Literature DB >> 30261099

A Worldwide Study of Bullets Fired From 10 Consecutively Rifled 9MM RUGER Pistol Barrels-Analysis of Examiner Error Rate.

James E Hamby1, David J Brundage2, Nicholas D K Petraco3,4, James W Thorpe5.   

Abstract

This technical note is an update on a continuing study, first designed and initiated by Brundage et al. over twenty years ago , which seeks to test the community of forensic firearms examiners' ability to associate fired bullets with the barrels through which they passed. To date, 697 participants have utilized over 240 test sets consisting of bullets fired through 10 consecutively rifled RUGER P-85 pistol barrels. Here, we report on the results of the ongoing "10-barrel test" up until the point in time of writing this manuscript. To analyze the totality of data thus far collected, a Bayesian approach was selected. Posterior average examiner error rates are assigned assuming only vague prior information. Given the data found over the course of this diverse decades-long study, our most conservative value for average examiner error rate has a posterior mean of 0.053% with a 95% probability interval of [1.1 × 10-5 %, 0.16%].
© 2018 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990IBISzzm321990; Bayesian statistics; Daubert; SciClops®; ballistics imaging instrumentation; consecutively rifled barrels; criteria for identification; error rates; firearms identification; fired bullets; forensic science; scientific research; subclass characteristics

Year:  2018        PMID: 30261099     DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  3 in total

Review 1.  Interpol review of shoe and tool marks 2016-2019.

Authors:  Martin Baiker-Sørensen; Koen Herlaar; Isaac Keereweer; Petra Pauw-Vugts; Richard Visser
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners.

Authors:  Keith L Monson; Erich D Smith; Stanley J Bajic
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2022-02-19

3.  Inconclusives, errors, and error rates in forensic firearms analysis:Three statistical perspectives.

Authors:  Alan H Dorfman; Richard Valliant
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2022-06-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.