Literature DB >> 30260274

Incidence of allergic reactions to Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab.

Moteb Khobrani1,2, Yvonne Huckleberry3, Keith J Boesen4, Ahmed Aljabri5, Mobarak Alharthi6, Asad E Patanwala1,6.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The administration of Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (FabAV) currently requires close observation, so patients can be monitored for hypersensitivity reactions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions to FabAV.
METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from a statewide poison center database in the United States. Records of all patients envenomated by a rattlesnake and treated with FabAV between January 2002 and December 2014 were evaluated. Patients with acute hypersensitivity reactions were identified, and reactions were evaluated descriptively.
RESULTS: A total of 1340 adult and pediatric patients received FabAV during the study period. Of these, 19 (1.4%) patients had a potential reaction to FabAV, with 10 requiring a reduction in infusion rate, but none requiring discontinuation of the antivenom. Reactions occurred during the loading dose (n = 10), maintenance doses (n = 4), or were delayed reactions (n = 6). Symptoms recorded included pruritus (n = 8), hives (n = 8), rash (n = 7), vomiting (n = 7), nausea (n = 6), dyspnea or wheezing (n = 4), diaphoresis (n = 3), throat irritation (n = 2), and mild hypotension (n = 2). One patient was given a concomitant administration of low dose epinephrine infusion until completion of the antivenom course. However, none of the reactions were considered to be life-threatening.
CONCLUSION: FabAV appears to be associated with a low incidence of acute hypersensitivity reactions. Patients may not require placement in a location capable of detecting and rapidly responding to hemodynamic and/or airway issues for FabAV monitoring alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (MeSH): antivenins; critical care; drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; hypersensitivity; intensive care units; snake bites

Year:  2018        PMID: 30260274     DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1504956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-3650            Impact factor:   4.467


  3 in total

1.  Recovery from Copperhead Snake Envenomation: Role of Age, Sex, Bite Location, Severity, and Treatment.

Authors:  Eric J Lavonas; Randy I Burnham; John Schwarz; Eugenia Quackenbush; Brandon Lewis; S Rutherfoord Rose; Spencer Greene; Eric A Toschlog; Nathan P Charlton; Michael E Mullins; Richard Schwartz; David Denning; Kapil Sharma; Kurt Kleinschmidt; Sean P Bush; Victoria E Anderson; Adit A Ginde; Charles J Gerardo
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2019-09-03

2.  α-Gal on Crotalidae-polyvalent Fab antivenom (CroFab): Investigating the relevance to immediate hypersensitivity reactions.

Authors:  Matthew Straesser; Behnam Keshavarz; Larry Borish; Dilawar Khokhar; Angela Holian; Nathan P Charlton; Thomas A E Platts-Mills; Jeffrey M Wilson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-10-27

3.  A phase IV, prospective, observational study of the clinical safety of snake antivenoms.

Authors:  Denise Christie Souto Nogueira; Iara Pinheiro Calil; Roberta Márcia Marques Dos Santos; Adebal de Andrade Filho; Gláucia Cota
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 1.846

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.