Literature DB >> 30263456

Effect of composite biological preservative containing Lactobacillus plantarum on postharvest litchi quality.

Cong Xu1, Wen-Feng Hu2, Shi Luo1, Hua-Jian Luo1, Ke Ma1, Yan-Fang Li1.   

Abstract

Biological preservatives containing live microorganisms are environmentally friendly and non-toxic substances used to preserve the quality of fresh fruits. This study investigated whether a composite biological preservative containing live Lactobacillus plantarum (designated as DN003) could preserve the quality of postharvest litchi fruits at high temperature and in humid environment. Postharvest litchi fruits were briefly soaked in DN003, then dried and stored at 29-33°C with 95-98% relative humidity; prochloraz treatment was included as positive control and non-treatment as negative control. In comparison with negative control group, litchi fruits in both DN003-treated and positive control groups better retained their appearance with lower polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase activities and showed higher concentrations of vitamin C, titratable acids, and total sugar content. These data demonstrated that the new composite biological preservative containing L. plantarum is promising to be used in the preservation of postharvest litchi fruit, particularly in high-temperature and humid environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lactobacillus plantarum; biological preservative; litchi

Year:  2016        PMID: 30263456      PMCID: PMC6049244          DOI: 10.1007/s10068-016-0252-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol        ISSN: 1226-7708            Impact factor:   2.391


  6 in total

1.  Clinicopathological features of skip metastasis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Manabu Shiozawa; Makoto Akaike; Roppei Yamada; Teni Godai; Naoto Yamamoto; Hiroshige Saito; Yukio Sugimasa; Shoji Takemiya; Yasushi Rino; Toshio Imada
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

2.  Anti-bacterial activity of Lactobacillus plantarum strain SK1 against Listeria monocytogenes is due to lactic acid production.

Authors:  A R Wilson; D Sigee; H A S Epton
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Effect of glucose in removal of microcystin-LR by viable commercial probiotic strains and strains isolated from dadih fermented milk.

Authors:  Sonja M K Nybom; M Carmen Collado; Ingrid S Surono; Seppo J Salminen; Jussi A O Meriluoto
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 4.  Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Yezaz A Ghouri; David M Richards; Erik F Rahimi; Joseph T Krill; Katherine A Jelinek; Andrew W DuPont
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-09

5.  Intestinal microbiota, probiotics and mental health: from Metchnikoff to modern advances: Part II - contemporary contextual research.

Authors:  Alison C Bested; Alan C Logan; Eva M Selhub
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.181

6.  Early mucosal sensing of SIV infection by paneth cells induces IL-1β production and initiates gut epithelial disruption.

Authors:  Lauren A Hirao; Irina Grishina; Olivier Bourry; William K Hu; Monsicha Somrit; Sumathi Sankaran-Walters; Chris A Gaulke; Anne N Fenton; Jay A Li; Robert W Crawford; Frank Chuang; Ross Tarara; Maria L Marco; Andreas J Bäumler; Holland Cheng; Satya Dandekar
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.823

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.