Literature DB >> 30259162

"Underwater" endoscopic submucosal dissection: a novel method for resection in saline with a bipolar needle knife for colorectal epithelial neoplasia.

Shunsuke Yoshii1, Tomofumi Akasaka2, Yoshito Hayashi1, Yoshiki Tsujii1, Kengo Nagai1, Koji Higashino2, Ryu Ishihara2, Hideki Iijima1, Tetsuo Takehara3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in therapeutic strategy and instrumentation in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), adverse events sometimes occur. Further advancements in available techniques are required to improve procedural success rates and safety. We developed a novel method for ESD in saline, referred to as "underwater" ESD (UESD). UESD involves using a bipolar needle knife and aims to enable complete resection while minimizing thermal damage to the muscle layer. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of this new technique.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study using data from two referral centers and included 40 lesions diagnosed as colorectal epithelial neoplasia (> 20 mm in diameter or with severe fibrosis) and treated with UESD between December 2015 and March 2017. The main outcome measures were technical success rate, incidence of adverse events, and feasibility of histologic evaluation of the resected specimens.
RESULTS: All 40 lesions, including those with submucosal fibrosis, underwent successful en bloc resection using the UESD technique. No procedural adverse events including perforation, delayed bleeding, and electrocoagulation syndrome were observed, and all patients had an uneventful clinical course associated with UESD. In all cases, UESD provided a resected specimen adequate for histological evaluation, without unwarranted burn effect to the tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: Our UESD technique was safe and effective for complete resection of colorectal epithelial neoplasia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Underwater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30259162     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6278-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Underwater peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Authors:  Kenneth F Binmoeller; Yasser M Bhat
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Risk of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon and rectum.

Authors:  Dahyun Jung; Young Hoon Youn; Jaehoon Jahng; Jie-Hyun Kim; Hyojin Park
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort.

Authors:  Yoji Takeuchi; Hiroyasu Iishi; Shinji Tanaka; Yutaka Saito; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yasushi Sano; Takashi Hisabe; Naohisa Yahagi; Yusuke Saitoh; Masahiro Igarashi; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Hiroo Yamano; Seiji Shimizu; Osamu Tsuruta; Yuji Inoue; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hisashi Nakamura; Takahiro Fujii; Noriya Uedo; Toshio Shimokawa; Hideki Ishikawa; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  "Underwater" EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video).

Authors:  Kenneth F Binmoeller; Frank Weilert; Janak Shah; Yasser Bhat; Steve Kane
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  A Review Comparing Experience and Results with Bipolar Versus Monopolar Resection for Treatment of Bladder Tumors.

Authors:  Yasser Osman; Ahmed M Harraz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; Arnaldo Amato; Christian Ell; Shai Friedland; Judith O Harker; Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Joseph W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Silvia Paggi; Jürgen Pohl; Franco Radaelli; Francisco C Ramirez; Rodelei Siao-Salera; Vittorio Terruzzi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Mikihiro Fujiya; Kazuyuki Tanaka; Tatsuya Dokoshi; Motoya Tominaga; Nobuhiro Ueno; Yuhei Inaba; Takahiro Ito; Kentaro Moriichi; Yutaka Kohgo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Water-immersion sigmoidoscopy to treat acute GI bleeding in the perioperative period after surgical colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Frossard; Pascal Gervaz; Olivier Huber
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Treatment of bladder tumors and benign prostatic hyperplasia with a new TUR system using physiological saline as perfusate.

Authors:  Rikio Yoshimura; Takahisa Adachi; Kiyoaki Funao; Hitoshi Kobayakawa; Masahide Matsuyama; Kennji Tsuchida; Yoshiaki Takemoto; Tatsuya Nakatani
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video).

Authors:  Yutaka Saito; Toshio Uraoka; Takahisa Matsuda; Fabian Emura; Hisatomo Ikehara; Yumi Mashimo; Tsuyoshi Kikuchi; Kuang-I Fu; Yasushi Sano; Daizo Saito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  2 in total

1.  Combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, a practical solution for difficult cases.

Authors:  Dong-Hoon Yang
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-09-15

2.  Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection and hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection as rescue therapy in difficult colorectal cases.

Authors:  Paolo Cecinato; Matteo Lucarini; Chiara Campanale; Francesco Azzolini; Fabio Bassi; Romano Sassatelli
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-09-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.