy
anteriorly (from medial to lateral) approximately 1 cm off the pubic origin,
leaving a 1-cm flap of the adductor tendon at the pelvic attachment (Figure 5). This tendon
flap was then folded back and turned up onto the rectus aponeurosis, and 3
nonabsorbable figure-of-8 sutures were used to join the rectus, underlying
periosteum, and adductor flap (Figure 6). Early in the series, a deep drain was placed and removed
at the physical therapy recheck on the first postoperative day. During the
series, the change was made to placing thrombin-soaked Gelfoam (Pfizer) in the
fractionated adductor site in lieu of a deep drain (Figure 7). After irrigation, the wound
was closed with buried 3-0 Monocryl (Ethicon) and running 3-0 Monocryl, and
island dressings were placed.
Figure 4.
The deep investing fascial layer is exposed. A surgical marking pen has
been used to outline the lateral border of the rectus abdominis and
adductor longus at their common attachment points of the pubis.
Figure 5.
Needle-tip electrocautery is utilized to perform limited adductor longus
tenotomy and generate a soft tissue sleeve to turn up, repair, and
reinforce the rectus abdominis to the pubis.
Figure 6.
Nonabsorbable suture is used for repair.
Figure 7.
Gelfoam is used for hemostasis and a void filler to facilitate
reconstitution of the fractionated adductor longus tendon.
The deep investing fascial layer is exposed. A surgical marking pen has
been used to outline the lateral border of the rectus abdominis and
adductor longus at their common attachment points of the pubis.Needle-tip electrocautery is utilized to perform limited adductor longus
tenotomy and generate a soft tissue sleeve to turn up, repair, and
reinforce the rectus abdominis to the pubis.Nonabsorbable suture is used for repair.Gelfoam is used for hemostasis and a void filler to facilitate
reconstitution of the fractionated adductor longus tendon.Physical therapy began on postoperative day 1. Phase 1, consisting of weeks 1 and
2, was focused on decreasing pain and inflammation by stretching, walking, and
cryotherapy. Recruitment of the transversus abdominis with controlled isometrics
was initiated. Week 2 comprised more active hip and core exercises including hip
strengthening, mini-squats, lunges, pelvic tilts, and continued stretching.
Phase 2, consisting of weeks 3 and 4, began when the patient had minimal pain,
improved hip and spine range of motion, an ability to achieve a neutral spine,
and recruitment of the transversus abdominis. Core activity was significantly
increased in weeks 3 and 4. The single-leg stance and perturbations improved hip
and core strength. More aggressive stretching was permitted, and jogging was
initiated. Phase 3, the advanced exercise phase, was centered around returning
to light sport activity and the ability to initiate the single-leg stance with
good stabilization of the spine and pelvis. Core and hip strengthening was
increased, plyometric training was initiated, and light sport activity was
started but without cutting or lateral movements. Cutting, agility, pivoting,
and speed training began around week 6. Return to play was allowed once certain
criteria were met: full range of motion without pain, equal hip strength,
sport-specific drills without pain, and satisfactory physical examination
findings by the physician.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive and inferential calculations were made using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute).
Subgroups were defined, and comparisons were made using the Student
t test and chi-square test. Statistically significant
differences in HOS scores were considered clinically nonsignificant if they did
not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 9 points for
the HOS–Activities of Daily Living or 6 points for the HOS-Sport.[16] Mixed stepwise logistic and generalized linear regression was used to
determine the best predictors for positive outcomes as measured by return to
sport, return to sport in less than 6 months, sports function >90%, normal
hip function, and absence of complications or sexual/genitourinary dysfunction.
Predictors included patient sex, concomitant procedures, previous inguinal
hernia repair, laterality (unilateral vs bilateral), number of procedures
performed, and age at surgery. Variables with a P value <.25
were entered into the model, and variables with a P value
>.15 were removed. Second-level interactions were considered for all
predictors. Differences with P < .05 were considered
significant.
Results
In total, 100 patients were identified, and 85 patients were interviewed, resulting
in an 85% follow-up rate. The mean follow-up time was 25.8 ± 13.2 months (range,
6.9-53.8 months). There were no significant baseline demographic or intraoperative
differences between those who were successfully followed up via telephone and those
who were not able to be contacted. The mean age at surgery was 26.0 ± 10.9 years
(range, 15-65 years). Male patients were the majority (86%), and the most commonly
reported sport played was football (34%). Most patients competed at the collegiate
level at the time of surgery (49%), although 29% were recreational athletes. The
vast majority of repairs were performed unilaterally (92%). Thirty-one patients
(38%) had undergone some prior medical treatment for abdominal/groin pain, of whom 9
had a prior inguinal hernia that was surgically repaired. Full baseline demographics
and intraoperative information can be found in Table 1. Six patients experienced a
surgical complication, for an overall complication rate of 7%. Complications
included 2 unconfirmed retears, 2 superficial wound infections, 1 hematoma, and 1
reoperation for heterotopic ossification. Eight patients experienced transient
sexual dysfunction, and no patients experienced urinary dysfunction. The majority of
patients (87%) rated their hip function after surgery as normal.
TABLE 1
Patient Demographics
Female (n = 12)
Male (n = 73)
Total (N = 85)
P Value
Age, mean ± SD, y
28.8 ± 9.7
25.5 ± 11.1
26.0 ± 10.9
.35
Sport played
.073
Baseball
0 (0)
9 (13)
9 (11)
Basketball
0 (0)
3 (4)
3 (4)
Football
0 (0)
29 (41)
29 (34)
Running/track & field
3 (25)
10 (14)
13 (16)
Soccer
2 (17)
6 (8)
8 (10)
Softball
1 (8)
3 (4)
4 (5)
Tennis
2 (17)
4 (6)
6 (7)
Weight lifting/exercise
3 (25)
5 (7)
8 (10)
Other
1 (8)
4 (6)
5 (6)
Level of play
.28
Recreational
6 (50)
19 (27)
25 (29)
High school
2 (17)
10 (14)
12 (14)
Collegiate
3 (25)
39 (55)
42 (49)
Professional/Olympic
1 (8)
5 (7)
6 (7)
Bilateral repair
1 (7)
6 (8)
7 (8)
.99
Previous inguinal hernia repair
2 (14)
7 (10)
9 (11)
.61
Data are expressed as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.
Patient DemographicsData are expressed as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.Overall, 82 athletes (96%) were able to return to sport, with a mean recovery time of
4.1 ± 2.3 months (range, 1-12 months) (Table 2). Of those who returned, the
majority did so in less than 6 months (87%). The mean HOS score for all patients was
99.1 ± 3.7 (range, 76-100), and the mean HOS-Sport subscore was 96.4 ± 9.7 (range,
42-100). In addition to the HOS, patients subjectively rated their hip function as
98% of normal and their sports function as 92% of normal, and 78% of athletes
reported sports function of at least 90% of normal (Table 3).
TABLE 2
Return-to-Play Outcomes
Returned to Play
Time to Return to Play, mo
HOS Score
HOS-Sport Subscore
n (%)
P Value
Mean ± SD
P Value
Mean ± SD
P Value
Mean ± SD
P Value
Overall
82/85 (96)
4.1 ± 2.3
99.1 ± 3.7
96.4 ± 9.7
Sex
.37
.26
.015
.028
Female
11/12 (92)
4.9 ± 3.3
99.5 ± 2.9
90.8 ± 17.2
Male
71/73 (97)
4.0 ± 2.1
96.7 ± 6.7
97.3 ± 7.6
Age
>.99
.82
.87
.99
≤25 y
57/59 (97)
4.2 ± 2.2
99.1 ± 3.6
96.4 ± 9.8
>25 y
25/26 (96)
4.1 ± 2.5
99.0 ± 4.2
96.4 ± 9.7
Prior procedures
.008
.039
<.001
<.001
Yes
15/18 (83)
5.2 ± 2.9
95.9 ± 7.4
89.3 ± 18.6
No
67/67 (100)
3.9 ± 2.1
99.9 ± 0.4
98.3 ± 3.7
Repair laterality
>.99
.34
.56
.84
Unilateral
75/78 (96)
4.2 ± 2.3
100.0 ± 3.9
96.4 ± 10.1
Bilateral
7/7 (100)
3.4 ± 1.9
99.9 ± 0.4
97.1 ± 3.2
Previous inguinal hernia
.29
.027
.067
.030
Yes
8/9 (89)
5.8 ± 3.6
95.9 ± 8.1
89.8 ± 18.6
No
73/75 (97)
3.9 ± 2.0
99.4 ± 2.7
97.2 ± 8.0
HOS, Hip Outcome Score.
TABLE 3
Functional Outcomes
Hip Function
Sports Functionb
Normal
Nearly Normal
Abnormal
P Value
≥90%
<90%
P Value
Overall
74/85 (87)
7/85 (8)
4/85 (5)
65/83 (78)
18/83 (22)
Sex
.047
.28
Female
8/12 (67)
2/12 (17)
2/12 (17)
8/12 (67)
4/12 (33)
Male
66/73 (90)
5/73 (7)
2/73 (3)
57/71 (80)
14/71 (20)
Age
.96
>.99
≤25 y
51/59 (86)
5/59 (8)
3/59 (5)
46/59 (78)
13/59 (22)
>25 y
23/26 (88)
2/26 (8)
1/26 (4)
19/24 (79)
5/24 (21)
Prior procedures
.007
<.001
Yes
12/18 (67)
3/18 (17)
3/18 (17)
59/66 (89)
7/66 (11)
No
62/67 (93)
4/67 (6)
1/67 (1)
6/17 (35)
11/17 (65)
Repair laterality
.57
.11
Unilateral
67/78 (86)
7/78 (9)
4/78 (5)
62/77 (81)
15/77 (19)
Bilateral
7/7 (100)
0/7 (0)
0/7 (0)
3/6 (50)
3/6 (50)
Previous inguinal hernia
.16
.011
Yes
6/9 (67)
2/9 (22)
1/9 (11)
3/8 (38)
5/8 (63)
No
67/75 (89)
5/75 (7)
3/75 (4)
61/74 (82)
13/74 (18)
Data are expressed as n (%).
Two male patients did not provide their estimated sports
function.
Return-to-Play OutcomesHOS, Hip Outcome Score.Functional OutcomesData are expressed as n (%).Two male patients did not provide their estimated sports
function.Male patients reported statistically significantly higher HOS scores
(P = .015) compared with female patients, although this
difference did not exceed the MCID for the HOS. However, male patients also had
significantly higher HOS-Sport subscores (P = .028) that were
greater than the MCID for the HOS-Sport. Male patients also reported their hip
function as 8.7 percentage points higher than female patients (P
< .001) and their sports function as 12.1 percentage points higher than female
patients (P = .009) and were more likely to report normal hip
function (P = .047). Patients who had undergone prior procedures
were less likely to return to play (P < .001), were less likely
to report their hip function as normal (P = .007), were less likely
to report their sports function as ≥90% (P < .001), scored 9.0
points lower on the HOS-Sport (P < .001), and were more likely
to experience sexual dysfunction (P = .038) when compared with
patients having undergone isolated sports hernia repair. Of those who returned to
sport, athletes who had undergone prior procedures required 1.3 additional months to
be able to return (P = .039). Athletes who had undergone previous
inguinal hernia repair were less likely to report their sports function as ≥90%
(P = .011), required 1.8 additional months to return to play
(P = .027), and scored 7.4 points lower on the HOS-Sport
(P = .030). Patients undergoing bilateral repair did not fare
differently compared with patients undergoing unilateral RA-AL aponeurotic plate
repair, nor did age have any significant effect.Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed predictive models that identified a
number of significant markers of surgical success. Patients undergoing isolated
RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair were 6.2 times (95% CI, 1.6-23.6) more likely to
report normal hip function (P = .008) and 15.5 times (95% CI,
4.4-54.8) more likely to report sports function ≥90% (P < .001)
compared with patients who underwent prior procedures. Each additional procedure
performed resulted in a 3.0-fold likelihood (95% CI, 1.3-7.2) of being unable to
return to sport in less than 6 months (P = .014). A significant
interaction between patient sex and prior procedures was also found with respect to
the HOS-Sport (P = .011): female patients who underwent at least 1
additional procedure scored significantly lower on the HOS-Sport than female
patients who underwent isolated RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair (P
< .001). Male patients experienced no such significant change in the HOS with
respect to prior procedures performed (P = .95).
Discussion
Our rationale for this technique is derived from understanding the pathoanatomy of
the RA-AL aponeurotic plate injury. Structurally, the common aponeurosis of the
rectus and adductor is compromised chronically because of repetitive microtrauma
and/or acutely because of disruption. Performing fractional lengthening of the
adductor longus allows excessive tension to be relieved from the tendon and muscular
compartment. Subsequently, limited tenotomy allows a structural layer to be turned
up to reinforce the terminal insertion of the rectus while imbricating the injured
region of the aponeurotic plate.Our results compare favorably with previously reported findings of the outcomes for
surgical repair of structurally related injuries across multiple subsets in the
setting of “athletic pubalgia” (Table 4). In the current study, 96% of patients were able to return to
sport at a mean 4.1 months (17.8 weeks) after surgical repair, compared with
previous studies, in which 79% to 100% of athletes returned at a mean 2 to 30 weeks
after a wide variety of surgical treatments for varying anatomic entities.[3,12,14,15,17,20,24-27]
TABLE 4
Comparative Techniques
Study
Total (male/female), n
Age Range, y
Repair Technique
RTP Rate, %
Mean Time to RTP, wk
Current study
85 (73 /12)
15-65
Common aponeurosis repair
96
17.8
Previous literature (weighted average)
583 (579/4)
17-50
92
9.9
Meyers et al[17] (2000)
157 (157/0)
NR
Pelvic floor repair
96
NR
Muschaweck and Berger[20] (2010)
129 (128/1)
21-29
Minimal repair
83
2.0
Brannigan et al[3] (2000)
85 (85/0)
18-50
Modified Shouldice repair
96
NR
Polglase et al[24] (1991)
64 (62/2)
NR
Bassini repair with Tanner slide or transversalis fascia
plication
93
NR
Malycha and Lovell[15] (1992)
50 (NR)
NR
Posterior inguinal wall reinforcement
93
NR
Steele et al[25] (2004)
47 (47/0)
19-41
Modified Bassini repair
79
NR
Joesting[12] (2002)
45 (NR)
NR
Modified Lichtenstein repair
90
NR
Van Der Donckt et al[26] (2003)
41 (41/0)
17-34
Bassini repair and adductor longus tenotomy
100
30.0
Kumar et al[14] (2002)
35 (34/1)
23-45
Repair of external oblique and Prolene darn or Lichtenstein mesh
repair of posterior inguinal canal
93
14.0
Ziprin et al[27] (1999)
25 (25/0)
22-37
Repair of external oblique and inguinal canal
100
11.6
NR, not reported; RTP, return to play.
Comparative TechniquesNR, not reported; RTP, return to play.Nonetheless, our results raise several questions, and there does appear to be an
association with poorer outcomes after RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair. Our
indications are based on very specific clinical and imaging findings, yielding a
reliable return to high-level athletics. However, there appear to be factors
associated with a delayed return, a partial return, or an inability to return. A
small subset of patients had significant dysfunction even with normal daily
activities.Prior surgical treatment of an inguinal hernia correlated with decreased return to
play and significantly poorer outcomes. Within this subset of patients, there was
significant overlap with the patient group that underwent multiple operative
procedures. There were patients who had undergone more than 1 inguinal hernia
repair, and none improved their pain or function. The inability to return to
high-level competition raises the question of failed inguinal hernia repair in the
setting of RA-AL aponeurotic plate injuries. However, of the patients with prior
inguinal hernia repair, 1 was a Division I track athlete, 1 was a collegiate soccer
player, and 1 was a collegiate cheerleader. The track athlete rated himself at 95%
of normal and only had some soreness at top speeds. The soccer player returned to
85% of normal sports function and was able to play more than 80 minutes, with only
limited soreness after practices or games. Prior hernia surgery is not necessarily a
marker of poor outcomes, but patients with prior inguinal hernia surgery for the
same complaint need to be carefully evaluated and appropriately counseled. Patients
who have undergone more total procedures to the groin or hip region also need to be
cautioned that a longer return to sport or worse overall functional scores are not
uncommon in this patient group.In contrast, patients who underwent a single surgical procedure did extremely well.
All were able to return to sport, with the lowest sports function rating of 80% of
normal. Overall, the sports function scores averaged 96%. There were no
complications. The mean time to return to play was 3.9 months. None of the patients
reported abnormal function, and only 1 rated his or her hip function as “nearly
normal” instead of “normal.” The HOS scores were also the highest of all groups. As
with most other surgical procedures of this nature, the initial procedure typically
yields the best outcomes, and poorer outcomes tend to follow with subsequent
operative procedures. This appeared to hold true with the current cohort as well,
and the difference was dramatic. Some difference is expected simply because of
postoperative scarring causing pain, but the functional differences and speed of
return to play suggest that the dysfunction caused by higher numbers of prior
surgeries and/or other coexisting abnormalities (FAI, entrapment neuropathies,
osteitis pubis, psychosocial factors, etc) offsets the benefits of RA-AL aponeurotic
plate repair alone. A statistically significant difference was found in functional
percentages, HOS scores, and rates of return to play. This is a strong conclusion,
and while the numbers associated with prior inguinal hernia repair were relatively
low, a thorough evaluation is critical, and careful consideration is paramount.The difference in outcomes between men and women is complex because of confounding
factors. RA-AL aponeurotic plate injuries are less common in women, and women have
more potential sources for the cause of pelvic or groin pain.[17] Nevertheless, this is the largest series to date describing women undergoing
RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair. Half of the women had undergone more than 1 surgical
procedure: 3 with prior hernia repair and 2 with prior hip arthroscopic surgery for
FAI. A statistically significant difference between sexes was found in hip function,
sports function, and the HOS score but not in time to return to play. There was,
however, a statistically significant difference in the number of operative
procedures in women, which may represent at least part of the cause of the worse
outcomes. Despite these differences, 5 of 11 women returned to 100% athletic
function, of whom 1 had undergone 3 prior inguinal hernia repairs and 1 had
undergone hip arthroscopy. Childbearing and other gynecological conditions could
have some effect here, but those data are not available.One published series that examined inguinal canal abnormalities reported 15 athletes
who underwent plication of the transversalis fascia and suturing of the conjoint
tendon to the inguinal ligament.[8] While 13 patients successfully returned to sport, 2 required eventual
adductor release and were subsequently able to return to play.Meyers et al[18] published a series of 8500 patients evaluated for groin pain, which included
over 5000 surgical procedures. They identified multiple different abnormalities,
which were addressed with 26 different procedures. Roughly 70% of these patients
suffered from adductor and rectus injuries and were treated with rectus repair and
adductor tenotomy. Overall, 95% were able to return to full athletic competition
within 3 months.Athletic pubalgia is also seen at high rates in athletes with FAI. Hammoud et al[9] retrospectively evaluated 38 professional athletes who had undergone
arthroscopic treatment of FAI and who also had symptoms of athletic pubalgia; 32%
had previously undergone surgery for athletic pubalgia, and 1 patient underwent both
FAI and athletic pubalgia surgery performed in the same setting. In this subgroup
with FAI and athletic pubalgia, none returned to competition with AP repair alone.
Symptoms related to athletic pubalgia resolved after FAI treatment alone in 39% of
patients. All patients who underwent athletic pubalgia and FAI surgery returned to
professional sport, with 36 of 38 patients returning to previous levels of play. In
the current study, 4 patients had undergone prior hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI,
and 1 underwent subsequent hip arthroscopic surgery. One was unable to return to
athletics, reported a functional score of 40%, and suffered from dyspareunia.
Another suffered from dyspareunia and reported her athletic function as 20%. She is
currently being evaluated for nerve entrapment. The other 3 patients are doing
excellently. We do not have data collected on patients presenting with both athletic
pubalgia and FAI symptoms for comparison with the data from Hammoud et al.[9]The weaknesses of our study include the retrospective nature and lack of control
group. Future prospective studies with preoperative scores and preinjury
sport-specific statistical data could better define improvement after surgery and
any residual functional deficit after repair. Biomechanical testing of adductor
strength could determine the weakness, if any, caused by adductor tenotomy.
Functional scores were subjective, and return-to-play data were based on patient
recall, so these must be cautiously weighed. Preoperative data on duration of
symptoms were also not available. Analysis of specific patient groups was limited
because of the small sizes of these patient subsets. The causality of specifics such
as prior hernia surgery, female sex, and total number of surgical procedures is
difficult because of the significant crossover within these groups. Limited data on
level of play before and after surgery was also a significant limitation of our
study. Furthermore, follow-up imaging would substantiate reconstitution of the RA-AL
aponeurotic plate.
Conclusion
This study showed that our technique for RA-AL aponeurotic plate repair is safe and
effective in patients diagnosed with RA-AL aponeurotic plate injuries. The
complication rate was low, and functional outcome scores were overall excellent.
Patients who had undergone prior surgery, especially female patients, had a longer
return to sport and had significantly lower functional scores. Conversely, patients
who underwent a single surgical procedure did exceptionally better. Patients were
able to return to prior levels of sport at a high rate, and only a small proportion
experienced any functional deficits. Athletic pubalgia with an RA-AL aponeurotic
plate injury can safely and effectively be treated with an adductor-to–rectus
abdominis turn-up flap.
Authors: William C Meyers; Alex McKechnie; Marc J Philippon; Marcia A Horner; Adam C Zoga; Octavia N Devon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Matthew J Kraeutler; Omer Mei-Dan; Iciar M Dávila Castrodad; Toghrul Talishinskiy; Edward Milman; Anthony J Scillia Journal: J Hip Preserv Surg Date: 2021-12-10
Authors: Matthew J Kraeutler; Jennifer Kurowicki; Iciar M Dávila Castrodad; Edward Milman; Toghrul Talishinskiy; Anthony J Scillia Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-04-07
Authors: Lasse Lempainen; Iftach Hetsroni; Jussi A Kosola; Jaakko J Sinikumpu; Stefano Mazzoni; Sakari Orava Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-10-14
Authors: Joshua P Castle; Adam Kessler; Muhammad J Abbas; Susan Wager; Lafi S Khalil; Kelechi R Okoroha; Nima Mehran Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-08-10
Authors: Thomas James Gill; Andrew J Wall; Frank W Gwathmey; James Whalen; Amun Makani; Bertram Zarins; David Berger Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-01-27