Raffaele La Russa1,2, Carlo Catalano3, Mariantonia Di Sanzo1, Matteo Scopetti1, Vittorio Gatto1, Alessandro Santurro1, Rocco Valerio Viola1, Valeria Panebianco3, Paola Frati1,2, Vittorio Fineschi4,5. 1. Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161, Rome, Italy. 2. IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense 18, Pozzilli, 86077, Italy. 3. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161, Rome, Italy. vfinesc@tin.it. 5. IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense 18, Pozzilli, 86077, Italy. vfinesc@tin.it.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Several studies have been performed to assess the efficacy of postmortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) in solving cases of sudden cardiac death, even in comparison with the traditional autopsy. However, the results were often inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, a global discussion on the subject through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis is necessary. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed was performed up to April 23, 2018. Studies exploring the role of PMCTA in cases of sudden cardiac death and the accuracy of this method in diagnosing the cause of death compared to traditional autopsy were included. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of the seven included studies, using conventional autopsy as a reference standard, were 92% and 95%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were, respectively, 20.76 (95% CI 1.16-370.2) and 0.08 (95% CI 0.03-0.17), showing that PMCTA represents a strong indicator of the posttest probability of disease. The diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve were, respectively, 261.54 (95% CI 1.87-5760.53) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95), indicating a high diagnostic power of the test. CONCLUSION: PMCTA demonstrated a high accuracy in the diagnosis of parietal and luminal coronary changes but was less effective in detecting myocardial ischemia and necrosis. Therefore, the only radiological investigation is often insufficient to determine the cause of sudden death and the conventional autopsy remains the gold standard. However, PMCTA can improve the performance of the autopsy, serving as an aid and guide in the sampling phase for histopathological investigations.
INTRODUCTION: Several studies have been performed to assess the efficacy of postmortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) in solving cases of sudden cardiac death, even in comparison with the traditional autopsy. However, the results were often inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, a global discussion on the subject through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis is necessary. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed was performed up to April 23, 2018. Studies exploring the role of PMCTA in cases of sudden cardiac death and the accuracy of this method in diagnosing the cause of death compared to traditional autopsy were included. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of the seven included studies, using conventional autopsy as a reference standard, were 92% and 95%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were, respectively, 20.76 (95% CI 1.16-370.2) and 0.08 (95% CI 0.03-0.17), showing that PMCTA represents a strong indicator of the posttest probability of disease. The diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve were, respectively, 261.54 (95% CI 1.87-5760.53) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95), indicating a high diagnostic power of the test. CONCLUSION: PMCTA demonstrated a high accuracy in the diagnosis of parietal and luminal coronary changes but was less effective in detecting myocardial ischemia and necrosis. Therefore, the only radiological investigation is often insufficient to determine the cause of sudden death and the conventional autopsy remains the gold standard. However, PMCTA can improve the performance of the autopsy, serving as an aid and guide in the sampling phase for histopathological investigations.
Authors: Claudia Giaconi; Alice Chiara Manetti; Emanuele Neri; Marco Di Paolo; Sara Turco; Marzia Coppola; David Forni; Damiano Marra; Raffaele La Russa; Michele Karaboue; Aniello Maiese; Luigi Papi; Emanuela Turillazzi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Paola Tomao; Raffaele La Russa; Alessandra Oliva; Massimiliano De Angelis; Antonella Mansi; Emilia Paba; Anna Maria Marcelloni; Alessandra Chiominto; Martina Padovano; Aniello Maiese; Matteo Scopetti; Paola Frati; Vittorio Fineschi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Max G Mentink; Bartholomeus G H Latten; Frans C H Bakers; Casper Mihl; Roger J M W Rennenberg; Bela Kubat; Paul A M Hofman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Giuseppe Bertozzi; Francesco Pio Cafarelli; Michela Ferrara; Nicola Di Fazio; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luigi Cipolloni; Federico Manetti; Raffaele La Russa; Vittorio Fineschi Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-01-17