S Kim1, M Kang2, D W Kim1, J-H Choi3. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (S.K., M.K., D.W.K.). 2. From the Departments of Radiology (S.K., M.K., D.W.K.) myongjinkang1@gmail.com. 3. Neurosurgery (J.-H.C.), Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Follow-up with MRA for intracranial aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling is complicated by imaging artifacts. We evaluated the usefulness of an alternative method: vessel wall MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of medical records of 47 patients who underwent 3D TOF-MRA, vessel wall MRI, and DSA after stent-assisted coiling between March 2016 and January 2018. We evaluated the mean value of the signal intensity in the stented artery and the contralateral normal artery on vessel wall MRI. The quality of visualization was further compared between TOF-MRA and vessel wall MRI. Furthermore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and concordance rate of TOF-MRA and vessel wall MRI for assessing the patency of the stented parent artery. DSA was used as a reference test. RESULTS: The mean signal intensities of the stented and normal arteries on vessel wall MRI were not significantly different (P = .133). The mean scores for the visualization of the stented parent artery on vessel wall MRI were significantly superior to those of TOF-MRA images (P < .001). Vessel wall MRI reached an excellent positive predictive value (100%). However, TOF-MRA had a poor positive predictive value (11%; 95% CI, 9%-12%). The likelihood ratios of vessel wall MRI and TOF-MRA were 27.36 (P < .001) and 2.98 (P = .225), respectively. The concordance rate of vessel wall MRI and TOF-MRA with DSA for evaluating the state of the stented artery was 100% (κ = 1) and 28% (κ = 0.038), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vessel wall MRI may be useful in evaluating the patency of stented arteries after stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Follow-up with MRA for intracranial aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling is complicated by imaging artifacts. We evaluated the usefulness of an alternative method: vessel wall MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of medical records of 47 patients who underwent 3D TOF-MRA, vessel wall MRI, and DSA after stent-assisted coiling between March 2016 and January 2018. We evaluated the mean value of the signal intensity in the stented artery and the contralateral normal artery on vessel wall MRI. The quality of visualization was further compared between TOF-MRA and vessel wall MRI. Furthermore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and concordance rate of TOF-MRA and vessel wall MRI for assessing the patency of the stented parent artery. DSA was used as a reference test. RESULTS: The mean signal intensities of the stented and normal arteries on vessel wall MRI were not significantly different (P = .133). The mean scores for the visualization of the stented parent artery on vessel wall MRI were significantly superior to those of TOF-MRA images (P < .001). Vessel wall MRI reached an excellent positive predictive value (100%). However, TOF-MRA had a poor positive predictive value (11%; 95% CI, 9%-12%). The likelihood ratios of vessel wall MRI and TOF-MRA were 27.36 (P < .001) and 2.98 (P = .225), respectively. The concordance rate of vessel wall MRI and TOF-MRA with DSA for evaluating the state of the stented artery was 100% (κ = 1) and 28% (κ = 0.038), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vessel wall MRI may be useful in evaluating the patency of stented arteries after stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms.