| Literature DB >> 30262181 |
Christina Schonberg1, Gary F Marcus2, Scott P Johnson3.
Abstract
We asked whether 11- and 14- month-old infants' abstract rule learning, an early form of analogical reasoning, is susceptible to processing constraints imposed by limits in attention and memory for sequence position. We examined 11- and 14- month-old infants' learning and generalization of abstract repetition rules ("repetition anywhere," Experiment 1 or "medial repetition," Experiment 2) and ordering of specific items (edge positions, Experiment 3) in 4-item sequences. Infants were habituated to sequences containing repetition- and/or position-based structure and then tested with "familiar" vs. "novel" (random) sequences composed of new items. Eleven-month-olds (N = 40) failed to learn abstract repetition rules, but 14-month-olds (N = 40) learned rules under both conditions. In Experiment 3, 11-month-olds (N = 20) learned item edge positions in sequences identical to those in Experiment 2. We conclude that infant sequence learning is constrained by item position in similar ways as in adults.Entities:
Keywords: Abstract rule learning; Analogical reasoning; Infant learning; Perceptual primitives; Sequence learning
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30262181 PMCID: PMC6246817 DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infant Behav Dev ISSN: 0163-6383