Literature DB >> 30261237

Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ULTIMATE Trial.

Junjie Zhang1, Xiaofei Gao2, Jing Kan2, Zhen Ge2, Leng Han3, Shu Lu4, Nailiang Tian2, Song Lin2, Qinghua Lu5, Xueming Wu6, Qihua Li7, Zhizhong Liu2, Yan Chen8, Xuesong Qian9, Juan Wang3, Dayang Chai4, Chonghao Chen6, Xiaolong Li7, Bill D Gogas10, Tao Pan2, Shoujie Shan2, Fei Ye2, Shao-Liang Chen11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events compared with angiography guidance for patients with individual lesion subset. However, the beneficial effect on major adverse cardiovascular event outcome of IVUS guidance over angiography guidance in all-comers who undergo DES implantation still remains understudied.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the benefits of IVUS guidance over angiography guidance during DES implantation in all-comer patients.
METHODS: A total of 1,448 all-comer patients who required DES implantation were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either an IVUS guidance or angiography guidance group. The primary endpoint was target-vessel failure (TVF) at 12 months, including cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR). The procedure was defined as a success if all IVUS-defined optimal criteria were met.
RESULTS: At 12 months follow-up, 60 TVFs (4.2%) occurred, with 21 (2.9%) in the IVUS group and 39 (5.4%) in the angiography group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.530; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.312 to 0.901; p = 0.019). In the IVUS group, TVF was recorded in 1.6% of patients with successful procedures, compared with 4.4% in patients who failed to achieve all optimal criteria (HR: 0.349; 95% CI: 0.135 to 0.898; p = 0.029). The significant reduction of clinically driven target-lesion revascularization or definite stent thrombosis (HR: 0.407; 95% CI: 0.188 to 0.880; p = 0.018) based on lesion-level analysis by IVUS guidance was not achieved when the patient-level analysis was performed.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that IVUS-guided DES implantation significantly improved clinical outcome in all-comers, particularly for patients who had an IVUS-defined optimal procedure, compared with angiography guidance. (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in "All-Comers" Coronary Lesions [ULTIMATE]; NCT02215915).
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  all-comers; drug-eluting stent; intravascular ultrasound; optimal criteria

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30261237     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  46 in total

Review 1.  Physiological Assessment of Coronary Lesions in 2020.

Authors:  Mohsin Chowdhury; Eric A Osborn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 2.  Current Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Intervention.

Authors:  Harsha S Nagarajarao; Chandra P Ojha; Venkatachalam Mulukutla; Ahmed Ibrahim; Adriana C Mares; Timir K Paul
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Considering optimal strategy in rotational atherectomy: Optimal strategy in rotational atherectomy.

Authors:  Ko Yamamoto; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2020-07-20

4.  Early Australian experience with intravascular lithotripsy treatment of severe calcific coronary stenosis: IVL in acute/chronic coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Ata Doost; James Marangou; Thato Mabote; Gerald Yong; Sharad Shetty; Alan Whelan; Matthew Erickson; Michael Nguyen; Christopher Judkins; Anthony Putrino; Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid; Richard Clugston; James Rankin
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 5.  Three Technologies That Will Guide Revascularization of Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients into the 21st Century: A Review.

Authors:  Michael A Winkler; Ripa Patel; Weibo Fu; Vishal Arora; Neal L Weintraub
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-08-25

6.  Cascaded learning in intravascular ultrasound: coronary stent delineation in manual pullbacks.

Authors:  Tobias Wissel; Katharina A Riedl; Klaus Schaefers; Hannes Nickisch; Fabian J Brunner; Nikolas D Schnellbaecher; Stefan Blankenberg; Moritz Seiffert; Michael Grass
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Stenting With and Without Use of Intravascular Ultrasound.

Authors:  Amgad Mentias; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; Marwan Saad; Sidakpal Panaich; Samir Kapadia; Phillip A Horwitz; Saket Girotra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  Prognostic significance of the Medina classification in bifurcation lesion percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Leor Perl; Guy Witberg; Gabriel Greenberg; Hana Vaknin-Assa; Ran Kornowski; Abid Assali
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Plaque erosion and acute coronary syndromes: phenotype, molecular characteristics and future directions.

Authors:  Akl C Fahed; Ik-Kyung Jang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 10.  Safety and Efficacy of Minimum- or Zero-Contrast IVUS-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandru Burlacu; Grigore Tinica; Crischentian Brinza; Radu Crisan-Dabija; Iolanda Valentina Popa; Adrian Covic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.