| Literature DB >> 30258950 |
Majid Radfard1, Hamed Soleimani2, Samira Nabavi2, Bayram Hashemzadeh3, Hesam Akbari4, Hamed Akbari4, Amir Adibzadeh4,2,3.
Abstract
In this article the data of the groundwater quality of Aras catchment area were investigated for estimating the sodium absorption ratio (SAR) in the years 2010-2014. The artificial neural network (ANN) is defined as a system of processor elements, called neurons, which create a network by a set of weights. In the present data article, a 3-layer MLP neural network including a hidden layer, an input layer and an output layer had been designed. The number of neurons in the input and output layers of network was considered to be 4 and 1, respectively, due to having four input variables (including: pH, sulfate, chloride and electrical conductivity (EC)) and only one output variable (sodium absorption ratio). The impact of pH, sulfate, chloride and EC were estimated to be 11.34%, 72.22%, 94% and 91%, respectively. ANN and multiple linear regression methods were used to estimate the rate of sodium absorption ratio of groundwater resources of the Aras catchment area. The data of both methods were compared with the model׳s performance evaluation criteria, namely root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (%) and correlation coefficient. The data showed that ANN is a helpful and exact tool for predicting the amount SAR in groundwater resources of Aras catchment area and these results are not comparable with the results of multiple linear regressions.Entities:
Keywords: Aras; Groundwater quality; Multiple linear regression; Neural network; SAR
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258950 PMCID: PMC6153356 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Comparison of the performance of seven Back-propagation algorithms in estimating the sodium absorption ratio with the number of neurons 10 in the hidden layer.
| Back-propagation algorithms | Neural network process | Evaluation of model performance | Repeat number | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | MSE | ||||
| Trainbfg (BFGS quasi-Newton) | Training | 0.883 | 1.34 | 5 | 132 |
| Test | 0.819 | 1.33 | 4.54 | 132 | |
| Training+Test+Validation | 0.866 | 1.36 | 4.7 | 132 | |
| Traincgp (Polak–Ribie´re conjugate gradient) | Training | 0.916 | 1.15 | 3.07 | 39 |
| Test | 0.855 | 1.2 | 3.16 | 39 | |
| Training+Test+Validation | 0.893 | 1.2 | 3.78 | 39 | |
| Traingd (gradient descent) | Training | 0.726 | 13.09 | 197.07 | 52 |
| Test | 0.736 | 13.89 | 221.88 | 52 | |
| Training+Test+Validation | 0.762 | 13.17 | 193.17 | 52 | |
| Traingda (adaptive learning rate back-propagation) | Training | 0.806 | 1.71 | 7.25 | 500 |
| Test | 0.85 | 1.54 | 4.58 | 500 | |
| Training+Test+Validation | 0.811 | 1.68 | 6.55 | 500 | |
| Trainscg (scaled conjugate gradient) | Training | 0.898 | 1.23 | 4.13 | 143 |
| Test | 0.86 | 1.16 | 2.55 | 143 | |
| Training+Test+Validation | 0.89 | 1.25 | 3.85 | 143 | |
| Traincgf (Fletcher–Powell conjugate gradient) | Training | 0.868 | 1.4 | 4.9 | 34 |
| Test | 0.0804 | 1.52 | 4.49 | 34 | |
| Training+Test+Validation | 0.85 | 1.43 | 5.16 | 34 | |
| Trainlm (Levenberg-Marquardt) | Training | 0.906 | 1.05 | 2.77 | 29 |
| Test | 0.9 | 0.92 | 1.9 | 29 | |
| Training+Test+Validation | 0.0901 | 1.08 | 3.52 | 29 | |
Comparison of the different neurons performance in the hidden layer in estimating the sodium absorption ratio using the Lewenberg-Markow algorithm.
| 3 | 0.879 | 1.23 | 4.59 | 25 |
| 5 | 0.86 | 1.24 | 4.81 | 32 |
| 7 | 0.91 | 1.22 | 3.61 | 25 |
| 10 | 0.9 | 0.923 | 1.9 | 29 |
| 12 | 0.89 | 1.14 | 4.03 | 33 |
| 17 | 0.88 | 1.09 | 2.37 | 29 |
| 20 | 0.895 | 1.08 | 3.76 | 30 |
| 30 | 0.892 | 1.09 | 3.92 | 34 |
Fig. 1Optimized neural network output and model performance criteria for all data.
Fig. 2Optimized neural network output and model performance criteria for test data.
Fig. 3Actual SAR values in groundwater resources and their predicted values with multiple linear regression.
Fig. 4Study area.
| Subject area | Chemistry |
| More specific subject area | Water quality and monitoring |
| Type of data | Tables, Figures |
| How data was acquired | Data on groundwater resources quality in the Aras catchment area was obtained from West Azerbaijan Water and Wastewater Company during the years 2010–2014 and was studied for estimation of sodium absorption ratio (SAR). |
| Data format | Raw, Analyzed |
| Experimental factors | The sodium absorption ratio (SAR), were analyzed according to the standards for water and wastewater treatment handbook. |
| Experimental features | The levels of physical and chemical parameters were determined. |
| Data source location | Aras, West Azerbaijan province, Iran. |
| Data accessibility | Data are included in this article |
| Related research article | A.Takdastana, M. Mirzabeygi (Radfard), M.Yousefi, A. Abbasnia, R. Khodadadia, A H.Mahvi, D.Jalili Naghan, Neuro-fuzzy inference system Prediction of stability indices and Sodium absorption ratio in Lordegan rural drinking water resources in west Iran, Data in Breif 18(2018)255–261. |