Literature DB >> 30259721

Awake craniotomy in glioma surgery: is it necessary?

Chase H Foster1, Peter J Morone2, Aaron Cohen-Gadol3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The awake craniotomy has evolved from its humble beginnings in ancient cultures to become one of the most eloquent modern neurosurgical procedures. The development of intraoperative mapping techniques like direct electrostimulation of the cortex and subcortical white matter have further argued for its place in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium. Yet the suitability of the awake craniotomy with intraoperative functional mapping (ACWM) to optimize oncofunctional balance after peri-eloquent glioma resection continues to be a topic of active investigation as new methods of intraoperative monitoring and some unfavorable outcome data question its necessity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The neurosurgery and anesthesiology literatures were scoured for English-language studies that analyzed or reviewed the ACWM or its components as applied to glioma surgery via the PubMed, ClinicalKey, and OvidMEDLINE® databases or via direct online searches of journal archives. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Information on background, conceptualization, standard techniques, and outcomes of the ACWM were provided and compared. We parceled the procedure into its components and qualitatively described positive and negative outcome data for each. Findings were presented in the context of each study without attempt at quantitative analysis or reconciliation of heterogeneity between studies. Certain illustrative studies were highlighted throughout the review. Overarching conclusions were drawn based on level of evidence, expert opinion, and predominate concordance of data across studies in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: Most investigators and studies agree that the ACWM is the best currently available approach to optimize oncofunctional balance in this difficult-to-treat patient population. This qualitative review synthesizes the most currently available data on the topic to provide contemporaneous insight into how and why the ACWM has become a favorite operation of neurosurgeons worldwide for the resection of gliomas from eloquent brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30259721     DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04590-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci        ISSN: 0390-5616            Impact factor:   2.279


  4 in total

1.  Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum.

Authors:  Meng Cui; Hewen Chen; Guochen Sun; Jialin Liu; Meng Zhang; Hepu Lin; Caihong Sun; Xiaodong Ma
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Group-level stability but individual variability of neurocognitive status after awake resections of right frontal IDH-mutated glioma.

Authors:  Marion Barberis; Isabelle Poisson; Valentine Facque; Sophie Letrange; Cécile Prevost-Tarabon; Emmanuel Houdart; Sébastien Froelich; Richard Levy; Emmanuel Mandonnet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Efficacy of Remifentanil Combined with Propofol in Craniotomy for Tumor Was Evaluated by Wake Quality, Hemodynamics, and Adverse Reactions.

Authors:  Qiang Zhou; Yanan Han; Jun Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Reconfiguration from emergency to urgent elective neurosurgery for glioblastoma patients improves length of stay, surgical adjunct use, and extent of resective surgery.

Authors:  Rosa Sun; Shivam Sharma; Helen Benghiat; Sara Meade; Paul Sanghera; Gregory Bramwell; Santhosh Nagaraju; Ute Pohl; Camilla Dawson; Vladimir Petrik; Ismail Ughratdar; Anwen White; Athanasios Zisakis; Satheesh Ramalingam; Vijay Sawlani; Colin Watts; Victoria Wykes
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2022-05-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.