| Literature DB >> 30258978 |
Luis Dos Santos1, Ednei L Antonio1, Andrey J Serra2, Amanda Yoshizaki1, Larissa Seibt1, Flavio A Silva1, Gisele K Couto3, Luciana V Rossoni3, Paulo Tucci1, Angelo A de Paola1, Guilherme Fenelon1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexists with congestive heart failure (CHF). The increased susceptibility to AF in CHF has been attributed to a variety of structural and electrophysiological changes in the atria, particularly dilation and interstitial fibrosis. We evaluated atrial remodeling and AF vulnerability in a rat model of CHF induced by left ventricle (LV) radiofrequency (RF) ablation.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Atrial fibrosis; Heart failure; Radiofrequency ablation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258978 PMCID: PMC6153117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.09.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ISSN: 2352-9067
Echocardiographic variables for ablation, ablation + spironolactone and sham groups 12 weeks after the ablation procedure.
| Variable | SHAM (n = 29) | Ab (n = 36) | AbSpi (n = 20) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 422.5 ± 50.89 | 435.4 ± 49.55 | 430.1 ± 34.46 |
| LA(cm) - M mode | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 0.69 ± 0.09** | 0.75 ± 0.06***¥ |
| ML (cm) 4-chamber view | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.09* | 0.61 ± 0.08** |
| IS (cm) 4-chamber view | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 0.69 ± 0.08*** | 0.73 ± 0.06*** |
| LA area (cm2) 4-chamber view | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.08*** | 0.38 ± 0.07*** |
| LA area (cm2) Bi-mode | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.13*** | 0.59 ± 0.19*** |
| LA/Ao ratio Bi-mode | 1.29 ± 0.18 | 1.62 ± 0.26*** | 1.7 ± 0.22*** |
| LVDD (cm) | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.93 ± 0.10*** | 0.95 ± 0.06*** |
| LVSD (cm) | 0.37 ± 0.17 | 0.68 ± 0.09*** | 0.72 ± 0.06*** |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 83 ± 8.9 | 57 ± 11*** | 52 ± 7.2*** |
Data described as mean ± standard deviation. Sham: sham group; Ab: ablation group; AbSpi: ablation treated with spironolactone group; LA: left atrium; ML: medial-lateral left atrium measured in the 4-chamber view; IS: inferior-superior left atrium measured in the 4-chamber view; LA/Ao: left atrium/aorta ratio measured by the short axis; LVDD: left ventricle diameter in diastole; LVDS: left ventricle diameter in systole; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 versus SHAM; ¥p = 0.02 versus Ab.
Fig. 1(A) Atrial fibrillation (AF) induction (3.5 s duration) by a 30-millisecond burst pacing applied for 0.3 s. (B) AF inducibility rates for ablation (Ab), ablation + spironolactone (AbSpi) and sham groups. AF tended to be more easily induced in the AbSpi group than in sham animals (p = 0.07). (C) Long lasting (>15 min) atrial fibrillation (LLAF) inducibility rates for ablation (Ab), ablation + spironolactone (AbSpi) and sham groups. (D) AF duration. Data described as median and interquartile range. AF duration tended to be increased in the Ab group compared with sham and AbSpi groups (p = 0.07). NIAF: noninducible AF; NSAF: nonsustained AF; SAF: sustained AF; **p = 0.005 versus sham; NS: nonsignificant.
Fig. 2Picrosirius stains of the left atrium from 1 animal in each group (top) and comparison of the percentage of collagen density in the left atrium (bottom). Interstitial fibrosis was increased in the ablation (Ab) group as compared to sham animals (*p < 0.001) and ablation + spironolactone (AbSpi) group (#p < 0.01). The amount of fibrosis did not differ between AbSpi and sham rats. Numbers inside bars indicate sample sizes.
Fig. 3Left atrial myocytes expression of: transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ-1); collagen I/III; connexin 43; CaV1.2 and Ponceau staining as loading control for ablation (Ab), ablation + spironolactone (AbSpi) and sham groups. *p < 0.01 vs. sham; #p < 0.01 vs. sham and AbSpi groups. Numbers inside bars indicate sample sizes.